>no info on tokenomics
>no info on the progress of the contracts (the most important part)
>no solid info on users ready to use the network
>no answer to how many people are working full time on the project
>no ETA on when the main net will go live, let alone the core adapters for chains other than ethereum
>ripped to shreds by a code reviewer with no answers from anyone but the community manager (not even the technical communtity manager) and some random guy (jonny) who has a financial interest in the network being successful and now seeing that the whole thing is in question is having a crowdsale to get some eth and bounce.
No info on tokenomics
Charles Fisher
Other urls found in this thread:
arxiv.org
technologyreview.com
twitter.com
Chase Wood
Damn biz bro. I’m a holding heavy bags and now this shit. Fuck man. LINK is making me insane
Angel Nelson
Link is the Veeky Forums meme coin that gets shilled to newfags. If you bought heavy bags then you deserve to lose money on that garbage.
Luke Anderson
You faggots need to step away if your panties are getting all bunched up.
Take a year off and come back a rich man.
Don't be faggots.
William Nguyen
checkd so i can relax
Tyler Rogers
My bags was accumulated around $0.16...
Get rekt faggit
Justin Fisher
almost 100% of chainlink threads are just copy/paste now
what's the point?
Owen Perry
>TRON: limited applications, hasn’t even entered testnet yet. Nobody cares. $2.6 billion market cap
>LINK: more applications than anything except ethereum itself. In testnet, about to enter ropston. Criticized for not making progress fast enough,150 million market cap
This is how you know Link is cheap.
Logan Flores
Trips of fucking truth, my dude. Some are memeing, but I am disappointed in Veeky Forums for being part of the FUD that's going on. If you are legitimately panicking today, you need to log off and come back in a few months
Blake Williams
>and some random guy (jonny)
That random guy is developing in parallel to whatever code Chainlink team releases. It's safe to say he's more knowledgeable about the code than some reviewer that is looking at it for the first time.
You seem to know a lot about the project, so you know that Sergey and the team don't interact with the community in that way. You know you won't see the actual developers defend their work on reddit.
>ripped to shreds
lol, you haven't seen the other reviews have you?
Tyler Long
There's no info because Sergey et al realise the error of testing it out on ethereum's testnet, Ropsten. The only bullet LINK has at this stage is the blockchain agnosticism, as ETH smart contracts are exploitable. This is a big risk too considering we won't understand the actual limitations of the software until its up and running. No institution would dare risk facilitating financial transactions on a process that functions with a ~3.5% error rate. No lie. Here's the paper. arxiv.org
It was carried out by a multi-university analysis involving University College of London and UoS. Skip to the conclusion if you're not interested in technical aspects.
>"We
show three examples of such trace vulnerabilities, leading
to greedy, prodigal and suicidal contracts. Analyzing
970,898 contracts, our new tool MAIAN flags thousands
of contracts vulnerable at a high true positive rate."
Here's a MIT technology review article. Its normie-tier so you can all read it.
technologyreview.com
Jeremiah Ward
2 trips 3 dubs in 10 comments.
Link is the chosen one.
Gabriel Moore
lol at your life
Jason Lewis
>>ripped to shreds by a code reviewer
You do realize they paid him to audit their code, and he failed miserably because he couldn't be bothered to actually read the code?
Dylan Sanders
Why would they pay some random guy who reviews ICOs and not some respected company
Ian Allen
Checked
Isaac Richardson
So ETH is shit when it comes to security.
Nothing to do with LINKs ultimate endeavors
Hudson Jones
Thanks for the post and links btw
Jackson Ortiz
I was hoping to accumulate some more LINK this week, but Veeky Forums is literally the only place that cares about LINK and even you guys have been FUDing the shit out of it lately. What should I do?
Gavin Lewis
Watch Sergey on dev-con and SXSW. Whether if it’s just all hot air or not ... it will get your mind boiling.
Chase Lopez
Stay poor.
>So ETH is shit when it comes to security. Nothing to do with LINKs ultimate endeavors
It absolutely does when LINK will be primarily be using the ethereum blockchain to facilitate trustless smart contracts. Trustless with a ~3.5% failure rate? Not gonna happen. This why I said their only bullet is the agnosticism they plan to implement.
No problem. As you can see by the first person I'm replying to, its only nubiz here and they who don't even have a clue what they're buying.
Sebastian Harris
The magic is back
Jonathan Flores
You are the nubiz. That study is retarded and you know it. By design Solidity attracts the worst mouth breathers you could imagine so 3.5% bad contract rate isn't half bad you nig nog. and that 3.5% includes contracts written by amateurs. Contracts written by professional experienced devs and audited by equally professional firms have a 0% failure rate.