Official philosopher rankings

>enlightened tier
Plato, Proclus, Plotinus, Iamblichus, Augustine, Dionysius, Epictetus, Aurelius, Seneca, Pythagoras, Parmenides, Empedocles, Zeno, Lao Tzu, Zhuangzi, Patanjal, Buddha, Christ, Hermes, Sankara, Nagarjuna, Eckhart, Blake, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, Benjamin, Kuhn, Feyrebrand, Jung, Eliade, Sloterdjik

>devil tier
Heraclitus, Aristotle, Confucius, Nietzsche, Marx, Descartes, Hume, Kant, Darwin, Dawkins, Freud, Aquinas, Machiavelli, Zizek, Badiou, Deleuze, Derrida, Camus, Sartre, Laruelle, Land, Negarestani, Voltaire, Beauvoir, Foucault, Russell, Popper, Chomsky

>Big man with stick tier
Thomas Hobbes, also I'm stealing Nietzche for my breakaway tier.

>Two tiers
Senpai
>Talking shit about Heraclitus
Faaaaaaaaaam
>Talking shit about Machiavelli
Fuck off.

>Good tier
Simone Weil

>shit tier
Everyone else

>Chomsky is a philosopher

When will this meme die

>Spastic neurotic women tier
Simone Weil

>not crazy tier
Everyone else

>devil
>Land
thats like a huge compliment to him my man

Idk seems pretty important to philosophy of mind and philosophy of language if you ask me (or just about anyone else in academia). That being said, while I enjoy his philosophical commentary, I think that most of his work outside of psychology/cognitive science/linguistics is completely misguided (mainly because he attempts to be both a Cartesian and a naturalist at the same time - a rather difficult position to defend).

Why did Schopenhauer hate women?

What have you against Aristotle?

Got cucked by Hegel.

>Heidegger
That opportunist nazi was a total scumbag

God tier:

Simone de Bouvoir

>bigging up someone whose name you can't even spell correctly

>Makes fun of someone for misspelling a name
>Can't even spell a basic word

What's worse?

> OP smoked DMT once and now mistakes mystical bullshit for profound philosophy

>What's worse?
thinking that i made a spelling error in my previous post

>Bigging

ah yes, I was just bigging people up in an alleyway

nice bait, friend.

Penis tier:
my
Dicke Tier -
diary
balls tier
desu

Can anyone explain what these classifications mean? I can't figure it out.

>saying that hegel is enlightened meanwhile categorizing marx as devil tier.
what's the truth, commie? hegel's essays on dialectics reaffirm marxist political theory.

>women
>philosophers
heh

What's wrong with Popper?

>Philosopher
Everyone on OP's list

>Not a philosopher
OP

>Dawkins
>philosopher

What?

>Land
>Considered a philosopher at all

>Aristotle on devil tier but Heidegger on enlightened

This triggers me, because without Aristotle there wouldn't be a Heidegger.

Confucius and Lao-Tzu are inseparable you cunt.

>He likes Nagarjuna and Patanjal but dislikes Heraclitus

I'd be willing to put a large sum of money on the fact that you haven't read at least 3/4 of these

Ugh, well, at least you got Plato and Aristotle right

can you explain Kant's ranking?

Where's Mohammed? I'm assuming he transcends classification, then?

>Hegel, Wittgenstein, Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, Benjamin, Kuhn, Feyrebrand, Jung, Eliade, Sloterdjik

How the hell do these people further the cause of humanity?

And Aquinas and Machiavelli devil tier? Is this from those Catholic conspiracy vids on YouTube or something?

No, they're really not. One is political/moral philosophy. The other is mystical nonsense.

Diogenes is still the only 'right' philosopher

One gives the mysticism,the other the morals.
Together they make a religion.
Ying-Yang Ying-Yang

I can't speak for the others, but Jung's thought has been pretty instrumental in furthering serious speculation and analysis of the symbolic, religious capacity of the human mind in an age where it is still becoming increasingly fashionable to dismiss it.

This.

>good
Everyone, especially the Germans

>bad
The Jews

Proof me wrong

I think the better question is why don't you?

>devil tier
>Heraclitus

you act like a man asleep

More confused about liking Nagarjuna but disliking Hume.

Thanks for the laugh, pal.

too wide but overall i wont argue.

except for herakleitos of course.

+10 for placing blake there. and where is pyrrho?

wtf i almost choked

ALTER

>no Socrates
>Heraclitus not in enlightened tier
I shed an enlightened tear

1. Prove*
2. prove yourself correct
topkek, I responded, and so on

To be "enlightened" is to entertain both the Godly and the mundane.

>both

wrong. it is to realize theyre the same.

Oh shut up