More like shortre amirite

>this is what manlets truly believe

It was his wife's doing mostly. Anyone surprised? Bitch was one of the mothers of second modern feminism.

It was, the average height might have climbed to 5'5" today but back then it was significantly smaller

Are you including billions of China-men in the average? What's the point of that if we're not in China?
>manlet thinking

>simone de beauvoir
>sexy
>simone de beauvoir
>smart

Most intelligent women are either ugly or have this boring 1960's/70's nostalgia style that makes me hurl.
I wish I was a dumb as fuck normalfaggot who wasn't into reading. But sadly enough this is the crowd of people I'm with.

I'm going by the real observable average, not the grossly exaggerated "studies"

>manlet
>brainlet
>lazy eye
>has statutory raped more girls than I will ever even hold hands with
jdimsa

not if youre a guy

if youre a girl and you like guys cuz of their looks then you are dumb and those arent standards.......its just the opposite, a lack of standards

he got cucked left and right

she took him under her armpit cuz of the "WOW! Shes dating that monster?" and the status

she cucked him with Camus, behind his back

Camus was also a manlet though

How are intelligent women into periods known for unabashed hedonism? Are you talking about the natural hippie dippie tie die look? Or the conservative High pants thing. Honestly I'm a fan of simpler looks without flashy colors and an emphasis on shoes and hats so it doesn't bother me either way.

ur funny user. and by funny I mean stupid

Just because you are an ugly gentleman who got a lot of knowledge and the girls doesn't like you back is not because they lack standard. Same with girls. Deal with it

No I'm talking about the girls who dress in big tasteless flower skirts.
The ones who post a lot of pre-colour TV screenshorts on their blogs.

>tfw know nothing about women and their various subcultures

sir you are hideously retarded

holy molly fuck aboly

honestly, I couldn't take serious any philosopher that is 5'0, he inevitably would have insane emotional problems and insecurities that would get in the way of objectivity

enjoy your increased chance of cancer lankets :)

5'6 is average for a frenchman

Don't forget he was ugly and cross eyed. And yet he got laid more than anyone itt and his literary legacy too will outlast them. Really galvanizes one 's cognition.

>NO ONE UNDERSTANDS ME, MOM

Nothing he said was wrong, intelligence is the supreme quality of a man after virtue

"shortre" would be pronounced "shot"

No it isn't

More like Im-a-Manlet Kant.

...

pls be in australia

kwk

at least compared to sartre she was both

>I don't understand why women reject me, I'm so virtuous!

if you're a woman, would you have had sex with nietzsche if you met him

i'm just asking because it seems like it's a thing among leftist women

You're all looking at this backwards. Their heights suggest that, despite tall men being slightly smarter on average, the men of extreme genius are short (much like how women are on average smarter than men, while men dominate the extremes). We shouldn't think less of these philosophers because they're short. Rather, we should abandon our prejudices about short men, realizing they're a superior race. This becomes especially evident when you consider the fact that the world is becoming worse as men are becoming taller. I'm 6'4, but I'm convinced I'd be happier at 5'4. Not only would my size be at odds with the prevailing ideal of masculine beauty, rendering my mere presence a symbol of my rejection of contemporary values, but I'd probably be more intelligent, and I'd almost certainly live a longer, healthier life, like the small men of Okinawa. Let's have the courage to face the fact that largeness is barbaric; smallness is civilized.

?????
So I need to be ugly to be fully smart?

No, but you most likely need to be short. Once we learn to associate smallness with genius and good health, we'll recognize that it's more beautiful. Humans didn't get this far by dint of brute strength. Even the strongest of people are weak compared to some of the other animals. It's our intelligence that has given us the edge over the rest of the animal kingdom.

Aside from Kant, Mozart, Einstein, Goethe, Voltaire, Napoleon, Beethoven, Schubert, Nietzsche, Proust, Faulkner, Aristotle, Newton, and many many others were short. Face it: the 'manlets' are superior. Why does Veeky Forums blindly accept mainstream standards of beauty while rejecting nearly every other popular ideal, recognizing the absurdity of them? Get with it, guys.

Holy fuck, I thought that's edited. How did he manage to grab so many pussy?

if any correlation were to be made, the shortness of extreme geniuses would likely be not a cause, but an effect of their brains sapping nutrients from the rest of the organism at an inhumanely high rate, in turn stunting their bodies' physical growth

in other words, if you really wanted to be a manlet, maybe you should've used that brain for something every once in a while

of course, citation is still pending that there is any inverse correlation between manletcy and brainletcy, seeing as I'm tall, and yet I'm pretty smart

>Their heights suggest that, despite tall men being slightly smarter on average, the men of extreme genius are short (much like how women are on average smarter than men, while men dominate the extremes).
no it suggests that short men are more likely to overcompensate/ don't have anything better to do
>nietzsche was 5' 8"
more like ubermenschlet lmao

>overcompensate

Genius ain't a choice, pal. They're genetically superior, have nothing to compensate for, and couldn't if they tried. Genius can't be manufactured.

kafka was pretty tall for his time and pretty handsome as well. and yet his probably the most miserable writer in history. looks theory debunked

>They're genetically superior, have nothing to compensate for, and couldn't if they tried.
they're far less likely to get laid

What about girls though?

you think a base thing like getting laid matters to a man of true genius who can endlessly revel in his own mind? only unaware plebs are slave to their biological programming.

>you think a base thing like getting laid matters to a man of true genius who can endlessly revel in his own mind?
yes

then you've never met them senpai. I study math and most PHD students in pure math, who are legit very smart and often geniuses, couldn't give a single shit about getting laid. It's always the engineering plebs that are complaining

>I study math and most PHD students in pure math, who are legit very smart and often geniuses, couldn't give a single shit about getting laid.
the only genius of the 20th century was hitler
the only geniuses of the 19th century were napoleon, goethe and nietzsche

i doubt your STEMlords can hold a candle to them

I've met maths lads and they are pretty cool, doesn't worry about looks and are well charismatic

Not him but this post has to be an post-ironic attempt to amass as much cringe into one post as possible. If you believe what you've said I think it's best you remove yourself from the gene pool asap my friend.

milton friedmanlet BTFO

what's cringe about it

hitler and napoleon were the primary geniuses of their respective centuries

>brainlet
>he hasn't embraced based Sartre yet

Lol @ ur life

Simone was a top tier degenerate

Only a French whore could go for a cross eyed midget philosopher

>Tfw 5'7"

>Tfw quads of 7

>we should abandon our prejudices about short men, realizing they're a superior race
>abandon prejudices
>superior race

You are a fucking idiot, but not because of your height.

First off, your claim that short men are smarter is entirely without proof. You post no links or anything. There were plenty of smart men who were short, and there were plenty of smart men who were tall.

Second, even if short men are smarter, this may not be inherent to their height, it could very well have something to do with how they're treated. I imagine shorter men not being as athletic, outgoing, or getting laid as often as taller men (these are also conjectures but at least I'm admitting it). Therefore, they might turn in greater numbers to more intellectual pursuits. The greater number of smart, short men may simply be due to the greater number of short men becoming interested in these fields.

>tells someone to kill themself then runs off like a little bitch
lol

ourworldindata.org/human-height/

fucking manlet

That's true, women have bad animal values, they need to read more Aristotle

>
>Most intelligent women are either ugly or have this boring 1960's/70's nostalgia style that makes me hurl

I unironically love this aesthetic, didn't realize how universal it was until now. At least they let you know who they are at first glance, takes out the guess work

...

Kantlet

...

You ARE dumb as fuck. You just act like an elitist because you've been lurking on an Akkadian goat herding consortium for long enough to acquire their tastes.

i lik u

short people work harder because if they don't, they will never get laid. this raises the quality of their work, if only to be a means to an end.

t. manlet