Is this the most absolute work of art in the history of literature?

Is this the most absolute work of art in the history of literature?

no.

>look at me i have the most sick word game teeheeheheh

No, that would be Dante. It's pretty fascinating, though.

yes

More like work of farts

I want to kill myself.

>there is a "most" absolute


FW ranks among the "absolute" works of art, imo, but I wouldn't call it (or any other work) the best.

Dante would've wanted you to spend more time reading Dante and less time posting the same thing in multiple threads for several days.

this

Me? I haven't mentioned Dante anywhere for ages.

total utter work of art

Crystallic untiffilated flubbergust and jog-hutched noshdiggary, and nothing more.

>More like work of farts

No, the book that's just 'jew' written six million times is
It gets at the heart of art: jews

No, and it couldn't be anymore, regardless

>the most absolute work of art in the history of literature

If you quantify this as being the effect that a piece literature has on society, wouldn't the Bible win out?

>Is this the most absolute work of art in the history of literature?
>absolute
What did he mean by this?

Trying to make subjectivity objective.

I think he means that it is the abstract definition of literature: a bunch of letter combinations that may or may not give meaning to the reader

>a bunch of letter combinations that may or may not give meaning to the reader
If this was the case, then wouldn't any of the books in Borges' "The Library of Babel" fit the requirements?

Now you're gettin it!

Yay, I did a lit. Thanks Mom, thanks God.