This is objectively correct

This is objectively correct

It's not tho

Bottom being the best and top the worst I assume?
Also taco bell is on there twice.

/thread

>starbucks
>S
>not overpriced substandard cofffee and pasties

>Jack in the Box
>not B at best

>Subway
>S
>not C at best

There are so many things wrong with this image

It's actually on there three times, all graded differently. OP confirmed retarded

Taco bell should be in the F tier.

>this is objectively a badly made incorrect image
FTFY

>unironically preferring subway to quizno's

Eww

Subway is the most putrid food in the world

If you like BK, KFC, Taco Bell, etc more than Chik Fil A you are terminally insane and I need you to leave.

>chik-fil-a that low
>in-n-out being higher than 5 guys
>arby's not in F tier
>whataburger not in B or above

shit list for a shit thread.

It's Taco Bell compared to a Combination Pizza Hut/Taco Bell and a KFC/TacoBell

I've only tried 3 of these and I still know you're wrong.

Whataburger is literally better than all of those. What irrelevant fuckhead put together this garbage list?

I don't think I've ever seen a person on Veeky Forums as completely and thoroughly wrong as this

Subway is irrefutably trash

Sure, if you're a faggot

(You)

>Starbucks in the highest tier
>Chick-Fil-A in the lowest tier
Obvious bait

Who hurt you to make this list?

>Subway - S
At least put something that uses real meat there
also
>getting food from timmies

>chick fila shit
>mcdonalds kfc mid
>starbucks not lower

$1.49 fries coming through

Those fries look sad

Hi Texas

wow this is awful

I tried In-n-Out after hearing about 50 californians say how it was the best thing ever, it went in alright, then almost out again, fucking disgusting.

There is no such thing as an objective fast food ranking, it's entirely subjective and these threads are pointless because of that. Stop making them.