*dirties your equation*

*dirties your equation*
heh, nothin personal, kid

Tau fags should just neck themselves tbqh

>no equation will ever have a [math]\frac{\tau}{2}[/math]

Begone!

>

>he unironically uses tau
how small is your dick?

you might want to take this picture down.

>the absolute state of *vomit*

>muh trivial reparametrizations
kys shitters

>Math fan
Do you prefer tau or pi XD
>Mathematician
The question is ill posed both "numbers" are irrational.

>pi = 360 degrees

>areas.png
inb4 I was only pretending to be retarded

unit circle radius = 1
A=πr^2
A=π(1^2)
A=π

are you fucking dense?

Finally a thread I can feel with.

Same holds for [math] 2\pi i [/math]

mathematicians should just do like physishits
>throw in hundreds of constants and operators into an equation
>start renaming products of arbitrary constants
>set some constants to 1
>absorb constants into operators
>delete relativistically "negligible" terms
>introduce new notations to avoid the mention that they're matrices or vectors
>delete summations by introducing Einstein notation
>delete Einstein notation because the sum is implicit
>absorb operators into more operators
>get an equation that describes something that has very few terms
>"Wow what a beautiful equation"
See: Schrodinger equation HΨ=EΨ, Dirac equation (id-m)Ψ=0, etc

>mfw calc2 and quantum professors unironically use tau

Why don't we just come up with a new symbol for each angle? That should solve everything.

What the fuck are you talking about you double nigger

>SR
It can be literally derived from three basic postulates a) constant density of probability in times, b) superposition and c) there exists an initial state that can evolve in time

If you work around with plane wave and derive it in time and notice that it equals it's energy (h^2k^2/2m) you've literallly formally derived the SR.

>DE
This one is a bit tougher, but you basically only demand relativistic covariance and therefore change around the hamiltonian so it's derivative is linear in space as well in time and it fits a plane wave solution, then you get the necessary conclusion that alpha, beta constants have to be 4x4 matrices with similar properties like Pauli's matrices if you wish for E^2 = c^2(mc^2 + p^2) to hold and boom, Dirac.

I'd agree with you with something like non-stationary pertubation theory, fermi's golden rule or born-oppenheimer appproximation in quantum chemistry.

Correction: you don't even need plane wave solution to hold for DE derivation, but of course it does.

u mad?

you gigger nigger, did you even read the rest of my post other than literally one line? Literally 90% of the meme arrows include something that i remember that happened in the derivation of "the world's most beautiful equation" or SE
>let's set this ugly constants to now be called [math]\alpha[/math] or [math]\beta[/math]
>set c=h=1
>make -ih d/dx=p, E=ih d/dt
>make H = p + V
>avoid relativistic corrections
>create sigma matrix of matrices
>multiply these latter ones by a constant, lets change their name to gamma
>let's multiply this by derivative operator
>oh shit too many symbols, lets put a fucking slash through the operator to fuck up my handwriting even further to indicate the implicit sum of these with d
This may be slightly incorrect because I went over this a while ago, but you have to be retarded to not notice this pattern