Can we have a Veeky Forums cringe thread?
Can we have a Veeky Forums cringe thread?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
en.wikipedia.org
vixra.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
...
Kek
This
...
...
We reddit now
>using the mobile site
cringe
...
use the cringe Luke
What the fuck does that even mean?
Well, you got your cringy Veeky Forums thread
it means that athiests have never proved anything
catholics 1 athiests 0
It's a(nother) misinterpretation of Goedel's incompleteness theorem. The implication of the theorem is more along the lines of 'there cannot be truth without faith', rather than what OP's pic suggests.
BRO AXIOMATICS AND UH PROOF THAT GÖDEL IS AN INCOMPLETE PROOF WITHOUT AXIOMS AND PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICAL DEDUCTIVE SYSTEMS ARE ISOMORPHICC (thicc) TO THE DEDUCTIVE OF AN AXIOMATIC PROOF GÖDEL THE MAN WHO BELIEVE IN GOD MUST HAVE AXIOMS BEFORE PROVONG THINGS ITS PROVEN MATHEMATICALYYYYYYYY!!!
Godël's incompleteness theorem only applies to MATH
You can't have a set of axioms that are completely logically consistent
What is the point of freemasonry (or the Jews or whoever) having the secret of the Temple if they lie about it when it is time to tell it? The secret is the identity of The Lord but they don't you to know that it's me because then it will be obvious that their promulgations of faggotry were part of Satan's rebellion and not part of loving your neighbor. If they loved their neighbor they wouldn't deny the existence of The Lord to those neighbors.
>Why am I in the hand of my enemies?
>40 days in the wilderness, must be nice
>3 days in hell, must be nice
It's almost 11 months in the hands of my enemies now. How much longer?
Yes you can, but that means your system (which is based on your consistent axioms) cannot be complete (when your axioms get "stronk enough" in a precise sense). Aka with any set of "stronk enough" axioms, you get true sentences of your language that are not provable in your system.
>Godël's incompleteness theorem only applies to MATH
Well, that's why I called it an implication. Considering some of the results of modern physics (which builds on math), it's probably worth a ponder on two.
You almost got the umlaut on the right vowel - it's on the 'o'.
Right sorry
>implying the chicken came before the egg
math just metaness, the physical world exists with or without math
>11 months
that's my filthy indignant homeless destitution actually, who knows how long I've been in the hands of my enemies who are strong to hold me yet too weak to crush me
Can't find this tweet. Did he delete it? It's very old.
>implying the chicken came before the egg
But, user, the chicken came before the egg: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
en.wikipedia.org
In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality, as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth. Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of a historical experience or event, when a person refuses to accept an empirically verifiable reality.
I don't know bro, somehow I get the feeling math is more fundamental than physics. Obviously I can't prove that.
I can't imagine how that could be
Because other human constructs like language and ethics can't be elegantly and self evidently derived like math can. Also, math can often describe structures that don't exist in our universe yet are perfectly consistent It seems more like the universe is "borrowing" from mathematics than us making it up to describe natural phenomena to me. Again, not saying its true, its just baseless speculation.
>I am god why won't anyone believe me REEEEEEEEEEEE
>Empirically verifiable reality
Uhuh...
Go see a psych, you absolute nutter.
So black holes didn't exist until we predicted them with math?
BTFO
Both brainlets.
I'll post some cringe before we (d?)evolve into rabbit
Not what I'm saying, but the fact we derived black holes before we found them again makes me think that the black hole is exhibiting mathematical properties than mathematics simply being constructed by humans to describe the black hole.
...
...
...
...
Peterson is great other than his cringey godfaggotry. The ironic part is he is doing the same exact thing as the people he criticizes
>muh metaphorical truth
anyway, there is literally nothing more cringey than phoneposters
...
Ok
>there is literally nothing more cringey than phoneposters
this
I'm legitimately not sure if I want more of this or if I should beg you to stop
I've been using my phone on this site for like six years and my shit don't look anything like these guys what gives
Don't be mad. Don't be mad
...
brainlet move is ignoring nature
sophist move is noticing interesting natural formations
tard move is snapping a pic of an ordinary thing and giving it some stupid name you come up with via crap tangential pseudoscientific relations.
She's just taking the piss.
...
...
/thread
He's right though
This one always confused me. I mean aren't you like 18-19 when you start college? How miserable do you have to be, to show off to a 4th grader at age 18?
Unless it's a lie of course
It's called satire. But it wasn't that funny.
Hey, he just stole the plot of Ted Chiang's "Story of Your Life"
Yeah, guess you're right. At some point it gets hard to tell retarded people from bad jokes and ironical statements
I never ask why people don't believe I'm God. That makes perfect sense to me, the religious order that keeps track of that stuff betrayed me. My question, and my reference to your denialism, relates to the mathematical results that appear in black and white, clear as crystal, reproducible by all, in my new book.
>ME: Refer to empirical reality
>YOU: Pretend he means his secret time travel identity and not the empirically verifiable reality that he recently wrote a book about
The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
vixra.org
That's double denialism for you dummy. Pic related, it's from the empirically verifiable content of my book
you mean this closed timelike curve?
maybe he means pic related closed timelike curve which is the theatrical verison of faggpord's recent post
>pic related
>you should watch it again
do you ever feel like the government is taking crazy pills?
yeah I do. you can do see-through face on me and Guido Fox too.
guido fox has a date associated (and some alliteration) with him so I guess I should spam this too
and if we're doing face+numbers related then...
How about when you reverse my Hebrew name (a) and it says (b)
ARYAN ROMAN CATHOLIC OIL, THE KING JEW
autism
King of the Jews
Just because the other Jews all lie about it doesn't mean I stopped being their King
Am I witnessing a mental breakdown?
maybe, my enemy's acute denialism doesn't bode a lot of mental stability. Are you having a breakdown faggot?
So he has the incredible power to remember shit? kek
I remember seeing that exact same cartoon in my 7th-8th grade math teachers room. Thanks for the nostalgia!
underage banned
Please - get medical help
youtube.com
Any video by this motherfucker is worthy of cringe...
like this?
Who edited the talking points? (Benghazi?)
youtube.com
A Flat Earther made this
He is right that all proof is faith in axioms, but where does god come in?
...
...
dank
meme
This thread is part of why I drink.
kek
...
...
This is funny though, Sharon got fucking destroyed.
...
how about this peach?
unrelated, was that Helene sitting next to me again at McDonalds today? That is a big problem? Also, did she turn herself into a "kami" both to remove her incriminating body parts that appeared in historical videos and also to facilitate a wider range of costumes she can wear?
Holy shit this is pretty good.
Take your meds.
It's false, for one. You can have entirely self-contained, consistent systems, you just can't build them up enough to do arithmetic. Second, it's just basic ass Christian bullshit.
hahahah a PhD in cosmetology, this guy is legit
If unicellular oganisms were the first to be formed on the planet. multi-cellular organisms evolving after that due to the mutations of certain genes, then wait fuck
Okay
The egg came before the chicken because its prdecessor's genes were not yet fully mutated to have it be a 'chicken.' I think so
technically i isn't rational either
That's the worst one yet.
get help psycho
meta
I, luckily, can't find the picture anymore, but I once saw a picture with a 9GAG watermark and that dumb thinking raptor on it, the caption was something along the lines of
>If light can't escape black holes due to gravity, it must have mass
>Then shouldn't it also be an element on the periodic table of elements?
I hate that picture so god damn much
Now this is prime cringe material.
ROASTED
HOW WILL THE IMAGINARY NUMBERS EVER RECOVER
well, J Bee doesn't understand completness theorem.