Is there any serious study about nofap effects ?

>one study
Only meta-analyses are considered strong proofs. And the conclusion of that study explicitly mentions the fact that the sample wasn't global.

It's difficult to maintain it reasonable like every addiction, you're not going to do crack once a week and hoping that you will never do more so this the same struggle with masturbation.
Either you do it and this take a big part of your free time or you never do it and get liberated from those primal instincts which separates you from success

>asks for citation
>gives citation
>isn’t happy
hey faggot this thread is about nofap which is the original claim, which is where the burden of proof is yet he still gave some and you’ve given nothing

More like
>asks for citation
>gives weak citation
>doesn't find it convincing
Hey faggot this board is about *science* and math which has a method, which implies some proofs are stronger than others.

He looks like me, but short and ugly.

This is probably the most intelligent thing ever said about nofap.

>completely ignores the burden of proof
you're correct, this is Veeky Forums i shouldn't have expected you to not be a complete retard

You don't lift the burden of proof by giving a not strong enough proof. Come back when you graduated from high school.

this.
still waiting on your proof hypocrite, you did just say some proofs are stronger than others. as it turns out, some proof is stronger than no proof, so let's see yours dumb fuck

>Is there any serious study about nofap effects ?

Yeah man go to the top self posts in r/noFap.

>The only "benefit" of nofap is stopping NEETs from wasting all day jacking it 13 times to anime girls

This is one of the most true statements on Veeky Forums

Some of us who masturbate get certain emotions after they climax. I get tired and slow after masturbating, and can even get headaches sometimes.

Alright let me tell you be careful with no fap.
I didnt fap for 3 days and then spent a whole weekend with a [spoiler]girl[/spoiler]. On the second day my balls started hurting and I could barely stand up anymore.
Fucking blue balls its no joke if you have a permanent boner

>tired and slow
Well I call it calm and concentrated.
I cant focus when I want to fap for obvious reasons

When you nofap for a while you don't get those urges anymore, this is why I'm asking that and why this is a binary decision between never fap and always fap

I experienced that a lot because I was masturbating for hours and that's not so hard to handle

>as it turns out, some proof is stronger than no proof
There's a teapot orbiting the Earth because I saw it. Some proof is better than no proof. Your move.

your body just reabsorbs it. so basically it makes you stronger, like getting a free protein shake each day you go without fapping.

yes I did it for a month out of curiosity but I literally felt 100% normal and it's not like I became asexual after a week or something.
You still want to fap

that's not proof in literally any capacity you dumb fucking brainlet. the studies linking decreased chance of prostate cancer and masturbation aren't just anecdotal evidence. i mean this is Veeky Forums after all, filled with retards like you

also you don't understand the whole purpose of russel's teapot. it is used to help explain the burden proof, which falls on you in this scenario dumbass. you've yet to provide any proof because you have none, because you are wrong unequivocally

Lack of zinc can cause illness easier due to its galvanizing effect on the bodies defenses. The exact recuperation time is unspecified but I assume it to be the same amount of time as sperm recuperates fully within the body, this draining effect, and the loss of liquid can be made up again (in around four days), however over stimulation of ones nervous system can cause damage as well.

>not strong enough proof
so you can't read either lmao, not only did i not link that study, the burden of proof falls on you. so not only did he provide evidence when he didn't have to, but you have yet to provide any. i am not claiming masturbation is healthy, by virtue of this entire thread being about nofap the burden of proof falls on you.

you are too much of a brainlet to understand that clearly, so good day faggot

have fun with your nofap challenges

BTFO

r i p no fap desu You've got to be an ugly insecure manlet to do nofap

...

no, nofap is one of the most succesful memes played on brainlets, just like meditation or soy (nobody eats it but they believed it anyway)
there was only a single study that measured a 0.5% (sic!) free testosterone increase after the first week of nofap

To ascend you have to never fap with your hands again and only release your sexual tension with the intention to procreate

this and this

>you have yet to provide any
The burden of proof is on retards who claim fapping to BLACKED videos prevents them from having cancer. I can't prove a phenomenon doesn't exist. Without any meta-analysis, there is no scientific consensus, meaning zero conclusive evidence. This is as basic as the scientific method gets, but if you went to school instead of fapping to blacked.com, you'd know.

We are not supposed to do this apart from procreation (which comes during spring) so why this could be a problem to nofap several months ?

There was proof. Just because you possess too little knowledge about assessing scientific articles and base your judgement solely on the type of article the proof isn't invalidated. Your opinion on the matter, however, is.

Once or twice a week is fine. The people who need nofap are the people who are legitimately addicted and masturbate once a day or more. Getting horny once or twice a week is normal for an adult male

I don't know if you're trolling or legit mentally impaired. Assuming the latter, I'm gonna explain it to you in baby terms and reddit spacing.

Scientific studies are statistical.

Statistics mean fluctuations.

Some fluctuations are big enough to cause false positives or false negatives despite a square binary method.

Because of that, huge samples are preferred over small ones.

Another thing that matters is reproductions.

Reproductions is when several teams independently measure the same thing.

When independent researchers find the same results, it establishes a strong proof.

Meta-analyses are statistical analyses of scientific studies.

Meta-analyses imply that many scientists independently found the same thing in the most general conditions (for example, all over the world and not just in the US).

Because it'd be unwise and extremely pretentious to change society based on fluctuations one team experienced, lonely scientific studies are considered VERY WEAK evidence (barely above personally witnessing something with no proof it happened).

Very weak evidence means that what you are asserting isn't clear beyond REASONABLE DOUBT.

Without meta-analyses on the subject, there is NO SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS.

>the burden of proof is on retards who claim fapping to blacked videos prevents them from having cancer
except this thread is about nofap and all you've done is deflected. there is a weak correlation between masturbation and a lowered risk of prostate cancer, yes. so? is that your only point?
wow babby's first statistics class, this is clear because you think anecdotal evidence is the same as a case-controlled study

not masturbating allows you to store sexual energy and increase your life force. this has been known for millenia. sex isn't the same because the sexual energy is reflected and amplified by another person.

in practical terms it blunts your edge to be sexually satisfied without actual sex. life becomes more real. fantasy is a swamp that breeds mental illness

a spiritual practice is any regular exercise intended to separate your thoughts and habits from the control of base animal impulse and moves you towards a nobler, more human version of yourself .

so basically it is ok to fap to girls in bikinis (noporn just pictures) twice a week tops. (but now i feel like i need motion pictures of sluts getting banged)

>not masturbating allows you to store sexual energy and increase your life force. this has been known for millenia. sex isn't the same because the sexual energy is reflected and amplified by another person.
>sexual energy
>life force
the absolute state of sci

indeed, the absolute state when you think there's no such thing.

Nobody to answer this ?

I mean this

NoFap is a meme, although if you want to avoid being overly-sexual and treating things as sexualised, then it is good to limit masturbation. Otherwise the real benefit is not consuming porn. Porn is cancer for your intellect and focus, it's the same as aimlessly browsing the internet daily, except heightened and concentrated.