When will science find a cure for Autogynephilia?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=S0nYB2x7jcU&t=3s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Computer science maybe.

It has. It's called no-fap-vember.

I've gone into chastity for a month and that didn't cure it.

Isn't it just a version of an emasculation fetish

never, hopefully, traps are hot

youtube.com/watch?v=S0nYB2x7jcU&t=3s

...

Fucking hate how lazy animu is about traps. They basically draw girls and pretend they're boys pretending to be girls.

>chastity
That's going to make it worse, you idiot. You have to not touch your dick through your own willpower.
Conditioning yourself into becoming bisexual so you'll fetishize penises as well.

Traps are HSTS, not AGP, doofus.
Felix doesn't even look like a girl. He's literally a generic anime boy in a dress.

Literally looks like a girl apart from noboobs. Big ass girly eyes, girly face, girly haircut, girly body, girly hands. You'd never draw a guy like that.

Not at all, you are not aroused by not having a dick, but you are aroused by imagining yourself as a women. The psychlogist who described, this Roy Blanchard found 4 kinds of arousal that motivate those who want to be women 1) transvestic, wearing skirts and dresses
2) behavioral 3) physiologic- women´s bodily fuctions, menstruation and childbirth
4) anatomic.
The funny thing is that in the Wikipedia artikle that describes this, the list of symptoms is followed by quote of Blanchard describing a patient who has fantasies of being a futanari:
>"There also exist male assigned at birth people who report being sexually aroused by the image or idea of having some but not all normative female anatomy, such as having breasts but retaining their penis and testicles; Blanchard referred to this phenomenon as partial autogynephilia."

...

>accepting Blanchards theory as fact

Chastity definitely make it worse.

Locking your penis will make you want ride a dildo.

...

...

Who do you think was better at formulating a useful theory, then?

Am I only allowed to criticize it when someone has a better one?

You just snidely greentexted at me to mock what Blanchard has said and didn´t exaplain where you think he was wrong.

>Blanchard
>he

Never. It's pseudoscience.

Why contain it? Let it spill over the *chans and porn-sites, let the perverts pile up in the internet. In the end, they'll beg us for the dick.

No it isn't.

What makes it pseudo science? It's not really science either, it's just classification.

Selecting some characteristics of sexuality, drawing a distinction between members of a group and giving it a name.

exactly
if AGPs aren't agp, then what are they?

You would need an army to MULTIPLY a very large PRIME NUMBER