Prove me wrong, faggots

Prove me wrong, faggots.

Other urls found in this thread:

vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Your intended conclusion is false. What you wrote is ambiguous. You're misusing logical quantifiers. You mean for the final step to read (for all Y) e.g. (∀y). However, the proof that you supplied merely shows (∃y). In particular, you're confusing the rules of universal generalization vs existential generalization. You didn't start with "Let Y be some function". Instead, you started with "Let Y be this particular function". Therefore, you just proved a result with (∃y), not (∀y). Therefore, no problem.

Now go away back to /b/ or something.

So therefore I am right.

Yes, you are right that
(∃y)(y=dy/dx)
Happy?

I don't understand, do you think you are smart for applying the transitive property of the equality sign?

I'm sure that this discovery must have happened into your brain in the most retarded fashion and you tought it was brilliant but let me assure you, you are a retard.

>Prove me wrong
But what you wrote is correct since you specified y=e^x

wow congrats on figuring out what everyone else knew

What's a differential equation?

You're right, y = y' when y=e^x

Using lined paper should be punished. I hope you die in a fire, Op

[eqn]\frac{d^n}{dx^n}e^{e^{i 2\pi /n}x} = e^{e^{i 2\pi /n}x}[/eqn]

>faggots
Why the homophobia?

You dumb fuck

15 year olds go to

>why the homophobia?
that used to be funny haahaha...

>that used to be funny haahaha...
Homophobia was never "funny".

>y=e^x

whoa cool

what is the problem?
i dont understand
what OP wrote is true

>what OP wrote is true
I too have this problem

>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: 2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

you are right for y = e^x, and wrong for almost everything else
congrats you are retarded

4=2+2
4-2=2
Prove me wrong faggots

Is Veeky Forums overrun with bots? I've seen a few posts like this. Veeky Forums is probably one of the few boards esoteric enough for a bot to stand out. Maybe

Now that I think about it, the number of IQ threads and [math]0.\overline{9} \neq 1 [/math] threads are growing fewer, which is concerning to me. Maybe I'll make a bot of my own...

No, he's just this board's resident schizo who thinks he's God and that scientists are stealing his work, a bunch of retarded nonsense on vixra that he spams in every thread.

you're right

[math] y=\frac{dy}{dx} [/math]
[math] dx=\frac{dy}{y} [/math]
[math] \int dx=\int \frac{dy}{y} [/math]
[math] x=ln(y) [/math]
>integration constants
[math] e^x=e^{ln(y)} [/math]
[math] e^x=y [/math]

You just took a perfectly sound proof of a claim and gave an unsound one as evidence for it