What am I in for?
What am I in for?
Ryder Sullivan
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Caleb Ramirez
mechanics and the classical theory of fields
Christopher Roberts
Probably two solid theoretical physics books.
In German I'm more of a fan of Nolting, but you can't really go wrong. That being said, I doubt you'll end up extensively reading either of those books.
If you do, come back to Veeky Forums and make good thread about those topics.
Hunter Ross
>he thinks sci actually studies physics and isnt here to just wank themselves off LARPing as physicists and mathematicians since theyre actually all brainlets
Levi King
My father bought the complete series 20 years ago. I tried reading the first book on Mechanics, however I gave up after getting through the first chapter due to not knowing Calculus of variations.
Isaac Bennett
>L.D. and E.M
What kind of degrees are these?
Levi Gomez
They're initials
Christian Jenkins
(((Lev Davidovich Landau)))
en.wikipedia.org
a Nobel Prize in Physics
(((Evgeny Mikhailovich Lifshitz)))
en.wikipedia.org
t. Soviet Jews
Kevin Williams
>thinking you can avoid this in math and science
My condolences /pol/
Isaiah Anderson
A /pol/ack can accept Relativity theory.
Since Special Relativity was discovered by Hendrik Lorentz, a Dutch Aryan man.
Einstein just plagiarized and took credit.
Michael Flores
Pretty dense books.
If you don't know vector calculus then you might have some difficulties reading through.
Aside from that I've been told that they're excellent. I'm still approaching the knowledge to read them.
Ayden Garcia
yes every new theory is entirely built from scratch not using previous mathematics
Hudson Robinson
Ok, now anything without bohr, feynman, etc.
Aaron Richardson
Easy.
Niels Bohr was pure Danish, so Aryan.
3 scientists received a nobel prize for quantum electrodynamics
The Jews: Richard Feynman and Julian Schwinger.
The Honorary Aryan: Shinichiro Tomonaga
Exclude the 2 Jews and you still have quantum electrodynamics
Jaxon Watson
>bohr was pure danish
At least make your trolling convincing
Elijah Price
He is part Jewish. Damn it.
But Bohr model of atom was discredited anyways and replaced by more accurate quantum models.
>en.wikipedia.org
Adrian Phillips
But hey Jesus is Jewish.
How radical Christians solve that dilemma?
How to believe in Jewsus while hating Jews?
Jonathan Ramirez
Boltzmann, Minkowski, Witten, etc.
Also, should I even try math? just knowing Grothendieck alone....
Jacob Sullivan
>Witten
Witten String Theory is based on the work of 3 physicists:
the danish Holger Bech Nielsen, the japanese Yoichiro Nambu and the jew Leonard Susskind.
and 2 mathematicians:
the chinese Shiing-Shen Chern and the Jew James Harris Simons
excluding the Jews: Witten, Sussking & Jim Simons you still get String Theory
Joshua Adams
algebraic geometry was created by the jew Grothendieck & the french Jean-Pierre Serre.
So pick the french Jean-Pierre Serre.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Luke Hill
Boltzmann was ethnically Austrian like Hitler, so not a Jew.
>en.wikipedia.org
Minkowski copied from Lorentz and Poincaré
en.wikipedia.org
Lorentz was Dutch and Poincaré was a French.
Samuel Butler
Fair on boltzmann, but I dispute the idea that just because there were coworkers working alongside whichever, that they become unnecessary.
Minkowski may have utilized other mathematicians' work, but he did not copy, he applied, no different then any other researcher, simply applying all that came before them. No one else but he conceptualized the time dimension as 4-D.
Witten was the only person to develop the unification of string theory "M theory" so screw off.
The cumulative removal of jewish activity in physics in the 19th century would likely set us back 4+ decades. Would it be possible to do without them? Probably. Would it have taken longer? Definitely.
I'm all for celebrating normal european historical capability and research. But to deny that a group of people greatly accelerated both math and science simply because you don't like them isn't being honest. Also, Cantor was more than likely Jewish, and in all honesty, you don't have modern math or physics without set theory.
Seriously, the idea that someones coworkers were irrelevant to the discoveries is essentially saying, I know the conversations that the group had, and I know these other people contributed nothing, and the others could have progressed without them. Which you don't.
Aaron Hughes