>something from nothing

Do you propose the universe exists for no reason, having being created by no one?

Physicists have been hiding the Universe for years with their Definitions to keep their jobs.
Let c = 3 x 10^8 space / time by defining space: "The meter is the length of the path
travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/300 000 000 of a second."

1 / c^4 = 0.123456789... x 10^-33 time^4 / space^4
1 / c^4 = 0.123456789... x 10^-33 s^4 / m^4

Physicists are a joke.

>Do you propose the universe exists for no reason, having being created by no one?
Yes. But for some people they need a special creator to make them feel special and escape from the harsh reality that they're irreverent.

Holy shit. It spells out God.
Checkmate, the Lord.

WRONG

12345679
not 123456789

>From nothing
No.
We haven`t even figured out what the hell time even is, or why it is, or why it flows only in one direction, so stop crying about us having not found all the answers yet.

G = Newtonian constant of gravitation
d = Descartesian gravitation density

Base Formulae
frequency=[(G*d)^1/2]
force=[(G*d)^1/2]momentum
energy=[(G*d)^1/2]hbar
power=[(G*d)^1/2]energy
current=[(G*d)^1/2]charge

Dark Energy
energy=[(G*d)^1/2]hbar
energy=[(G*d)^1/2]e^2*z0
energy=[(G*d)^1/2]e^2/e0*c
energy=[(G*d)^1/2]e^2*u0*c
energy=[(G*d)^1/2]h*2alpha

Dark Matter
mass=[(G*d)^1/2]hbar/c^2
mass=[(G*d)^1/2]e^2*z0/c^2
mass=[(G*d)^1/2]e^2/e0*c^3
mass=[(G*d)^1/2]e^2*u0/c
mass=[(G*d)^1/2]h*2alpha/c^2

G*d every where in the formulae
yhwhallah.wordpress.com/

(their quantum's off)

Is that supposed to mean anything?

Attached: NuBSehz.png (1106x1012, 71K)

>the Big Bang was not an explosion
>it was the rapid expansion
That's what an explosion is retard

What's keeping something from happening?
Sounds like your version of "nothing" isn't really nothing since you're including some paradoxically something-based rule about something not being allowed to happen.
Nothing = no rules, meaning anything can happen and it won't be a problem because there's no impossibility limiting force in existence if nothing exists.

Attached: wow so hard.png (972x284, 9K)

0 = 1 + (-1)
Just keep the 1 and the (-1) separated and you will have something

That is like saying 0 is either 0 or x + (-x)

David Koresh said Universe (that)
solves the 7th & 4th seven seals.

c^6 = ?
c^5 = Gravity * Power
c^4 = Gravity * Force
c^3 = ?
c^2 = Energy / Mass
c^1 = Power / Force
c^0 = 1

? ?

You idiot, I told you keep them separate-

Attached: iu-2.jpg (600x600, 67K)

>something from nothing
...said no scientist ever.
Straw Man much?

wrong

Attached: inb4 jewgle.png (643x117, 11K)

This is a very simple and elegant way to understand something from nothing thanks user

There was never nothing, just a something you can't put into numbers because physics doesn't work there.

The big bang wasnt an explosion. Before the big bang, the universe already existed in a dense coagulate. It was so dense, there was no room for anything to move. Even at the planck scale, every unit of distance was occupied. Because there was no movement, there was no time, and because there was no relative distance, there was no space.

It's hard to imagine how a setup like this would occur, but the implication is that the contents of the universe already existed to a collective capacity still larger than the known universe and, at some point, a smallest part of existence disappeared from the dense coagulate thereby allowing movement and time and space which snowballed into a chain reaction allowing everything to move. The single instance of space "expanded" as movement was not bound by hard edges of the universe, a particle would escape the surface and then there would be one less particle within the density, allowing more movement until anither particle escaped the surface, allowing more movement, etc.

It is less an explosion and more like an implosion.

Even this however takes for granted that all of what makes a universe had existed prior to space and time, which means there likely was a universe existing with space and time before this known universe, and that such a universe collapsed and became dense. Why or how a particle would disappear from the dense coagulate is anyone's guess, much as how many cycles have occurred like this or even if a god created the original setup.

The universe didn't exist as a miniscule point that everything erupted from, despite what nigger degrasse tyson wouldcl claim on Cosmos. The point it did exist as a dense coagulaye was still bound by rules, and although there was no such thing as relative distance at that point in (non)time, it doesn't lend itself to assuming that it was a single small point of distance relative to our ability to judge size, and could instead be inferred as the schwarzchild radius for all mass.

Well if a fucking cult leader says so, it must be true

If there's nothing from something, there's something from nothing.

irrelevant to who, nigger?

If God is energy then he could create mass bois

nope, creates a different pattern

youtu.be/IcxptIJS7kQ?t=33m

Asterisk is not a letter

>nope
Not an argument

>143 B
Still something

serious question here
wouldn't it need a observer to trigger the big bang? since quantum shit needs it. on the other hand our laws of physic don't apply to a singularity.
can somebody enlighten me here or didn't we found out yet?
could it be that a 4th dimensional being was the observer (not necessary "god")?

>by defining space: "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/300 000 000 of a second."
you realize this was just to give meter a concrete definition right?
the definition they had before made light speed c +/- a meter or so, so they made a new definition very close to the old definition, but this time based on something that is a universal constant

sometimes i forget that actual, full grown adults are able to fall to cults

Why not?

Man that's One heavy Rock there Einstein
c^3 = Gravity * Mass Flow Rate

more, More, MORE

Attached: no wallpaper.jpg (1200x675, 5K)

Willy,

1) c^0 = 1
2) c^1 = Power / Force
3) c^2 = Energy / Mass
4) c^3 = Gravity * Mass Flow Rate
5) c^4 = Gravity * Force
6) c^5 = Gravity * Power
7) ?

?

This.

The concept of nothing that OP uses is wrong because it only makes sense within our universe, i.e. it can only apply after the big bang, not before. True "nothingness" is undefinable.

mass bois = fat people ?