*blocks your path*

your IQ changes all the time. It can depend on your diet or how much sleep you get, even getting hit in the head really hard can knock you down a few IQ points. Try eating junkfood for a few days and then try taking a test. Later, try eating healthy and hearty foods and take another test after a few more days.

I like to believe your IQ is your "Thinks per second"

If this were true you should eat healthy first then eat junk food later. If this is true you should've done better your first time

Attached: brainlets everywhere.png (680x514, 20K)

top left

but took me like 5mins
iq tests are retarded

why "should" you eat the healthy food first? Maybe we should perform a few experiments with different orders of healthy and junk foods?

Because normally the second time you take it you do better

o

But what if junk food prevents you from solving a problem, while healthy food allows you to solve it later? This observation couldn't be made if you ate healthy first. You won't miss the same problem if you eat healthy first, because you'll remember it.

Well I think you eat the same and take the test twice you will do better the second time because you know what you're looking for. If you eat healthier the second time you take the test then you are just going to enhance the probability to get the right answer.
If you eat healthy first then you are exposed to the test for the first time and will do your best. The second time you take it eating junk food you might be able to remember some patterns from the first time but because you eat junk food you will do worse

I feel like a brainlet what am I doing wrong?

Attached: brainlet.jpg (4032x3024, 2.31M)

Fucking image got flipped 90° reeeeeeeeeeeee

This is correct. It works elegantly and explains all cases. There might be other solutions, , but the first is entirely valid.
Hence

Wrong, top right
>A test which tests your ability to solve problems you've no idea how to solve is stupid

top right
ez

top right my man. Now give me a hard one

One second, I found this ridiculously hard IQ test a while ago. I couldn't solve any of them and my IQ is supposedly 150+ according to other tests

Yea, I can't find it
It was at least 4 years ago. I remember it had unusually huge pictures that were like, "find the pattern" among 100 numbers or seemingly random dots and shapes

That's okay but I never understand these threads. Someone just posts one midwit iq test question while the brainlets argue and the highwits explain the myriad ways of deriving the answer. Why not post at least a few questions?

Attached: is this hard?.png (635x521, 259K)

yikes

Attached: 1497274439498.jpg (360x360, 87K)

This looks tedious. It doesn't even look clever

At best you'll figure out what it means when shapes are placed inside one another and then have a huge system of equations
This is so tedious

Attached: another one.png (687x283, 127K)

This also looks a little tedious, but actually very unique and interesting

Attached: a third one.jpg (600x400, 34K)

least tedious of the bunch

Attached: question.png (574x560, 188K)

The first must be A as it's largest
The second D as it overlaps G and is disjunct with the remaining
The third G as it overlaps H and is disjunct with the remaining
The fourth H as it overlaps F and is disjunct with the others
The fifth F as it overlaps B which overlaps E and F is disjunct with C
The sixth B as it overlaps E
The seventh E
The eidgth C

Step 3 is wrong. G is not necessarily disjunct with F. However if G is not disjunct with F, G overlaps H, which overlaps F, and therefore G overlaps F.

Fucking yes im not retarded

so this
Is correct?

shouln't one of the answers be zero since the middle of the elephant makes the very concept of having a leg impossible?

Bottom Right.

Attached: 1520314330141.png (817x443, 34K)

Intuitively, 3

That's not the order I did it, but you can't argue this person is wrong
In fact, I would not be surprised if this is a set of equations for defining combinations of operators which flip and rotate the shapes. You can have different combinations of the operators, but there's enough information that any combination which satisfies the equations is equivalent to any other.

miyaguchi.4sigma.org/hoeflin/titan/titan.html

Knock yourself out

Here's an interesting solution. Define the operators
[math] F_L [/math] = flip the leftside about a vertical line
[math] F_R [/math] = flip the rightside about a vertical line
[math] G_L [/math] = flip the leftside about a horizontal line
[math] G_R [/math] = flip the rightside about a horizontal line

Assuming there are two combinations of these operators A,B which explains the transformation of the circle, square, and jar we have

By the circle and commutability of the operators these operators must be
[eqn] A = F_{L}F_{R}G_{L}^{m}G_{R}^{n} \\
B = F_{R}G_{L}^{i}G_{R}^{j}[/eqn]

Similarly by the triangle these two operators must be
[eqn] A' = F_{L}F_{R} \\
B' = F_{R}G_{R} [/eqn]
This suggests it must be true [math] A' = A, B' = B [/math] which works if [math] m=n=i=0, j=1 [/math]

Using these operators gives us the two variations of the jar

Attached: images.jpg (259x194, 9K)

3. Took me a few minutes to find the pattern.

is this the hardest one on the test?

what would a sub-100 megaultrabrainlet be doing on a science forum?

Well this board is mostly filled with people who have an interest in math and science, but not enough to actually study rather than shitpost. That could entertain a large variety of people

no

>what would a sub-100 megaultrabrainlet be doing here
mate, how new are you and where do you think we are?

i am aware that Veeky Forums is full of brainlets, but you see, i am talking about megaultrabrainlets.

four legs but five feet

I'm so confused, everyone agrees with this solution, but wouldn't the two circle halves be facing the wrong way?

The only one that makes sense for me is
> normal shape
> vertically flip both sides
> horizontally flip left, horizontally flip right, horizontally flip both (from step 2)

Which I don't like since I would have thought the circle and triangle behaved similarly.

So bottom-left?

In the third row, if you vertically flip the left side of the triangular shape, it works, but if you vertically flip the left side of the circle, it shouldn't give you the normal "C", but a flipped one.

Your solution is incorrect and flawed.

Here's one possibility:

1st row: Normal
2nd row: Both halves flipped along a vertical axis.
3rd row: Alternation between axis of flipping. First the left half is flipped along a horizontal axis and the right half is flipped along a vertical axis, then the left side is flipped along a vertical axis and the right side is flipped along a horizontal one. In that case, if the alternation continues, the left half should flip along a horizontal axis again and the right one along a vertical one, leaving us with the top middle to be the solution to the problem.

As pointed out before, the other solutions are not consistent.

But this leaves 2/3 of the bottom with behavior A and 1/3 of the bottom with behavior B. It's not consistent enough to be the correct answer.

It isn't, I agree, but it's the best I could come up with. The other solutions I've seen in this thread were completely incorrect.

My guess is that OP altered the actual test image to make it impossible to solve properly. If there's a consistent solution, I'd be curious to see it.

How can curved lines become straight????

Also, I find it strangely odd for a pattern-based test like this one to break the pattern and put a circle-based shape in the bottom left corner when it should've been a triangle-based one, which is part of the reason why I thought the question to be altered by OP.

This is alright, it's ADGHFBEC, although writing it the other way around is more natural to me.

it's actually top middle btw

and yes, it is stupid.

>miyaguchi.4sigma.org/hoeflin/titan/titan.html
Holy hell, even the verbal section is insanely difficult. I am determined to solve one of those number sequence problems at the end, I'll report back when I do.

On second thought, this appears to be an open test and I don't want to corrupt its integrity. Tough luck, brainlets.

It's the two

I almost missed the fact that the right side is flipped across a vertical axis as the left side is flipped 180 degree. Overall pretty easy

I mean flipped like a mirror not 180

And i mean horizontal not vertical. High af rn