What is the final verdict on Psychoanalysis?

>dude you enjoy teaching your children to chase and be chased because you have unconscious sexual desires for them

Jewish nonsense.

the surface is good with some nice insights, the depths of it are useless shit, and people who go there never come back

Dunning-Kruger effect is really strong here

Freud was on some good shit

His ideas have been entirely and utterly dismantled throughout the last 60 years..
his primary objective, admittedly, was to undermine western society. He's a dumb jew.

>I think psychoanalysis is stupid and pointless but I bet I know more about it than anyone...
Freud's ideas have formed the foundation of every major subdiscipline in psychological research and practice. You really proved that poster you responded to correct.

>His ideas have been entirely and utterly dismantled throughout the last 60 years

Only if you listen to the retarded and equally Jewish hucksters in psychology

No one is denying that he isn't a major historical figure. The question was what is the final verdict on him. The answer is that most of his theories were impressively unfalsifiable Jewish quackery. His technique, with adjustments, can serve uses in some places, but the large majority of his stuff is garbage.

He is still interesting to read and is recommended for anyone interested in psychoanalysis and who wants to read his contemporaries. Reading Freud is kind of like starting with the Greeks, but with psychology.

Yes, and just in the same way, in that the Greeks are not a collection of thoughts about a topic, they are a force that has shaped the process of thought itself. Freud is the same. It's not that we have rejected his ideas, its that he literally revolutionised the way we understand ourselves. It's not just that he got the ball rolling for psychology, he and a few others MADE the ball and we are still rolling it.

What's the difference between Psychoanalysis and Psychologie?