New York Times bestseller

>New York Times bestseller

> a masterwork of sheer momentum that rockets seamlessly toward its climax

STOP, PLEASE DONT HIT ME

>a timeless classic

>book was released this year

>an instant classic

>the book to end all books

>fun
>interesting
>exciting
>good
>thrilling
>entertaining

>Rated 5/5 from the Good Goys, IGN, and EA

>a force of nature

>the writer transports you to the world of [TIME] [PLACE]

>a tour de force

>an instant classic

>extremely readable

>audacious
>daring

>Stephen King

>"Like [established media franchise] meets [other established media franchise]" - Unmemorable name

>Spiegel Bestseller

>sexy

>jam packed

>Amazon Best Seller

>winner of the Pulitzer Prize

>A rollicking Pynchonesque oddity, a Nobokovian linguistic obsession, and a Borgesian unreality.

That would actually make me want to read the book

your in luck because it's an actual quote from the back of "House of Leaves." Except theirs said "Nabokovian" because they can afford to pay editors.

Litterally what aspect of House of Leaves is pynchonesque?

I dunno take it up with the San Fransisco Chronicle I've read like 10 pages of the thing.

About a fourth of that book was enjoyable. The author took a great premise and shit all over it trying to add depth and juvenile innovations

...

>groundbreaking
>delicate as a butterfly's wing
>told with rare understanding

> thought-provoking
> page-turner
> epic saga

I actually like Neil Gaiman but I just couldn't get into this book

>An American masterpiece
Why do americans do this?

>Biographical blurb on the rear cover next to a portrait photograph taken from an elevated angle
>Opera's Book Club
>Plot summary reads like a craft beer sommelier