The capitalism of social justice

Are there any books/essays dealing specifically with the insidious presence of capitalist/market elements inside of contemporary SJW elements, starting from their very conceptions?

Specifically, I would like to know more about the replacement of large/global/over arching causes (such as the ones derived from the great wars, "war on drugs", "war on terror", "war on poverty"), by micro-causes such as microaggressions and micro-racism, which are fought individually and through segregation rather than aggregation. I believe this, in turn, facilitates the process of increasing the market spectrum, a great triumph of late capitalism since even anti-capital revolutions become markets to exchange (social) capital instead. But of course this last part is only my conjecture.

Closest I can recall from memory about this is some stuff from Nick Land but he is rather enthusiastic and abstract about it (which is fine), whereas I would like something more precise in the history department. I don't remember enough of Hoppe to claim this but I suppose he kinda mentions it too? Thanks ahead of time to everyone who has anything to suggest.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=a4mjw2cVaDY
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/843165bf-1e69-3dec-873e-973fc8e604a5
buypichler.com/books/der-einzige-und-sein-eigentum-ego-and-its-own
currentaffairs.org/2017/10/silicon-intersectionality
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/michail-bakunin-god-and-the-state.lt.pdf
marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1900/reform-revolution/
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/chomskyeffect
youtube.com/watch?v=MG7y8J0DXhU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

looks like someone is ready to become redpilled

I wonder what the early frankfurt writers would have thought about this latest strain of leftism. I know many of them had problems with the leftist protests of the 60's and had a way of looping everything back to totalitarianism.

coordinated action takes more than shared conviction. it takes capital, including social capital, the accumulation of which sets off a race to the bottom.

there's a reason #BlackLivesMatter, a social media movement with high key private investors has taken off rather than, say, bands of blacks from specific neighborhood spontaneously self-policing and starting community gardens.

Much of the jargon of 'social justice' originates in the diversity consulting industry with people like Peggy Mcintosh. Secondhand echoes of Foucault and Derrida mixed in with generic feel good platitudes. Fact: intersectional feminist super star Bell Hooks is a voracious reader of self-help literature. You know, there's something distinctively californian about American managerial culture, family resemblances with new age gobbledygook, Silicon Valley, the be yourself, express yourself ethos. After the 60s, counterculture individualism became an instrument of postfordian management. New media and the postfordian work environment demand total involvement, so you need a class of professional busybodies to keep increasingly restless labor units in check. We are atomised, yet suffocated by the proximity of everyone else and the awareness we are under constant surveillance. We are assigned a role in the planet wide absurdist theatre event.

youtube.com/watch?v=a4mjw2cVaDY
bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/843165bf-1e69-3dec-873e-973fc8e604a5

no

Fact: most westerners 2017 AD are stirnerites without knowing it

eventually tho. not yet. we all have self ownership but not everyone is thoroughly conscious of it yet. blinded by religion, morals, politics, any imaginary spook.

also funfact: Max Stirner managed to get Evola butthurt. And Evola having no comeback or solid attack towards his egoism he just said he was a "jew" like the typical /pol/tard lol. Stirner really is the most succesful higher quality shitposter because he says it like it is.

>successful higher quality shitposter
>everything I don't like is a shpook

every ideology that rules you to be "that or this way" is a spook, yes.

This is what I'm talking about btw:
The Italian edition of The Unique and His Property has an appendix concerning reactions to and influence of Max Stirner's work. There is a chapter within it that involves Evola:

Rather, it took a genuine associate of the Herrenklub of Berlin, a ferocious ghibelline like Julius Evola (never registered to the [Italian] fascist party, which he despised for its “feminine” flaccidity), to come to the true conclusion, for only one was possible: **Stirner is a Jew**. Thus, without any foundation (but whatever could factual evidence matter in such a grandiose design?) we find again Stirner, as “father of integral anarchism”, included by Evola in the list of instigators whom brought forth “the destructive endeavour” of Judaism “in the properly cultural field, protected by the taboos of Science, Art, Thought.” They are, in the order they're invoked: Freud, Einstein, Lombroso, Stirner, Debussy (whom it is conceded to be a "half-Jew"), Schönberg, Stravinsky, Tzara, Reinach, Nordau, Lévy-Bruhl, Bergson, Ludwig, Wassermann, Döblin (introduction to The Jewish International, The “Protocols” of the “Learned Elders” of Zion, Rome, 1937, pages xix-xx; this is the slightly changed and updated version – and the name of Stirner is part of the update – of another list of the great co-conspirers, which Evola proposed a few months earlier: Marx, Heine, Börne, Freud, Nordau, Lombroso, Reinach, Durkheim, Einstein, Zamenhof, Offenbach, Sullivan – evidently he must have viewed The Mikado as a document of Jewish infiltration - Schönberg, Stravinsky, Wassermann, Döblin, in Julius Evola, Three Aspects of the Jewish Problem, Rome, 1936, pages 38-39).

Hahahahah calling the Milkman "a Jew" when he is whiter than you as a damage control is hilarious.