Is Evola actually not based?

"IQ is a social construct and a false god. I hereby proclaim the measurement of our esoteric principles and way of life to be not the lie of intelligence, but emotions- the seat of life, the reigns of a forest of pleasures. As far as we're concerned, IQ is, at best, a second ration notion used to create systematic inequality among the races and all peoples." - Evola.

What did he mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

institute4learning.com/resources/articles/multiple-intelligences/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Source?

I doubt he said that, but obsession with intelligence is one of the worst aspects of modern life.

*second-rate, fuck you spell check.

"L'uomo come potenza."

Sauce?

Weird quote in my opinion.

>Is Evola actually not based?

You still think terms of Left and Right if you wanted Evola to side with you on IQ.

Evola would tell you that it doesn't matter whether can IQ can be shown to be lower or higher. It doesn't fit in with his value system.

IQ is a sign of Scientism and Modernity.

IQ is our best means of measuring intelligence. Why would Evola attack that as creating inequality? Does he mean that it's not a real means of inequality, that true inequality stems from the metaphysical and from power?

Intelligence can only be defined when it is directed towards a goal. It must be measured as an ability in completing tasks.

What tasks? What fucking goals? To idolise iq above all else is to place blind roboticism on a fucking pedestal.

>IQ is our best means of measuring intelligence.

It is scientism you literal meme.

>Why would Evola attack that as creating inequality?

Because he is consistent with his ideological position and you want to find any reason that you can to legitimize your hatred of dem negruz; even if it means opportunistically electing scientism to do so.