>“Napoleon, the greatest of the conquerors, is a sufficient proof that great men of action are criminals, and therefore, not geniuses. One can understand him by thinking of the tremendous intensity with which he tried to escape from himself. There is this element in all the conquerors, great or small. Just because he had great gifts, greater than those of any emperor before him, he had greater difficulty in stifling the disapproving voice within him. The motive of his ambition was the craving to stifle his better self.”
“Napoleon, the greatest of the conquerors, is a sufficient proof that great men of action are criminals...
Justin Brooks
Ian Nguyen
that's an interesting perspective
Jason Walker
*murders you and your sister with an ax*
Andrew Martin
>criminals, and therefore, not geniuses
stopped reading at this leap of logic
Austin Williams
>doesn't continue to read the justification
Hmm
Oliver Phillips
There was no justification, only an extrapolation
Samuel White
You didn't get it
Ethan Gomez
That's one of the most reddit quotes I've ever seen
Oliver Thomas
You should go back there then, brainlet.
Owen Martinez
Genius only shows through action, coincidently the most action heavy people tend to be criminals, therefore this correlation. Of course, there is always a fine line between becoming a violent near sighted ruffian and a brooding timid monast.