Is this graphic correct Veeky Forums? Should we tolerate intolerance? If so, why?

Is this graphic correct Veeky Forums? Should we tolerate intolerance? If so, why?

Other urls found in this thread:

medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dictatorship-of-the-small-minority-3f1f83ce4e15
sys.Veeky
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

We should tolerate it to the extent we're able to counter it by rational argument and civil methods. After that point things get uncivil anyway no matter what, so we might as well be the first to become uncivil.

I'm Canadian and the new darlings of the left wing are muslims. Despite the fact that they are largely intolerant of progressive western ideal, we have to not only tolerate but accept them and their views.

Yet if a white Christian were to worship a pedophile and hate gays, women, dogs, etc. they would never be given a podium to speak, let alone placed on a pedestal and be immune from criticism.

For us to protect our progressive society, which was built by white people with western values, we have to not tolerate intolerant people who do not share our core values. Instead, Turdeau encourages them to immigrate or sneak through our borders by the thousands, because "diversity" (and they will be future Liberal party voters).

it's a great idea but it completely fails to mention that this only works if those who are arbitrating what is tolerant and what is not are completely just and rational.

...

/thread

>asking the "you can't live action or 2d rule 34 that porn" board about morals
you can tell anglo countries just don't read.

The argument for tolerance of muslims doesn't include letting their views become the majority; in fact, it doesn't have anything to do with their views at all, it has to do with them practicing their religion. In a case where no rights are infringed, they have a right to practice their religion and it should be respected.
Fuck off back to
With you boogeymen

back to your /pol/ cave

We should tolerate intolerance but we shouldn't tolerate neonazis