While it's nice enough and simple with a good connotation, like the other guy said, it's also cliche. A very typical beginner step in poetry and you should keep practicing, reading established poets, and studying various poetic devices and technicalities.
Again, this is nice, and simple enough to grasp, but as well isn't outstanding. You have enjoyable images and sentiments but what the other user before said stands true. You also have moments where your meter loses its strength such as L2 in S3. Might you try their singular forms instead:
>like a daisy, buttercup, or lily
or in L4 in S3, same instance:
>glistens in a few drop after
A little more consistency in your line breaks could benefit your flow, and I mist admit by S5 the poem begins to feel a little drug through the mud rather than pure inspiration. Then by L2 S8 you outright state the entirety of the purpose of the poem and images leading up to it, which is a poor choice in my book, and really shows to me that the poem should've ended before then. Keep working at this piece and keep at poetry in general.
Life isn't;
Then--
It isn't.
>Life is pain
Stopped there my fambalam
Oddly enough I quite like this; but I can only say because of personal choice. There's nothing technically outstanding about it. It's just well contained and impressive (in it's literal sense).
You're relying too heavily on your rhyme over your meter. I'm just going to alter a few of your lines from the start of S2 and I want you to notice the effect it has on reading them:
>Drops of fragrance drip
>beyond her brow and mesh with
>tears cascading to the ground.
Normally it's not sound advice to suggest ing words but I wanted to keep it as close to your idea while still establishing a sense of meter, which is the point of my changes. You've got a sense of imagery and keeping time, but now you should focus on how to construct a sensible meter which plays into the piece and draws the reader in. Rhyme poetry is good when done well, but metrically sound poetry divides the good from the established.
Really the same advice as I have given in the reply just above yours in the post. Small filler words are flexible in their use or lack thereof. In L5 simply removing 'a' greatly improves the established meter from the lines before. Busybody is one syllable to many and causes a fissure in meter when following with employee, try reading the line with 'busy-ish' instead. Little changes make a world of difference in poetry. The poem itself isn't bad, but you still have much to grow and learn. Keep at it.
I can't say I like dude in your first line, but I also can't say I hate the poem. You've got something here, yet the whole thing is lackluster in form (even considering it is intended).
Structurally sound. A little contrived, and unoriginal. But it's by no means 'bad'. I just wouldn't say it's good either. It's simply a poem.