Why haven't you read it yet?

Why haven't you read it yet?

I'm too busy spending one hour in one single paragraph of Nietzsche
Bye

I haven't read Jung yet.

Why should I?

Every professor has some sort of book, why should I specifically read Peterson's?

What makes him unique?

Peterson himself has said it's a badly written book (as in too verbose), that it could be half as long.

His new book is probably more ideal.

reddit spacing
not reddit spacing

>Makes his writing clear
>Reddit spacing

It is because I questioned your daddy?

that picture looks pretty post-modern desu

Why should I read it instead of Max Scheler's Formalism in Ethics and Non‑formal Ethics of Values?

Because he attacks gender pronouns.

I

Don't

Get

What

The

Deal

Is

With

Reddit

Spacing.
What's

The

Problem?

I'm waiting for his next masterpiece.

expensive and digital books are a meme

Was too verbose. Compare it with his lectures. Makes him look like a post modernist.

>books more verbose and involved than lectures
this is the case for literally every philosopher ever.

Ah yes, how stupid of me. Let me just go back to sorting myself out yes.

Btw have you read it yourself? I had some queries

...

For a guy who lives in a country with
socialized medicine, Peterson bitches a lot about socialism.

Stefan Molyneux does the same.

Why would I read this pop-philosophy meme when I can read actual books and papers on analytic philosophy of psychology?

That's because our socialized medicine is highly inefficient.

Are you really that retarded that you think socialized health care in any way aligns with most of socialism's problems