What's some good revolutionary literature?
What's some good revolutionary literature?
Other urls found in this thread:
We're redpilled here, sweety.
Start with Ronald McDonald's Culture of Critique series if you want the real truth
Lenin's diaries desu
Blake
wrong
we're nazbol
History of totalitarianism
Wrong. We are for Hitler and Lord Kek
PUT ON UR GLASSE
Get bogpilled, loser kids.
The State and Revolution by V. I. Lenin
We're definitely reactionaries here honestly.
The Bible
There's no good Communist literature.
The inventor of communism was one of the biggest faggots to have ever lived, followed only by mentally disabled faggots who try to succeed in being bigger losers than Marx was.
His children died from illness in the conditions they were forced in because even when begged by his wife to get a job Marx said no. It's almost hard to believe that somebody so worthless and repugnant managed to become influential enough to ruin so many countries with his retarded ideas.
Hitler should have won.
The Conquest of Bread by Kropotkin and My Twisted World by Elliot Rodger
If you want to go old school, read "The World Turned Upside Down" by Christopher Hill about the dissident movements that emerged in the wake of the English Revolution. Or if you want to go back further in time, read "Zealot" by Reza Aslan. He makes the compelling argument that Jesus of Nazareth was what we would recognize as a proto-anticolonial revolutionary.
The ultimate revolutionary act would be to learn Arabic and read The Quran.
You will fight for Allah and all that is righteous in His name.
The Outlaws at least von salomon actually has done some shit
>The inventor of communism was one of the biggest faggots to have ever lived, followed only by mentally disabled faggots who try to succeed in being bigger losers than Marx was.
damn...
my twisted world - elliot rodger
2083 a european declaration of indipendence - breivik
You want a REAL counter-establishment book?
Atlas Shrugged.
Book One.
Unironically true, sort yourselves out and make a good life for yourselves you larping losers
Burke.
No, why does everyone want to insert their political ideology? We're just loser arts students who can't get published and some NEET autodidacts
You imbeciles have zero knowledge of Marx lmao. Marx is the most important figure of the latest centuries with Freud and Nietzsche. Everyone with a brain acknowledges this. And I'm not even a commie. I sincerely hope you guys are teenagers.
Industrial Society and Its Future is where it's at.
d-delete or face my wrath
>being an atheist and commie is "revolutionary" now.
lmao
>revolutionary
>aint even blown anything up
pshh, try this
This is the correct answer. Sometimes I wish I never read it.
If you sincerely believe communists hold power outside China and Cuba you're mentally ill
Soros is a progressive liberal. Not a Communist at all.
/pol/ sincerely believes people trying to destroy capitalism, and the most ruthless capitalists, are on the same team
The Masque of Anarchy.
Anyone know some good eco-revolutionary lit?
Hi there, Jezza.
Bookchin, Ecology of Freedom.
For My Legionaries
...
Industrial Society and Its Future
>no one can into Nechayev
>Anyone knows of some good *insert ideology of choice* revolutionary literature
Revolution doesn't work like that. The only up to date is Industrial society and its future
...
*blocks your path*
Based anarcho-primitivists
Nothing revolutionary about him. His views are pretty common in society and he is mediocre at best at expressing them.
Tell me more about how blowing up random people will bring about societal change.
>random
Not so much
Vietnam? Laos?
Read Ellul instead. Kaczynski's work is unoriginal, cumbersome and cliché.
It depends on the society. In regular societies, a single source of strife such as guns being used to wipe out wave after wave of innocent would be dealt with legally, but in the mentally disabled American culture, no such luck.
Maybe you should read "You can't blow up a social relationship"
Second Treatise of Government
Industrial society and its future reads like a mathematical proof. I have yet to hear anyone refuting its contents. It's basically Marx Freud and Nietzsche all in one big equation of technological progress.
It is a brochure of 30 pages. Its clarity comes from its reductivism and as a consequence it misses a huge amount of subtlety and nuance in the issues it tackles. At best it serves as an middle-brow introduction to the subject, though it fascination with oversimplification harms it in this task. It definitely is not the be-all and end-all of technological and societal critique as some people tout it to be. Many better analyses on the subject exist, for example Ellul's The Technological Society.
Thank you for explaining what a manifesto is.
You missed my point. One should not read the Communist Manifesto and expect to have any understanding of Marx or the issues he works with.
"Fire in the Minds of Men - The Origins of the Revolutionary Faith" by James H Billington is dense and scholarly, documents all the masonic revolutions from French to Bolshevik and their ideological underpinnings. Billington was the US Librarian of Congress, he write beautifully.
"The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History" by Dr E Michael Jones covers alot of revolutions through history, including the Reformation and other religious movements.
>people trying to destroy capitalism, and the most ruthless capitalists, are on the same team
have you ever heard of a managed dialectic dude?
>The inventor of communism
Who this? Communism has elements of Illuminism, Masonic thought and Talmudic legalism. The intellectual lineage of Communism predates Engels, Marx, Hess etc by centuries. If you were going to point to any one person as being the inventor, I would say its Adam Weishaupt, though he is also just part of the lineage.
>the illuminati invented communism
my fucking sides
pussy
WAAH WAAH Bavawian Iwuminati is a conspiwacy feowy!
This actually:
Sorel's Reflections on Violence, user.
We, the Living. Also this
This. Veeky Forums is a Ceaucescu board.
youtube.com
/LEFTYPOL/ GET OUT REEEEEEEEE YOU HAVE RUINED MY FAVOURITE BOARD REEEEEEE
the moon is a harsh mistress
not all revolutions are leftist. see the American revolution, for example.
The American revolution is more war than it is revolution.
Left and right are historically relative categories. Just like everything.
Dianetics: the modern science of mental health.
its all in there.
*Paine.
We can narrow the inventor of Communism down to either Satan or Cain.
Seconding this. If you haven't got the time to read the German Ideology or Capital, at least read Wage Labour and Capitol (which explains the Marxist critique of capitalism) and Critique of the Gotha Program (which explains Marx's idea of socialism)
>What's some good revolutionary literature?
Water Margin.
I haven't actually read it.
Veeky Forums created leftypol you reddit mongoloid
Any citation on that? I've never heard that before.
Zero Squared podcast dives into this in their episode on leftypol. Basically in 2014 Veeky Forums was getting too Marxy and there was backlash from mods and users. So some guys from Veeky Forums founded their own board on 8 chan where they could discuss Marxist lit as well as other left-wing topics
That's why a lot of memes from leftypol, like Stirner and Nazbols, bleed over to Veeky Forums. Some of their jokes started here
Hands down, Maldoror.
I found nazbol and stirner on facebook, I think there's plenty of "bleeding out" senpai. I think it was through Pierre Tru-Danke
No, it was a revolution
What society is hardcore traditionalism 'pretty common' in?