Which one are you?

...

im wittgenstein x stirner
who is the third guy on the right and the last one? ted kazinski?

Where does "don't recognize any of these people tier" land me?

try the redpill. There are intellectual giants there. Try Kevin McDonald on the Jewish question, Weininger on how inferior women are to men like me, and Scruton who is the Proto-Peterson

What if I like people on both sides?

>Try Kevin McDonald on the Jewish question
>and Scruton who is the Proto-Peterson

Read the chart again, brainlet.

It makes you an indecisive brainlet.

I'm the guy who calls OP a faggot and tells him his chart is stupid shit.

>even considering Varg as anything

>he thinks Weininger isn't for /r9/-tier retards

Are you Jewish by any chance?

Is each guy meant to be the counterpart to the guy in the oppisite column, or is it just two randomly assembled columns?

I bet you couldn't provide substantial criticism on the works of most guys on the left. In fact, I bet you haven't read anything on them beyond Wikipedia blurbs and a few disparate, angry Veeky Forums posts.

Less than a High-School education tier. Even the most basic students of Philosophy should be able to recognize Chomsky, Wittgenstein, and Russell.
Not mention you should know Stirner and Kaczynski if you have spent any amount of time on any board other /a/, /mlp/, or /d/

t. Brainlet

No, I am Italian.

Are you a woman by any chance?

this
we should brutally reject such abysmal levels of ""discourse""
Veeky Forums's strength lies in its informed, stringent elitism, not sophistry

t. Brainlet

No, I am a man. Does this upset you, dear?

>It makes you an indecisive brainlet.
How does it make me indecisive? It's not like Bukowski and Rimbaud or Russell and Wittgenstein are somehow opposed.

Also, Chomsky is a greater intellectual than Stirner.

>It's not like Bukowski and Rimbaud or Russell and Wittgenstein are somehow opposed.

If you like both sides, you didn't get the Genius-tier's works. It's as simple as that.

It's not exactly hard to criticize Mcdonald or Varg.

>open image
>brainlet tier:
>Russell
>close image

>close image
>brainlet tier:
>Russell
>open image

high IQ right here

>tfw only recognize Stirner and Varg
Where a brain was only memes remain.

If you only recognized memes then you should have no problem recognizing Rimboi

How is Rimbauld a meme? He was a child prodigy of poetry.

Varg has made way better music than Ted though.

>dear
Behead those who post like this.

honestly stirner is way more brainlet than chomsky

Tolkein - Wittgenstein
? - Brecht maybe
? - ?
Bukowski - Rimbaud
? - Spengler
Lynch maybe - Some guy who got posted recently idk
Chomsky - Stirner
Varg - ?

Who is 2 and 5 down on brainlet tier?

>Tolkien
Tell me this was a joke.

>Veeky Forums's strength lies in its informed, stringent elitism, not sophistry
Dude are you new?
This whole board is a smoke cloud of sophistry and his never been anything other.

The only brainlets on the left are McDonald, Bukowski and Varg. The only geniuses on the right are Witty, Feyerabend and Rimbaud. Please go push your /pol9k/ idols and fitting-in memery elsewhere.

>im wittgenstein x stirner
Intelligent, nihilistic and with a wicked sense of humor?

and we're damn good at it too

The black column of emptiness between the two columns of faces.

Guenon was a genius

>Tolkien

Who is the sixth guy down on the left? Can't remember his name.

Why should I care about any of these guys? the picture itself is brainlet tier

Shhh. Don't tell that idiot about Bertrand Russell.

>nihilistic

>possibility A: user reads ol Witty and somehow thinks Witty is nihilistic
>solution: an hero

>possibility B: user reads the Stirner and somehow thinks the Stirner is nihilistic
>solution: an hero

You are no better than the brain dead losers who hate Nietzsche because he is “nihilistic” and he “is fascist”

Bye

Oh I forgot

>possibility C: user doesnt read at all (welcome to Veeky Forums) and makes cursory judgments on others because he read something another user once said and believed it
>solution: an hero