Why is this incest fetishist still widely discussed when all of his theories have been disproved?

They havent been disproved, its still up in the air, its just theory.

Because those who run the new world order like to keep Jews and international bankers in "power" as their smokescreen scapegoat, to distract the public with a tunnel vision of Jewish dominion, when really it is all part of a planned strategy to keep the real rulers completely behind closed doors.

Jews in academia promote and celebrate him because he is one of their top tier subversive propagandists along with Marx and people like Boaz and Gould.

Is the Hasbara resorting to 90s era Icke posting to keep attention off of jews?

Oh yes, you're really onto their plot, aka their media drama to keep you distracted. Haha! As if you would know the real players you fucking dummy. The truth is much, much scarier than that.

It's the truth, how about you even attempt to educate yourself on the matter.

The JQ is openly discussed by academics across all history, many of them speaking out against jews. It's not a secret, it's fucking drama. Its your version of the Kardashians, to keep you busy with petty nonsense that doesn't lead anywhere, while the hidden players run the world on your behalf.

Fuck off with your wishy washy bullshit.
The oedipus complex doesn't exist.

Well for one thing, he was a really good writer. His stuff is actually entertaining to read.

So you are confirming that you're losing the information war and the new plan is to regurgitate 90s conspiracy theories to block the breaking dam of goyim knowing? Interesting.

>subversive propagandists
It's funny that people like you fixate on some supposed Jewish subversion scheme, when the historical reality is that by far the biggest thing that subverted the West was WW1, which was caused not by Jews but by the stupidity of various relatively autocratic, militarist, and certainly non-Jewish governments.

Jews were very influential within the governments and societies involved with WWI, what are you talking about?

That's your interpretation, most people feel more comfortable in their baby level entry into the truth, and that's fine. You'll realise eventually that the real powers in this world do not operate on the same basic tribal paradigm you're using to understand the problem. The Jews have had many uses to them, as scapegoat, as test subjects, etc. I bet you don't even know who Hitler was working for...

They were more influential per capita that most ethnic groups, but they did not play any sort of key role in bringing about WW1. Keep in mind that the governments mainly responsible for WW1 were those of Germany, A-H, Russia, and Serbia - and those were probably the least Jew-influenced ones.

If you can't easily decode ickes seemingly supernatural treatise into the real message he is trying but not allowed to openly convey then I don't think you're cut out for this line of inquiry.

And yet they wonder why they have a reputation for being liars.

Why the fuck do you retards keep arguing with these neo-Nazi faggots?

TALK FUCKING LITERATURE

he's only half wrong. zionism is the reason why israel was created as a state, and stalin of all people was gunning for it because it meant that self-determination wouldn't be geographically restricted (i.e. it didn't matter that the current population identified as X, it matter that you could raise a population of Y who wanted to overwhelm them, like Lithuania or anywhere else he had an eye on)
the inception of the state of israel is a subversion scheme, and not even one that all jews are historically okay with, since it's mostly powered by zionists (of various religions) who feel a religious state for the jews is necessary (whence the strange american christian backing, because they too want to force the hand of god towards the final judgment).
israel wouldn't have existed if the self determination proposal wilson had carved out went through. it didn't, and it not going through coincides with a lot of openly zionist marches and demonstrations and protests which was largely backed by people who have no problem mass murdering people and/or jews.

See? It's set up so that you will dismiss anyone who tries to point you in the right direction. They knew that this kind of platform would have been perfect for our uniting, so they have undermined it brilliantly. You're a useful idiot to them, user

>his theories are unflasifiable
In other words his "theories" [hypothesis] are pseudo-scientific.

the treaty of versailles is literature

Yes, and we should ignore them and every other philosophical idea ever put forward about how to understand ourselves and society. It's all pseudo-scientific nonsense.

You don't know what you're talking about. They played a major role that began with the media stoking of tensions and ended with their own victory document. Please, hit the books before you jump into these convos m8.