Can somebody explain what the fuck is going on here?

Can somebody explain what the fuck is going on here?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CwC1jYwOP3s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>you will look and feel like shit after having a kid
heh, thanks Jesus

jesus was an SJW
>dont kill whores
disgusting

Thankfully Veeky Forums is a Scientology board.

I'm confused, he's saying that they have no authority over him without divine power giving it to them but if so, how does it follow that the person turning Jesus in is guilty of a greater sin?

Well, first off, that's two different places in the Bible (Luke 23:28 and John 19:11), so right off the bat, I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Second, why not just read the rest of the sections to get more context? Luke 23:31 basically summarizes what the first section means: "For if they do this when the wood is green, what will happen when it is dry?" That is, this barbarism in relative peace suggests utter chaos if and when things go poorly.

In the John excerpt, Jesus is speaking to Pilate. This is relevant because Pilate is the figure who would eventually agree that Jesus wasn't guilty of the crimes he's accused of. So, it's telling one truth and foreshadowing another:
1) Pilate has power because of God, not because of anyone or anything else.
2) Pilate's current sins pale in comparison to the greater sin of Jesus's own people betraying him. To phrase it differently, Pilate is simply going to do his job; this becomes clearer when, even when Pilate wants to spare Jesus, he is forced to approve of his execution.

But isn't the crowd only doing it because they were destined to?

It's all such contradictory nonsense, isn't it?

If this isn't just some bad writing, the followers of this death cult are worshiping an incoherent nutter.

I'm the user you're responding to, perhaps his point is that while the people he is subject to has divine authority while the one turning him over does not. But then wouldn't the issue be if Judas were trying to execute Jesus?

this is some good bait

>death cult

o i am laffin

>this out of context passage doesn't make sense out of context, therefore it is all shit

i wish you would kill yourself

In the book of Judas, it's explained that he was only doing what he had to, Jesus told him to do it.
Questions of determinism in my bibble? All the Gospels are influenced by their Greek interpreters.

How is it not a death cult?

Do a better job of putting into context before you kill yourself, 'kay?

>book of judas

kek

Eh, it's not as simple as that. At least in the OT, God made it clear that although much of the world and its people were subject to determinism, the Jews still had to make the right choices, as hard to believe/understand as that might seem. That seems to be what's implied here: Pilate fulfills his role in destiny, but the Jews who betrayed Jesus and position themselves against him could've still done something differently.

Regardless, the OT has numerous cases of the odd effects of determinism and God's omniscience. See, for instance, all of Samuel (and, I suppose, Judges+Ruth) to see how God might position one person highly, knock them the fuck down, and replace them with his golden child (i.e. Saul gets fucked, David is the hero). Job poetically describes a lot of this, too.

As a side-note, was Jesus Greek?

Written by Greeks. The character was Jewish though

>the character
You are going to trigger people

Imagine being a bitter jealous dyke whose entire existence is nipping at the heels of men greater than her. You have practically no existence and I recommend taking away the one you do

>How is it not a death cult?

Duuuuuh maybe because its ultimately centered around resurrection, redemption and salvation you stupid cunt. If you're defining it as a death cult because its founding story has death in it then what belief system isn't

Here's the difference between you and those you hate. They are building something, they are trying to establish meaning and a lasting productive society. They are looking to exert their place in the world and how to reconcile others into it.
You on the other hand are a pure leach, you think through men, you write through men and yet you hate men. There's ultimately nothing at all fertile about you, nothing can possibly come from your existence. You breath and consume like a plant and nothing more. Can you even imagine for a moment if you were removed from all this, if you were a being on an island remote and alone what you would make of your time? I bet you can't because the very notion of independence for you is terrifying. The moment you become as a man would be the most horrific thing imaginable because only then is your mediocrity, your emptiness and your pointlessnesss revealed to yourself fully scathingly and irrevocably. You fucking dog. You yapping fucking bitch

man i wish i had the power to rile up people like you do
look at these boys go

just say a controversial thing or a stupid thing and everyone will get angry at you

I read men-greater-than me all the time.
I come to pass on to the lessermen of Veeky Forumsb what I have learned, for my love is greater than Jesus.

I already exist to some extent in your mind, and completely in mine. Are you jealous of this?

This is what I'm talking about. It's a cult centered around the afterlife. Escaping this life is the Christian goal. It's death that brings you to immortality and "righteousness" and so forth. However much you may like this world, your true life starts after death. The Earthly plain is but a waiting room where you're supposed to do what you're told, don't kill yourself, unless the sovereign puts you into battle, and go to heaven in gods time.

It's a charlatan's piss tonic

>Yet you hate men
Stopped reading there. You know nothing of me, so stop pretending you do.

If Christianity was based around the afterlife there would be no need for the resurrection, what you're describing is more of a naive reconstruction of Greco Paganism. There is very little reference to heaven in the Bible the Kingdom of God on Earth is far more of a central concern than anything concerning an afterlife.

>"I come to pass on what I have learned to Veeky Forums for my love is greater than Jesus."
...
>The Earthly plain is but a waiting room where you're supposed to do what you're told
I don't think the bible says that at all...

I respect you, I am a random user. I will tell you that everyone else might have the upper-hand in the argument, but don't lose hope. You seem to like learning, and that is the best trait you can have, keep searching to improve, you are impressive for that.

Good soyim

Why? That's a correct usage of the word. "Character" doesn't strictly imply "fiction".

Whats there to fucking know? You're a runtish carpet muncher who likes to tell people she rides a bike. You're a non-entity and your childless passing will go unnoticed

There's nothing wrong with wanting to learn. People can change greatly over time with his mentality.

She doesn't want to learn anything, she's been posting here for years and her thoughts have never evolved past the infantile pseudo-existential liberal she arrived as.
All she does here is spurs reactions because she knows its the closest she'll get to honest self reflection

Oh, I've been on Veeky Forums a while but I don't browse Veeky Forums very often, I thought this guy was new.

>woman thinks that a dated and shabby English translation is solid basis for critique

IMUHGYN MUI SHAWK

For the second one the likeliest interpretation is that it was not only by the will of Pilate that he was appointed adjudicator, so the blame lies lighter on him than on the person that handed Jesus of own agency

Is that person Judas? Isn't Judas destined by God to hand him in? Didn't Jesus tell everybody about it too?

I haven't read the Bible yet double nigger motherfucker I'm halfway through the Odyssey

is she really a girl?.

why are you in this thread then?

Spoiler alert Jesus dies.

Also, what does "he died for your sins" mean? I never unde

>dyke is upset that religion she doesn't believe in condemns hell to a hell she deems fictitious
Or is she fretting about rural and suburban retards coming all the way to her urban slum to take away her dyke marriage?

>has been aware of a literature discussion forum for years and xer's ecclesiological analysis is still at the level of a wikipedia-skimming redditor

Do you read?

I have changed actually. Politically I started as a disappointed progressive, I read. I grew. I inched towards Chomsky's leanings and now I see even those as untenable. I've learned philosophy beyond what I ever was interested in. And no one has convinced me to become a "born-again" Christian

>Liberal
You're the liberal, fool.

I have taken this into account. It kept me a Christian for a few more years. Here I am mostly teasing. I admit it.

Anonymous kept picking at me and I came out as a woman some years ago. I am lesbian.

I'm not marriage minded. Anarchist and all.

I was a real bible reading Christian, user

So, are you like, a girl girl? Do you want to be friends?

>Anarchist and all.

Jesus Christ it's brain-seeping-from skull retarded
>Everybody will be okay with anarchy because they will have as much stuff as they want and everybody will know that anarchy is best so nobody will question and try to establish a hierarchical system ever ever, also nobody can coerce or subjugate another person because the good guys will beat the bad guys somehow

I have always been a female.
I don't hang out here much these years, but I'm friendly.

You have a twitter? You must have a tumblr?

>Anarchist and all.

Everything about you logically proceeds from this pithy proposition

> I inched towards Chomsky's leanings and now I see even those as untenable.

Such a crying infant even her politics is nothing but a hysteric dramashow dragging on the legitimate positions of others.
Like a child that just screeches to its mother, its incapable of actual formation of desires to compromise towards hoping others will make them up for her

Jesus. This woman keeps appearing although she supposedly quit this forum like 4 times by now. Talk about resurrection...

Try reading about it sometime.

Stirner
Proudhon
Bakunin
Kropotkin
And so on.

Neither, nor reddit.

I sincerely hope you get raped so someone takes some enjoyment out of your miserable existence

Do you have anything at all? It can be text-based I don't care.

cool it, man...

Read Hobbes, but if you haven't heretofore been convinced of the evident fact that people in anarchy naturally associate for the sake of security then he won't be able to teach you common sense.

Crazy psychopaths, resentful misantrophes and zealots will roam an anarchic world and there will be no authority to stop them until people decide that there shall.

you have no understanding of christianity. recall that suicide is a sin.

Just giving her a taste of what the reality of Anarchism would be like for her. She has no appreciation for how much the structure she spits on protects her

youtube.com/watch?v=CwC1jYwOP3s

28-29 is probably referring to the second coming.

>and so Rome was founded

Good story, well told user.

what would an unaberrated scientologist do in this mest event?

>live in anarcho-communist utopia
>always in privation of some commodity you're hankering for and could have at your disposal in a market economy because people don't find making donuts any more fulfilling in socialism and nobody buys that a cluster of donuts and a single donut are both worth the same for having been produced in the same interval of time so people always excuse themselves from working at full efficiency
>chad pins you down and turbofucks you
>kinda like it
>oh but wait I'm a lesbi this isn't fair!
>whoops no cops we killed all the pigs teehee ;)
>some actualy sociopath tries to rape you
>fractures some bone of yours in the process
>wound is infected
>nobody wants to work in a fucking pharmaceutical plant when they could be doing something less hazardous, labor is worth the same if it takes the same time after all
>die of infection

R-r-rh-rh-rh-Rrrrread!
Read up on anarchist theory.

No.

I know it is. It wasn't at first and martyrdom was looked on as a great and holy thing, still is to some.

>Read up on anarchist theory.

I'd finish the Greco-Romans before deciding to shrivel up my brain with confabulation desu

Do you want to make a fake account I need someone to talk to, nothing more. Your decision though.

Get a hold of yourself man, fucking hell

I have no one to talk to. The only reason I use Veeky Forums is to talk to people.

>Duuuh martyrdom = suicide

Imagine being this much of a hard thinker telling others what to read

Stop it, please.

:(

>People
They're more machine than men now.

Talk to me about what? Here and now.

It is a kind of suicide, and gloomy impoverished congregants used their example to justify their suicides, till the church deemed it a sin. They were to valuable a labor commodity to let go. Also too sad to bear for the Churchy folks.
You jump to conclusions too much.

>Her anarchist delusion gets disclaimed by a few perky shitposts
>Quits the thread because she doesn't want to accept that she's read thousands of pages of drivel and got duped by it

You need me to go into details on anarchist theory ITT?

Ok that's alright. What are your beliefs on life, describe life. I respect you because you are unorthodox and that's why I want to talk to you more.

>till the church deemed it a sin

Fake news. The Church has been praising Martyrs all the way up to Maximilliam Kolbe during the holocaust. I'm sure it comforts you to tell yourself that those who literally gave their lives for others were just as selfish and empty as you though

>You need me to go into details on anarchist theory ITT?

Yeah I'm ready for a laugh.

Re

Well, the best of luck to you butterfly. Good luck with your learning, don't let Veeky Forums get to you they are pretty mean. Bye.

If you're actually heading out and away from a computer, bye.
If not, you could start a thread on anarchist theory or something.

Yes actually, you have the opportunity to strike a fucker dumb by presenting a form of anarchy that is
>sustainable and enduring
>conducive to human utility
>does not depend on hierarchy that is just very decentralized or a pastoral lifestyle imposed worldwide

>It's a charlatan's piss tonic
Why? Just because it's not true?

Don't forget, would not immediately revert to hypercapitalism/Mad Max

>keeps focusing on the afterlife department disregarding the ethics that Jesus taught
Jesus is called the first hippie for a reason. Funny that most ideologies that claim to be progressive focus on a very christian concept of love more akin to agape (but completely bastardised of course).

Do anarchists just want gay feudalism btw?

They don't want anything. They LARP like they have some secret "theory" but they're like a child in the backseat of a car complaining.
Put them in front of the wheel and everything immediately falls apart

>anarchist theory

The LARPing crowd are individualist teens who get their anarchy from a dictionary and some punk rock albums.

The ones who call themselves "ancaps" and "agroists" will actually be getting this. They're just capitalists though.

So with words you want me to not only demonstrate sustainability but to prove endurance? It can only happen when all hands move towards it and finally see it for what it is. The endurance would come from it's decentralized nature. Nouveau-tribalism? modernist-pastoralism? The words don't matter so much as the way we can live *without* money or barter/trade. The incentive for life is cooperation.
How much did your mother pay you to do the chores around the house? How much did you pay your grandma for the holiday meals? Who did the dishes afterwards? How much they get paid for that? Life does, quite often go by without commodification. We just need to widen the scope back to normal.
And in doing so, people's minds would change. The brain is quite malleable. The children raised in a world that doesn't require the fear incentive, the cheat your way to the top or die trying mentality, the absence of a state that glorifies violence as patriotic. These would be a generation of large golden people.

I don't describe utopia, I dream of things betting better. It can happen.

I never did any menial "chores" my mother and sisters handled all that because its women's work while I and my father had more important shit to be doing

>These would be a generation of large golden people.

And if you're wrong there's no one to stop you getting fucked up the ass by Abdul, interdasting

Are you implying police stop rapes?
Perhaps you, or this Abdul should be asking who is going to stop me from killing you/him

Well? How much he pay you? Nothing? Below minimum?

>Are you implying police stop rapes?

Yes the public service system which physically restrains, isolates, investigates and prosecutes any large well endowed negro would want to slide his dick all the way up your unlubricated bleeding asshole is a fairly reliable deterrent.
I take Freud's view on this matter. Humanity's desires are too ultimately and fundamentally fucked for any secular society to survive. I think religion and Christianity specifically is the only thing imaginable that could save us from extinction.

Well your thinking is fucked.