AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHRRRAA...
Ethan Reyes
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Oliver Wood
The scary book iz scary lole!!
Jace Rivera
If books did this
more kids would read books
Ryan Martinez
>tfw I actually almost shat myself when I saw this as a kid and was scared to open books for weeks
Ryder Jenkins
Unsurprising to see such lackluster CGI from one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Grayson Rogers
it's from a video?
I thought it was just a picture LOL!
what is it from?
Dominic Green
Matthew Rogers
It's from Caligula
Sebastian Nguyen
That image shill makes me physically cringe
Hunter Thompson
well then go back to r*ddit
Wyatt Foster
infallible
Dylan Allen
That list is literally a Reddit list.
James Torres
It has Hypersphere on it, dumbass.
There was an actual list with most of those books on it, but over the years people edited it to switch them around to random tiers.
Kayden Cook
you are literally a r*ddit migrant and you need to go back
Elijah Price
holy shit
Henry Perry
LMFAO tbqh
Justin Morgan
/tv/ had the better post 2bh
Robert Price
>Hypersphere
hahahahaHAHAHAHAh
what a joke
Kevin Garcia
...
Noah Harris
I read it, I found the author to be too preachy.
He kept going on and on about some unforeseen terror.
What a faggot am I right?
I can't be the only one who actually read this book.
Brandon Bennett
This happens every time I buy a second hand book, holy shit, I'm getting fed up with all these magician pranksters
Landon Carter
When did you realize that Digital Sincerity was the next big thing?
Connor Phillips
yeah I mean it looks cool but it is annoying as fuck to read when they do this
Nathan Cook
They're on discount though.
If I buy some reading glasses will it help me cope?
Nicholas Adams
fucking kill yourself reddit tourist. /tv/ is the absolute worse board on Veeky Forums filled with witless tryhard underage memer and blatant shills
Juan James
bump