What the FUCK???

What the FUCK???

sometimes a man just has to attempt to jerk his wiener off to kiddie porn to make sure he still doesn't like it

no pedo

he is right though, not everyone who watches lesbian porn is a lesbian, for example

That doesn't make sense...

Some of them are just criminal investigators.

Wonder why he brought it up. Is he about to release a novel in which a Matthew McConnaughey role defends a guy about to be unfairly sent to the clink for watching kiddie porn? ("Now imagine she's legal."?)

Good man, it's about time someone stood up to the rampant pedophobia

I like this guy.

>3 year old article after which Grisham lost all mention in the media

>My anons, we must not regard what the many say of us: but we shall find that the old stereotype is unshaken as ever. Could we agree that they are not the same?
>Certainly

Socrates tier reasoning desu

Fear of children?

It's about the aesthetics

yeah

>traps aren't gay

thank u based grisham

In some countries hentai is considered child porn. Wanna go to prison for watching drawn porn?

Explain. Makes perfect sense to me.

>indulge my pseudo-pedantry

Not today, friendo

what terrible countries to live in where a man can't enjoy loli in his own home

Looks like he should be in jail as well.

...

Good post

Truly /myguy

He can kiss his freedom goodbye

Hmmm... all of a sudden... I wanna try out reading a John Grisham novel

>we must imprison him for not adhering to our baby boomer cultural norms
this is why roasities are trying to through coups in this country, no one dares try to reign them in or the cucks will screech at you.

It's literally only roasties and nu-males who are against it

Severely underrated comment.

Not all pedos are child molesters

>STRUGGLING AUTHOR PENS ARTICLE ON JOHN GRISHAM
>Natalie Robehmed, who last year made only $12,338.49 and relied on her parents on three separate occasions to pay her rent, has reportedly written an article about something some other author said. Sources at this time say her financial worth has no bearing on the rest of the story, but that she will likely suck your dick for an extra $20.

>we have prisons now filled with men my age, sixty year old white males who never touched a child, never would touch a child
Big ole balls on this guy.

Why on earth would he say that? Creepy dude

This is the case. Every person I have ever met, excepting those two classes of individuals, has agreed with Grisham on this. Usually the counterarguments consist of shrieked tautologies like "CHILD PORN IS CHILD PORN!"

false analogy
should be
not everyone who watches lesbian porn engages in lesbian sex, for example
:)

Kind of like how homophobia is fear of homogeny?

Are conservatives fine with people watching child porn? You need Jesus, unironically

Child porn has to be made, though. Unless it's a drawing or an animation with adult voice actors, the porn shouldn't be there in the first place.

If you mean American conservatives, they're basically just nu-males lite. If you mean reactionaries, they're not fine with child "porn," but they're definitely OK with what most modern liberals would describe as "pedophilia."

Is a naked picture of a child, divest of any explicitly sexual content, "porn"?

>mfw canadians go to jail for lolibutt

>'it's a "real conservatives want to marry 13 year olds" episode

fuck off falseflagging leftist cuck

You think Mohammed wasn't a "conservative"? Or are you saying American conservatives aren't just less progressive liberals?

I am saying that real conservatives don't lust after children. That's what Jews and homosexuals do

Are 16 year olds "children"?

>factually true statement around subject with moral taboo
>everyone loses their minds

Depends on where you live

I assume this was a journalist cutting up parts of a reasonable quote to make it sound like he thinks that CP should be allowed

So legality is morality? You would be fine with me breaking into your house and killing you, provided I wear a uniform and plant a gun on you after the fact to get away with it?

I think people lost their minds because he seemed to think that there was nothing wrong with old disgusting WHITE (shocking!) men who searched for kiddie porn online.

Fun fact: if you watch porn with people of strict legal age in Louisiana, in New York, and someone finds out about it, you will be going to prison, and getting fucked in the ass. Many people who are hit with "child porn" charges have no idea any of the actors are underage

Yeah.

Do you think a 12 year old is a grown up just because has big old tits?

I don't give a shit. I'm talking about the faggot in the OP. His friend actively sought out porn with minors

Is porn created by a child considered child porn? I wrote some erotica as a young lad and I still jerk it to it today

>Yeah.

I'll let my detective friends know they've got a free patsy in you, then.

Yes, it does. We've got some really amazingly stupid court cases where underage kids are old enough to be prosecuted for production, but young enough that they can't be in porn, so they've gotten arrested for sexting

Yeah, I read on and it's a bit more questionable.

Owned

The other one is teenagers mooning people as a prank then becoming convincted sex offenders

this is why baby-boomers are the filth of the earth. For their demagoguery and disregard for the rights of men and women.
>isn't there someone you're forgetting to ask?
Vietnam was teh best day of my life. Im glad they all die of dementia, aids, and cancer.

I mean, soon it'll get to the point where being a racist, sexist, neo-Nazi sex offender will be a requirement for being interesting

Also mass shooter

If you havent been held responsible in the media for a mass shooting, dont talk to me

I doubt you have any friends

>all this rationalizing and apologizing for pedos
Aren't you the people that are always going on about satanic child molesters?

t. smug libshit baby boomer

Pedophilia is the ultimate red pill.

It's funny how somberly the average civilian treats the law, and how irreverently derisive the average police officer is of it. We laugh at people like you

>the party of reason and morality
it was an easy question lads

>So legality is morality?
hmm...

>asnwer my loaded question
>that starts off with smearing and straw-manning
you're a joke. Baby-boomers deserve their lot of being murdered by their own children. By their own governments in Vietnam. By their beloved immigrants who CONTRA'd them. Like they are now. With a thousand paper cuts, and cutting their social security because the economy can keep them alive.

To the law it is.

to baby-boomers*

no it isn't

Oh? Post a picture of a child in a nudist setting, then. I'll wait.

Or you could educate yourself and look up what the law actually is

>nudist setting
perv

The law doesn't matter when you're under suspicion. If you have a bunch of photos like that you are fucked.

not if you're married. Or live on Earth

>the law doesn't matter in a court of law

whatever you say lad. just telling you what's actually on the books because i thought it was relevant to this thread

Post yur collection. I'm sure there will be no consequences.

exhentai.org

Cartoons aren't illegal unless you're in Canada.

they're not illegal anywhere. same with CP

>same with CP

read about designations

Not true, and what?

king melinda's chariot

There are levels of punishment regarding your participation in the illegal activity involving minors

Their legality is on a state-by-state basis in the USA. There's that Shad guy, the black weeb who was jailed for loli hentai, for example, in the state of Iowa.

Good point.

Devil's advocate:
If you allow people to watch child porn, then there will be an incentive for the creators to create more, and the whole market will be expanded (more child abuse to create the videos),
Did John Grishman think of that?

>Not everyone who watches child porn is a child
No shit.
They're not lesbians, they're just attracted to lesbians.

this
should we also put everybody in a gore thread in jail?

this isnt even related to lit, take this to and people who stumble upon child porn or watch it because its forbidden (like, dunno, trespassing) aren't necessarily pedos

Possession should be decriminalized but distribution should be penalized as well as production. This would both make pedophiles less fearful of getting therapy for their issue as well as prevent the creation of child pornography websites on the clearnet. Criminalized production would also be useful for an added crime to child molestation. IIRC there are a few studies that showed correlation between child pornography availability and child molestation rates, with more availability leading to less child molestation. I may be wrong, but you may also be able to extrapolate such a conclusion from the fact that sexual crime in general has decreased with the widespread availability of pornography. Child molestation is a disgusting act, however, pedophilia is a mental illness, we don't criminalize any other sort of mental illness, we don't jail psychopaths until they murder, why should we jail pedophiles that don't molest children?

> market

Well well well.

When you think about it, it's hard to see how information (mere combination of bits) can be illegal, and it's easy to guess it was outlawed as a *mean* to make fighting real crime that produces it possible. However, the incentives to make it the *end* in itself have always been strong as it goes hand in hand with pushing a lot of agendas, and gives an excuse for controlling the Internet, that for some time was truly borderless phenomenon widespread in general public. Given that presumption, you start finding explanations that prove it must be true.

Let's have a closer look at the "child porn market". Except for individuals and groups who make various content with underage participants to sell it ("Child pornographers" are good for media ratings but are rare species on the globe, many of them, and many of the people who paid money to them, are in jail. "Erotic" modelling is still going on in some areas, and remember there's also the content that isn't erotic by itself, but still makes pedos happy.), there are:
- individuals and groups who shared the content freely;
- individuals and groups who never expected their private records would leak;
- kids whose photos and videos (...and texts? Why no one seem to be interested in that? Uncultured swine.) were solicited by someone;
- kids who were blackmailed to make them;
- kids who made them completely at their own will (Someone pulls down the pants for likes, or other social network currency? Duh, blame the society.).
Most of the exchange has always happened freely, just like it has been with pirated movies and software, and you can be damn sure anyone who wants to "trade stuff" is an undercover agent today. To conclude, I doubt any viewer who hasn't paid the producers directly has any way to increase their revenue, as there is no Disney corp. to manage and enforce the copyrights.

In case by "market" you've meant "everyone with potential to watch child porn", well, good old years of p2p filesharing taught me that your average family guy faps to anything that resembles a naked woman without any regard to legality. Preteens in general only arouse true pedos, but hardcore porn with them (of which limited number of media exists) is consumed buy general public the same way other extreme porn is. So, the market is a bit bigger that you expect it to be, the same way real life child molesters are mostly not sick strangers you'd imagine, but average fiends and relatives.

By the way, isn't it strange that you can freely share gore media with kids, but not gore media with naked kids?

How is that a false analogy? Do you think all pedos engage in sex with minors?

Gore is fundamentally different because the production of gore isn't created for the consumption of gore, gorey things happen and then fucked up retards on /gif/ and /b/ watch it.

The consumption of cp perpetuates the creation of it. Less people watching cp means less people molesting children. I think ISIS is the only people who put real production value into their gore. Watching gore doesn't make you a murderer. Watching cp makes you a pedo.

> Watching cp makes you a pedo.
LEL.

If anything, it taught me to be very skeptical about whether little girl who is visibly forced to suck a man's dick can be described as "me and my loli have a true innocent and passionate rabu-rabu 4ever", or whether stunned teenager who is told to smile and spread can be "horny little slut with unlimited sexual drive who can't help flirting with every man around her".

But, of course, Humbert Humbert has been portrayed decades ago.

Let me make it easier to understand.

Pedophiles (referring mainly to preteens lovers or "real pedophiles" as you call them) search and buy child porn online.
Da russians who created it, get more money and demand, they kidnap more little children and rape them on camera.

Understand now?

All the good counter culture are all taking away!!! SOMEONE DO SOMETHING

Nazi for music...
Homophobic for fashion.
Racism for Art films...
Sexism for Video games

So CP is the, clearly, next step for Literature. Any other suggestions?

Would you left you are child with someone who YOU KNOW is pedo?

The biggest distributor of child porn is the FBI.