All art is propaganda

All your base are belong to us
All of us are belong to your base

>X is not Y

Nothing politically motivated is good, because political narratives are oppressive rather than expressive.

...

true - but not doctrinally so.

holy fuckaroo, dude

If all X & Y are Z then there are no X or Y

What?

>all X are B haha uhh

If he says this then I should start watching some of his stuff.

ALL X ARE Y
NO B ARE X

IF B THEN NOT X!

uhhh brainy hurtie now haha

Sorry! I didn't mean to hurt you! I'm just being logical!

1. P ↔ Q
2. (S v T) → Q
3. ¬P v (¬T & R)
4. (P → Q) & (Q → P)
5. Q → P
6. (S v T) → P
7. P → (¬T & R)
8. (S v T) → (¬T & R)
9. ¬(S v T) v (¬T & R)
10. (¬S & ¬T) v (¬T & R)
11. [(¬S & ¬T) v ¬T] & [(¬S & ¬T) v R]
12. (¬S & ¬T) v ¬T
13. ¬T v (¬S & ¬T)
14. (¬T v ¬S) & (¬T v ¬T)
15. ¬T v ¬T
16. ¬T
17. ¬T v U
18. T → U

Oh wow we got a real thinky boi in here, lads! Check this fella out!

All art is rhetoric, you mean

He says Frozen is propaganda used to push feminism and that if art discusses social or political issues (I.E. all art) then it is propaganda.

it okay

1. Jordan Peterson is a dumbass.
2. All dumbasses are Jordan Peterson
3. All dumbasses and Jordan Petersons are memes
4. Therefore, no dumbass or Jordan Peterson is not a meme

I agree with him then.

OK!

unto are inferior derivatives of to

How does doctrinally function in this sentence? As in they don't have the specific aim of indoctrinating people or?