Why is Crime and Punishment a great book?

Why is Crime and Punishment a great book?

Why is that dumbass holding the axe the wrong way?

Have you not read the book or are you baiting?

Great plot, great characters, great philosophical discussions, comfy setting, great dialogues, memorable parts.

Bad things: Rushed ending, 'OK' prose and style

It's more eficient to bash her head than to break it open into an explosion of brains and blood.

I'm basically Raskolnikov, without the murders of course.

gaystoevsky was a yid with no talent

Veeky Forums loves books that intermingle some lite-philosophy, or in the case with something like Musil, light-philosophy, with narrative, which I can't say I disagree in the admiration

Its a metaphor. The act of killing the old lady will be his doom and perdition.

holy crap

>without the murders of course.
haha, of course...

>wtf i love god now

great ending to a great novel. really dosto?

He doesn't use an axe though.

>Crime and Punishment
>Good

>comfy setting,
If being fucking poor and seeing drunk little girls walking down the street is comfy to you sure.

>comfy setting
lol, what the fuck

Dunia and Sonya are cute

It's too bad they never film that scene with Svidrigailov and his vision of the little seducer in any of the adaptations. It's pretty important actually

It was a little too dark for the masses.
Though, it is crucial to watching rodya break under societies weight.

Oh la dee fuckin' dah.

Who let the squares in?

I don't think you read the book.

I'm basically Raskolnikov, without the murders of course.