So I was reading Debord's Commentary on the Society of Spectacle and Agamben's Homo Sacer and a lot of it sounds very...

So I was reading Debord's Commentary on the Society of Spectacle and Agamben's Homo Sacer and a lot of it sounds very similar to right-wing conspiracy material. Not to mention people like Zizek and Sloterdijk say crypto-/pol/ stuff all the time. It seems like the far right represents the logical conclusion, the completion and fulfillment of the radical critique of postmodernism, post-structuralism, queer theory and what not. The radical critique that refuses to be recuperated. Eventually pluralism and relativism become a new form of universalism, and the only meaningful way to assert oneself is to negate relativism and postmodernity for a new absolutism. The Harvard sociologist Pitirim Sorokin noticed this in his analysis of how cultural patterns go from materialistic to idealistic. The historian Oswald Spengler also touched upon similar themes of cyclicity and civilizational phases. This is why the 21st century is witnessing a great religious revival. Fascists, Jihadis and neocatholic reactionaries, are the true children of postmodernity.

Revolutionary conservatism is a radical affirmation of Dasein.
The postmodern liberal order was a content free moral solution for a world in which everything had been discredited. But what happens when liberalism and postmodernism themselves are discredited? When contentless freedom becomes prescriptive? When relativism develops into an universalising ideology? You know Gramsci's original notion of Marxist hegemony actually implied a strengthening of the proletarian family unit, not its dissolution and replacement by atomized units. The simple affirmation of organic Dasein is revolutionary.

pseud general

Pseud pleb teen soyboy bugman

Debord:
>people communicate with media
>the way people communicate shapes the way they think
>media shapes the way people think

/pol/:
>the jews are organizing a worldwide conspiracy to keep the white man down
>the jews own the media
>the media is part of a worldwide conspiracy to keep the white man down

Debord:
>we need to distance ourselves somewhat from media, and go on lots of nice walks around the city

/pol/:
>we need to do ethnic cleansing

These are obviously very different trains of thought.

i arrived at similar conclusions, albeit reducing postmodernism to post-structuralist relativism is wrong. there are many different schools of thought labelled as "postmodernism"

ive also noticed zizek and sloterjik flirting with /pol/-tier thought and it disappoints me. ethnocentrism is no solution, to anything

>tfw this image is a more or less accurate representation of your political beliefs

Foucault supported the Iran revolution for no other reason than it was anti-western. Imagine being so hypocritical: a literal product of western liberalism preaching its downfall. He probably pozzed up some Algerian teens.

wrong. this shows you lack an understanding of what you speak

/pol/ is a recognition of jews having a common goal: furthering themselves, their race, and their religion, by helping other jews over other races. it's not a conspiracy of any kind. it comes down to memetic sociology. their inherent xenophobia makes them a dangerous force. they are, in fact, not united, and this is why they are dangerous

learn yourself before you embarrass yourself

>tfw the schizophrenic shitposts u vomited a year ago in Veeky Forums are still going around causing new and exciting forms of Mental Illness amongst the undergrads

Foucault and Burroughs represent the last Heroic phase of homosexuality, just before it got recuperated by the liberal establishment.