>they genuinely believed replacing fruit and whole grains with processed meat and fat was "healthy"
Decided I'd try eat a healthier breakfast and try museli
So did you just realize you misread the label and are pretending this exchange didn't happen or what?
>21g of sugar
>seems like a fuck tonne.
that's half the sugar of a can of coke
but still a bit moe than a recommended portion size.
if you're concerned sugar intake then try a muesli without dried fruit and add fresh fruit. then you have more control over what you're putting into your body.
6g of sugar.
You could make your own mix - rolled oats, and whatever amount of whatever dried fruits and nuts you like.
Its not the same as added processed sugar m8. Sugar from fruit is fine you just dont want to eat much more than 25 grams a day.
>6g of sugar
put that into context please. is that a serving size, a square, per 100 grams, %????
what's the name of the bar?
You don't think people will stop eating so much junk food garbage? I don't see why future people wouldn't laugh at our lab created sugars and fats. We already laugh at some of the over-processed food products from only 50 years back. I also think they're gonna laugh at our overfed malnourished poor people vs underfed malnourished poor people global dichotomy, this being gilded age 2: techno boogaloo.
But who fucking knows? We'd like to think science and wisdom will always march forward, continually refining the human experience, but this may not be so.
The nutrition table, fag.
Or just the name, I'll look it up myself.
They'll laugh at our absurd diets where we think fats and carbs are bad