*makes all following philosophy obsolete*

*makes all following philosophy obsolete*

Other urls found in this thread:

clyp.it/mbjukpye
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

N-No all my precious work!

>yfw people don't know that Locke was the first to come up with the phenomenal/noumenal distinction

HA
NOT SO FAST FAGGOT

But Locke was before Kant.

excuse me fucker

Plato came out with the phenomenal/noumenal distinction

>all philosophy so far was useless
>only a God can save us
>lets just do poetry for the rest of time

gr8 conclusions

Everything you said there is true and played out though

Whenever I see Heidegger posted I can't help but imagine how tight Hannah Arendt's pussy was

The funny thing is that even if you disagree with everything Kant said, he's still one of the most important philosophers ever. And easily one of the smartest

...

test

Better than
>don't do to other people what you wouldn't like them to do to you, there, philosophy solved guize xd

she really was a qt

Its not a question of how tight Arendts pussy was or how thick Heideggers dick was, its a question of the imminent tension between them

*calls you a faggot*

It played out very well. Secular countries are far more morally just than religious ones today.

kek BTFO

>morally just
aka gay

>justifies fascism
>contributes nothing to civilization

>civilization
Stop watching porn.

>Heidegger Unconceals his monster cock
>Hannah starts to Care for the shaft, swerving her tongue like the path of a snake up his hot, thick Dasein
>Heidegger slams her back into the sheets in Thrownness
>flips her onto her stomach for The Turn
>Grasps his pulsing cock Ready-to-Hand
>pulls apart her cheeks, sees the Clearing
too lazy to continue

So what you're saying is they fucked incredibly hard, fast, and like animals? Because that's hot

You haven't read Nietzsche, Mussolini, or Hitler

*makes all the humanities look like a fucking joke*

Is he right with his assertion that science made philosophy obsolete?

I believe that the hard problem of consciousness justifies the existence of humanities.

Religious countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan are some of the gayest countries out there.

>Is he right with his assertion that science made philosophy obsolete?

No, he's just a moron that doesn't grasp the fundamental problem of induction.

hehehe

Everyone has a grasp on it, but we don’t have a better method than science.

His entire argument in favor of keeping tradition and religion hinged on the presupposition that the because the self has an identity and percieves the world in a particular way, that there is no way to say anything for certain about the independent objective reality [and you silly scientists should just shut up :^))))]

If he had withheld his scorn for the attacks on religion, he would find that rationalist ideals would justify the reasons for religion's existence from a functional viewpoint.
Cruel irony would turn the tables on Kant's core beliefs a century and a half later, and his ideas would justify their destruction and abandonment.

Well yeah, the entire German Counter Enlightenment followed his idea of Reason and it would grow into some of the core tenets of Postmodern Epistemology.

Yes, because science is the major contributing factor to the downfall of mankind into a techno-dystopian hell controlled by sentient A.I who torture people in test tubes for thousands of years in the stylings of I have No Mouth and I Must Scream.

>Yes, because science is the major contributing factor to the downfall of mankind into a techno-dystopian hell controlled by sentient A.I who torture people in test tubes for thousands of years in the stylings of I have No Mouth and I Must Scream.

Is this why I don't have a girlfriend?

That doesn't render philosophy useless.

Yeah, just look how worse life got because of modern medicine and industrial production.

>he would find that rationalist ideals would justify the reasons for religion's existence from a functional viewpoint.

Yeah, just look how worse Icarus got after getting the wings

Awfully different from Kant though b/c Plato thought you could figure out what the noumena were

>Secular countries are far more morally just than religious ones today
That's a ridiculously crude statement.

he would find that rationalist ideals would justify the reasons for religion's existence from a functional viewpoint.

?

>commence pussy destruktion

>Hooray everyone, we have to live even longer in this alienated ratscape

Medicine is the cruelest science

You’re free to end it at any moment, pal. It’s not like life was more meaningful during the Black Death or any other period of time.

>living a comfy peasant life in the country until God mercifully calls you to heaven at 20 with your 13 year old wife

Sounds great to me

It isn’t. Whether you take corruption or crime rates, highly religious countries are the worst offenders.

You can live in the countryside trying self-sustainance today.

Yeah but I can't marry a 13 year old girl

Not with that attitude.

>that there is no way to say anything for certain about the independent objective reality
Didnt so much mean this as: Scientests do not 100% know what an electron looks like and who knows if it is possible to. All comprehension of 'electron' is capturing of information by relation and proxy of the electrons interactions with material and light

Your in a philosophy thread and completely failing at the dialectical method, shame. A religious person wouldn't think of abortion as morally just and secular countries legalize and practice it on a mass scale, they would also consider it more unjust than corruption or theft.

>dialectic bait
Fuck you rationalist fool

No, Kant was a useless tool who made joke philosophy.
Far from it. Man was a retard.
>morally just
>according to muh secular standards
So this is the power of atheist philosophy...
All methods are bad. That's a better method: nonmethod. Try reading Against Method.

>he doesn't understand that morality is an emergent quality of the unfolding absolute

>figure out what the noumena were
Nope — not so much that you could ever give an account. The most you could ever do as a human was "get a glimpse" of the Forms/Gods, but never understand/know them.

Of course, there's the whole business of anamnesis, but who knows what he meant by that.

shitposters like this are just ruining the board. They aren't even funny in a creative or banter sort of way, they just drag down the whole level of discussion

>waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah why arent you plaaaaaaaaaaaaaying by muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh ruleeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

A bloo bloo boo

What about me?

>today
I am so glad Whig history is alive and well; what of China user or Israel? Or maybe we will look at yesterday, the USSR comes to mind.
Atheist morals can not be natural, what makes secularism just?

tfw schopenhauer took his philosophy to height and took it to height kant wouldnt even be able to dream of because of his intellectual rigidity

don't make posts like these again

>tfw schopenhauer took his philosophy to heights his intellectual rigidity wouldnt have ever allowed it to reach

lows*

explain this post

Sartre's ontology is an abomination.

schopenhauer was retarded

fun fact: hegel didnt hate him back, he just felt really bad for him and went out of his way to convince his colleagues that schopenhauer wasnt really that bad

Heidegger doesn't even provide arguments.

*knock knock*

hegel was a cunt though

Why do you say that?

He though he was god on earth,he was also an authoritarian

So what, I think of myself the same way, whats your problem?

nice bait

Whatever you soycialist faggot

socialist,where does that come from?

if you're god, why are there still niggers around

I wanted any talk back from you I'd ask for it you fucking bitch

To keep you on your feet, git gud fagit

tell that to my fucking face motherfucker acting all tough n shit on an anonymous board fuck outta here nigga see me in ferentari when ill shank you on your way to the store your mom sent you to buy bread fuck you motherfucker

fucking soy-god, afraid of killing em

Just try it lad just try it lad we'll see ya so big man then little faggot fuck

im 6'2 and i armbar at least two men each time i go to bars

Literally give me an address and I'll see you there

>secular countries are more morally righteous according to my secular ethics
>measuring the standard with the standard
Makes you think.

see me around the metro station "eroii revolutiei" in bucharest

Fuckin you're on I'll be coming for you

This.
Anyone who is legitimately well read recognizes Hegel as the essential end all be all. Philosophers after him made interesting contributions, but after hegel it is literally impossible to go further.

yea,interesting contributions,like communism and fascism

wow, two Veeky Forums fights in two days
also pic as related as it ever will be

Do you have a source for that? I know what Schopenhauer though of Hegel but I've never seen anything about Hegel’s opinion on Schopenhauer

hold up I'm gonna look it up

It's from an interview with one of Hegel's biographers

that would be an honirable way to die for me,taking my argument with me beyond death

>defeated lying on the ground, coughing blood, you beckon the victor towards you
>"Not an argument"
>*die*

fucking bolynu

...

It was Pinkard, search warosu it was posted a couplw days ago

clyp.it/mbjukpye

He isn't wrong but take everything Pinkard says with a pinch of salt, he HEAVILY sugar coats Hegel.

>teleports behind you
>"heh nothing personell"