I’m going to puke

That's how propaganda works user

>user asks me to name one woman who's changed the world
>I name a woman who's changrd the world
HEY MAN THATS CHERRY PICKIN!!!!!!!!

I didn’t ask you shit. And my point was directed and the stupid bitches buying this trash, not you.

Feminism is not nearly as deplorable as Islam senpai

You know this equality shit has gone too far when people are trying to provide young girls with positive role models.

Upvoted, my good sir.

Lizzy
Vikky
Kathy

You fucking retarded or something? Lizzy was the single biggest player for the British empire you imbecile

Unironically this.

They’re both trash ideologies

T. Trad-Cath with NatSoc fiancée

Fuck you, you disgusting soyboy numale cuck SJW commie faggot. Bet you just love watching Rick and Morty, don't you? Bet you have BLACKED.com bookmarked, haven't you? You vile cretin, you subverter of white values and masculinity.
Little girls should learn the value of being a chaste stay-at-home wife who provides for her WHITE children and husband's needs.

> Being this fucking butthurt because some women are superior to you.

Plot twist: Feminist Baby’s placeholder gender is male.

I really hope this is bait, otherwise please pull a Hitler & Braun and off yourself

this tho

So many butthurt Roberts in this thread

Just how fat/ugly is your roasty?

Mad that I get to beat up my fianceé and she fucking loves it because it's traditional and healthy?

my mom c:

>Thinks he's trad-Cath
>Nazi gf
Yeah, you're going to hell.

That's very sweet, user. You made me smile.

No, that is actually fucking hysterical holy fuck

Two mentally stunted subhumans together. Pure pottery

oh god, please let this become a meme.

Why is Veeky Forums the only board that can troll /pol/?

ROBERT LITERALLY DID NOTHING WRONG
ALL HIS NEGATIVE QUALITIES COME FROM YOUR PROJECTIONS AS THE READER. THE AUTHOR LITERALLY STATES IN AN INTERVIEW SHE MADE HIM BAREBONES AS POSSIBLE SO THE READER AND MARGOT COULD PROJECT WHATEVER THEY WANTED ON TO ROBERT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>making a child believe in angels and mithological stuff is the same as making him/her believe women can also pursue STEM careers or play important roles in society.

ok

>Roberts
stop

yeah but all we needed was

>makes rude, condescending comments
>candy wrappers
>is old but can't kiss
>all he knows about sex is from porn
>slut-shames when he gets rejected

and we know who he is

>allow you to cut your baby's dick
>doesnt allow you to teach him about feminist
hmmm i wonder ((((who)))) is behind those threads ;v)

What is this a reference to?

That is such a Robert thing to post

Who are you quoting?

the trick is to use c: instead of :)

original OP.

Cat person yo

I'm not a feminist but you're not considering the argument that this is due to social oppression of them and women not having the same opportunities for higher education throughout civilized history. Just playing devil's advocate because my opposition to people not being reasonable is greater than any opposition to feminism I might have.

By acknowledging this aren’t you kind of being a feminist? Unless you think it’s good that women have been denied education and opportunity.

but user, that thing you just said (the notion of a perpetuated patriarchal structure as the cause of today's inequality in terms of gender representation) is the basis of feminism in its reasonable form. You might be a feminist

If the vast majority of women had the power to change the world, then they wouldn't be oppressed, and wouldn't need the permission of men to do any of those things.
Women are only able to do all these things because men allow them. Not to say that capable women don't exist

...

>queefing
ah yes this is a very reputable sounding article

It’s based on video that you can look up for yourself. Dumb roastie.

The footage is available for you to see

I'm not sure how that makes Dr_Caveman a reputable source of opinion.

It probably doesn't

>opinion
>reputable
he's interpreting a reality tv series with a huge bias, treat it how it is, it's neither more or less

Wasn't it more that it was necessary for women to produce children so that society's population would increase, thus improving survivability? Having more population resulted in a stronger community, and this required women to give birth and raise more than two children (to replace the dying parents). With high rates of child mortality, women needed to produce 4-8 children for populations to grow, starting from a young age. This didn't really give them time to be world changers, and if they neglected their duty to raise children people perceived them as unvirtuous.

It's only with modern medicine and low child mortality that society can now afford for women to perform any role. Population is also not the key factor for power anymore, it has largely been replaced by economic output. Gender equality is a luxury provided by science, but with basically doubling the workforce there isn't much of a reason for a first world country to not do it.

Did you think such a retarded blatant strawman argument was clever? Please show me where OP supported circumcision.

This may sound weird but I believe this is true while at the same time don't regret a single advance that feminism has made.

...

Sure, I was just speaking historically, and my post shouldn't really have been a response to yours, since I don't necessarily disagree
>It's only with modern medicine and low child mortality that society can now afford for women to perform any role
The problem is whether or not they're as well suited as men. If they perform worse, then you should put them in the place where their natural talents are allowed to flourish. Such as in child and elder care.
>there isn't much of a reason for a first world country to not do it.
Mothers.
People really underestimate the quality of a good, stay at home mother. It's such a essential and beautiful role in making families work, and women are somehow shamed for it, or deterred from the position entirely

>The problem is whether or not they're as well suited as men.

This is true, but even if they only functioned at 80% or some such, it is still labor adding to the community.

>Mothers.

I agree on you with this, but with now very low mortality rates, if two couples produce 3 children each, this means that a man and a women somewhere are no longer required to add to the population. In China's case, they even introduced a law to try and reduce population growth. The remaining 'free of reproduction duty' women are more valuable contributing to the community via labor instead of reproduction, excess of which in China's case is even perceived as harmful. Mothers are important, but we now need less mothers to raise the same number of children than in the past.

women of the world
take over
cause if you don't
the world
will come
to an end

>The remaining 'free of reproduction duty' women are more valuable contributing to the community via labor instead of reproduction,
The problem is that, generally speaking, women desire children. Most women will want a child by at least age 30. Women without children are more depressed, I seem to recall reading.

I seem to recall that workplaces where women and men are intermingled are less productive, and that workplaces only filled with woman have a whole lot more tension and strife. Don't take my word for it, though

>Women without children are more depressed
I'm not familiar with this, though I can see how having a solid time limit would change things.

>I seem to recall that workplaces where women and men are intermingled are less productive, and that workplaces only filled with woman have a whole lot more tension and strife.

My understanding is similar, though I seem to note a high ratio of men to women works best. Male values dictate that men can't show weakness / frustration to other men, but with a female around they can express it, and then acting as social lubricant they can improve things. Kind of hard to describe, but male-only work places tend to be a little bit too competitive and defensive, and a small portion of females eases that. That's mostly just from personal experience though.

I suppose that would depend on the workplace, but might be possible.
I know that combat units perform worse if they have a female in their ranks. I know from personal experience that women distract me, but they are also fun to play my energy off on.

I think our social and cultural evolution is simply ahead our biological one. So that even though society allows for women to work, their biology makes them less than ideal. Same for men, I suppose, with regards to child care

Not the guy you two were responding to, but neither of you have reading comprehension nor critical reading skills. Acknowledging something doesn't mean you are against it for it. The guy only acknowledged women don't have the same opportunities as men historically because of societal restrictions. He never said he was against this. He merely acknowledged it.

Wew lad

Lol at the goatfucker and the nigger woman highfiving each other (standing stronk against evil white supremacy!), when Arabs had been enslaving and killing and genociding blacks for centuries before the whites had the idea

do you really believe this? it's obvious that women aren't just as attrackted as men to some fields. for example Jazz or Composing - there are hardly any women. as interpreters of classical music on the other hand there are plenty. does this mean that this is the area where they don't suffer oppression? I think this is a very cheap explanation.
the same for natural science. boys are interested in the stuff from an early age so it's only natural that they do the jobs later. if women really wanted they could do it without problems.

> 9/10
more like 99/100 user

more like 999/1000 desu

he he ; )

pls kys

women are not funny

>candy wrappers
this fuckin detail man.. REE STOP MOCKING ME BITCH

t. poopy rupi

>teaches babies to throw things, make a fuss about food, and generally be a little shit
>positive role models
Unless "feminism" is literally just contrarianism for girls then there's not much of a role model to be found in there.

I'm glad mom and dad took care of me, absent parents are the greatest danger to our current society. ¢:

Grace Hopper

Bam sure let himself go

Every book written in English with a hijab on the cover needs to be burned.

Same for trannies. Enough of this degenerate shit.

I'm only reading straight Anglo writers writing about straight Anglo characters from now on because of this bullshit.

Plenty of classics for me to re-read anyway.

fiancée is feminine form. poster is a roasty.

>The remaining 'free of reproduction duty' women are more valuable contributing to the community via labor instead of reproductio

Except that is ultimately dysgenic.

You get the smart women NOT having kids, meaning genes for intelligence are not passed on. Nor are they instilling the values associated with intelligence. No way would I let my kids be raised by some Mexican nanny who can barely speak English and has a grade 8 education.

If only the stupid women are raising kids, passing on low IQ-genes and not teaching them to read or think, then each generation will just get stupider.

Once again, protestants show they're autists with little to no regard for the real world

Wait a minute: is the Literature board on Veeky Forums.com judging a book by its cover?