Guys, can I PLEASE have a philosphy Youtuber that is
a) not a retarded pseud
b) not a shill
PLEASE
Guys, can I PLEASE have a philosphy Youtuber that is
Owen Sanders
Other urls found in this thread:
Brayden Lee
Tough one... only retards do anything substantial for free
Lincoln Mitchell
Nigga's gotta eat.
Brandon Powell
Why the fuck have you started trying to force the meme of a fat, ugly high school teacher?
John Stewart
>this nigga
Embarrassing
Bentley Gonzalez
If you disparage Gregory B. Sadler you are truly an asshole. This guy spends hundreds of hours every month making youtube videos for free on the most important philosophers and you dislike him because he wants to be compensated in some way. Sadler is not a shill, you fucking ingrate faggots.
Leo Jones
>for free
> he wants to be compensated
Adrian Bailey
>"Half Hour Hegel"
>Over 200 videos of that format
>Not A SINGLE of those is half an hour long
Kayden Jones
Just because one does something for free does not mean that he shouldn't desire compensation for his efforts. He shouldn't expect it, but certainly there's nothing about doing things out of charity that precludes the person from wishing for compensation
Ryan Davis
Because its not a God damn charity then. You can turn on a TV and watch any show for free it doesn't mean NBC is a fucking charity
Brandon Bell
Faggot
>Check the wiki,the catalog, andthe archivebefore asking for advice or recommendations, and please refrain from starting new threads for questions that can be answered by a search engine.
Alexander Perry
...
Nathaniel Adams
>put out hundreds of hours of free content
>"hey, maybe check out my tutoring program if you want"
>"wow what fucking Jew shill shekel-hoarder"
millennials were a mistake
Matthew Hill
Who are you quoting?
Jacob Kelly
Here you go lad.
Joseph Lee
If you're even considering looking up fucking youtubers you are already both retarded and a pseud.
Read a fucking book.
Angel Hill
OP you newfag
Jack Flores
Daily reminder that Gregory Sadler rated his own book a four out of five.
Tyler Ramirez
I think that's the best rating he could've given himself. 5/5 would be too self-confident and 3/5 would make it mediocre. Anything below would make it bad, so 4/5 is the only rating one could give himself to say "Yes, it's good and worth a read, but there is room to improve since it's not the best thing out there".
wtf I love Gregory now
Adrian Wright
>expects to be paid for his time
I remember last year we were having this same arguement with Cliff. And most seemed to be under the impression that when the man works hard to put out content, he should be paid. Proof of this: Le capitalism. Why is it any different with a Ph. D?
Jackson Price
If you don't think your book is worth reading why would you expect anyone else to think it is?
James Powell
'The Rugged Pyrrhus'
Grayson Barnes
Russell's History of Western Philosophy audiobook playlist
And re ad along with the free pdf, google 'history of western philosophy pdf'
This is the ONLY acceptable answer.