What are the most important non-fiction books of the last 30 years (especially in philosophy)?

Land and Negarestani’s books. No one else matters, maybe Zizek a little, Pickety’s stupid meme book, books on Beh Genomics

>philosophy
>important

...

>land
>important

op asked for which books are important....not what meemees you happen to buy into

...

Without fear of irony, this.

>highly influential in western, governmental policy

Already lost its significance. Turns out a lot of research is not correct.
No one should deny how influential this was. But the selfish gene perhaps more.

I think that we'll need more years in order to tell which was the most imporant. Only time will tell.

>But the selfish gene

I know but its over 30 years old

books don't need to be accurate to be important or influential e.g. marx

Why is it that current, millennial, political radicals (left or right) don't seem to have books which articulate their movement. for example, in the late 90's, those of an anti-corporation, anti-globalization left wing disposition would rally around or Klein's dismal "no logo".

Has the codex already become usurped and replaced by soundbite orientated internet shenanigans?

I don't necessarily agree with it, but it shaped a lot of people's conception of international relations.

>books don't need to be accurate to be important or influential e.g. marx
Sure, same with Freud.
I guess Kahneman's book will certainly be a classic mentioned in many psychology textbooks to come.

Is that true? About Thinking Fast and Slow? Source? I haven’t heard that.

don't think too much.

I would be say particularly influential. Like who in the public knew Peterson before a year ago?

Was there a lot of original work presented in Thinking? I was under the impression that it was a sort of Summa of cognitive science research.

There was an journalistic article some time ago. You should be able to find it. Kahneman admitted it himself.
I think the concept of cognitive biases stands on firm ground, or at least the idea that humans are fully rational is no longer considered correct. So we have him to thank for that shift in thinking.

If you liked Kahneman you could check out "The Enigma of Reason" and books by Gerd Gigerenzer.

I doubt he will be remembered by his book. If anything he will revitalize Jung and the Bible instead.

Surprised nobody has said this. Regardless of what you think, a lot of people read it.

what is this supposed to imply? the industry which this occurred in was Jewish dominated. If there was a sexual assault crisis in defense or politics it would disproportionately effect whytes. Most rapists and pedophiles are statistically whyte in america. Your leader is a predator, well known one who happens to have child prostitutes running around the vicinity of his hotels and casinos

I’m just bummed cuz I went out and bought it literally last week ......

Also, this book is really great.

Probably the greatest history of the Nazis for the lay public that will ever exist.

Book by a group of French anarchists. Glenn beck helped to popularize this one.

Seems like a book which pairs well with Thinking

>by Richard Evans

you can believe whatever you want, your body is being parceled out and sold to the highest bidder as we speak. your consciousness is being extinguished by social media and the internet every day. you’ve contracted a sickness that won’t diminish in strength in any appreciable way in the near future. i don’t think rejecting Land is a gud proposition.

I don’t really agree with Pinker on his view of the mind but this book made a splash.

A more recent one.

The Enigma of Reason
Four Princes
On Tyranny
The Great Leveler
Genocide in the Ottoman Empire
The Invention of Science
World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History
The Meaning of Human Existence
Alan Ryan On Politics
1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed
Revolutionary Ideas
Inventing the Individual
After Hegel: German Philosophy, 1840-1900
Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing
The Hall of Uselessness: Collected Essays
The German Genius
A History of France from the Earliest Times to the Treaty of Versailles
The Horse, the Wheel, and Language
Lost to the West
The Inheritance of Rome
Seeing Islam as Others Saw It
The Great Tradition
Mind in Life
The Pursuit of Glory: Europe 1648-1815
After Tamerlane: The Global History of Empire Since 1405
Rites of Peace: The Fall of Napoleon and the Congress of Vienna
The Man Who Forgot How To Read
Iron Kingdom
The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, And the Radical Remaking of Economics
Ideas: A History of Thought and Invention, from Fire to Freud
How Rich Countries Got Rich And Why Poor Countries Stay Poor
Constant Battles
The Nuremberg Interviews
All of the "Cambridge history books series"
Rubicon
In the Name of Rome: The Men Who Won the Roman Empire
The Mystique of Enlightenment: The Radical Ideas of U.G. Krishnamurti
German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781-1801
A Jacques Barzun Reader
Carnage and Culture
In Ruins
The Palace of Darius at Susa
The Righteous Mind
Vanished Kingdoms
Pluralism
30-Second Philosophies (actually bretty fun)
A New History of Western Philosophy
Today I Wrote Nothing
Science Of Memory: Concepts
Broadsides: The Age of Fighting Sail, 1775-1815
Orderly and Humane
The Book of Prefaces
John Rawls stuff
Autopsy for an Empire
The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability
The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change
The Black Book of Communism
Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective
The Rape of Nanking
Europe - Davies, Norman
A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution: 1891-1924
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
On Pain
Landscape And Memory
Keeping Together in Time
Death by Government
Kissinger Diplomacy
Ordinary Men
Paved with Good Intentions
The Myth of Primitivism
Quasi Rational Economics
The Passion of the Western Mind

too many books
desu
just read
>From Dawn to Decadence

...

...

...

Why do you value Land so highly?

This and Consciousness Explained

Unironically this

Honestly, yeah. I have met a lot of people who have read this irl

So any of this legitimately good

I had to engage with it a lot during my high school history classes. It was pretty big at the time.

too bad it's absolute shit

more books!
Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without the State
The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity
In Search of the Indo-Europeans
Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity
The Collapse of Complex Societies
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?
Red Famine: Stalin's War on Ukraine, 1921-1933
A Crack in Creation
Is There Anything Good about Men?
A Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design
War! What Is It Good For?: Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots
Instant Expert: The Human Brain, Intelligence and Memory
Letters of Note: An Eclectic Collection of Correspondence Deserving of a Wider Audience
The Lost Art of Finding Our Way
The Biocentric Worldview
Europe Before Rome: A Site-By-Site Tour of the Stone, Bronze, and Iron Ages
The Spark of Life: Electricity in the Human Body
Totalitarianism and Political Religion: An Intellectual History
The Problem of Political Authority
The Faith of the Faithless: Experiments in Political Theology
Gulag Voices
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
The Soul Hypothesis
Towards Speculative Realism
Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice
Little Did I Know
A Wicked Company
Carthage Must Be Destroyed
The Vertigo Years
A Study on Authority
Predictably Irrational
An Elemental Thing
Revolutionary Characters: What Made the Founders Different
After Finitude
The Rape of the Masters
Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes Us Human
Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective
The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain
The Dream of Reason
The Mastery and Uses of Fire in Antiquity
The Cunning Of Unreason
The Quest for Cosmic Justice
Selected Non-Fictions Borges, Jorge Luis
No Other Book: Selected Essays
Diogenes of Sinope: The Man in the Tub
Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History
Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk
Into the Gray Zone: A Neuroscientist Explores the Border Between Life and Death
The Neuroscience of Intelligence
After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain
Behavioral Genetics
Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension

most of these are
I should know; cause I've read most of them.
Sure, you can skip the history books, I just added them cause I like them.

Can't believe this wasn't posted.

What? Guess that you forgot the pic.

You're right.

I can't tell if you're memeing. Libertarian paternalism and choice architecture more generally are super important but this book is 90% pop-psychology garbage

This.

Consider that Jews are like 1-2% of the US population.

>Most rapists and pedophiles are statistically whyte in america
I doubt that, but even so what you have to look at is per capita. Also, plenty of Jews in politics and they rape and assault lots too. Take Al Franken as a very recent example.

>i doubt that
you’re retarded
>per capita
this doesn’t work in tiny populations like jews and romani idiot
>look at al franken
yeah look at dennis hastert, sergio berlusconi and roy moore you fucking nigger

consider that this is hollywood and jews dominate that industry and these are mostly adult women complaining about being groped or coerced into having sex. not men sexually assaulting women like in a movie you alarmist nigger

>Roy Moore.
One of his accusers just today announced it was a case of mistaken identity and Gloria Alred's yearbook was a half a forgery.

lol.

>you’re retarded
>this doesn’t work in tiny populations like jews and romani idiot
>yeah look at dennis hastert, sergio berlusconi and roy moore you fucking nigger

ok he still was fucking under aged women
lol do you have any stats from the FBI or any other LEO’s or NGO’s or crime watch groups that demonstrate that the global jewish population commits more sexual assault PER CAPITA (fucking idiot) than whytes do? You’re posturing right now without offering anything tangible besides hollywood execs and directors who happen to inhabit a jewish dominated field. There is no such scandalous crisis among Jewish tech employees, or jewish office workers, or jewish bankers or jewish lawyers, or jewish teachers. You’re focusing on the top .01% of the jewish population, your sample size is smaller than 150 people. I don’t see how that’s convincing and 1/3 of the people on that chart are whyte.

There were two cases of allegations that came from actual under aged people and none of them got to "fucking" part.

That said he was terrible candidate compared to Strange, brooks or Sessions.

>makes statements that isn't backed up by stats
>doesn't account for population size
>lol GIV EVIDENCE M8!!!!!
Sure is a lot of coincidences. And any anti-jewish stats are anti-semitic and thus unlikely to exist.

ok you’re backtracking from the original claim. you said per capita jews commit disproportionate (and i assume you’re driving at, more than whytes) sexual assault. israel’s sexual assault rate per capita is not at all comparable to countries like mexico, south africa, belgium, america etc. I don’t understand where you were going with that. the men in your infographic are all famous rich men, so top .01% of the world population. They mostly come from hollywood, a jewish dominated industry. But, again there is no sexual assault crisis among jewish office workers or bank employees or lawyers or teachers or jewish doctors. Im pointing out that Dennis Hastert is just an example of a rich whyte man who molested younger men, there are probably a hundred other examples from business in the last 10 years. No one would say whytes are a rapist race, but you’re trying to imply this about jews. What data do you have that suggests American jews or Jews as a race are more prone to sexual assault than whytes or blacks or asians? If you don’t have any evidence and you just have incidents, i can’t accept what you are saying as true. You’re manipulating small data sets to give off a false impression. Im asking nicely, where are your stats, can i please see them, and are they from a reputable source which i can check on? If you have them, im happy to look. Citing things like priests raping kids or rabbis molesting kids or imams touching kids isn’t convincing evidence that a group is any way. You have to actually analyze the whole population. people in positions of power do evil things constantly. you’re trying to make an argument that is based on a differet premise using data that is too small, incomplete and again isn’t saying what you want it to say. Harvey weinstein had consensual sex with a lot of those women, so did a lot of the jewish and whyte men accused of sexual assault. they’re dog piling onto these people because there is a legal and financial incentive to do so. You’re playing dumb because jews are involved. Brian Singer is an actual example of a jew who seems to seriously be a predator, al franken probably is too, tho he seems like he’s more of a pathetic creep like louis ck than anything. kevin spacey and singer seem to actually be predators. you’re not making any distinction between them because it suits your agenda to not do so. im asking politely and clearly for data from reputable sources to build upon your point. otherwise you are doing what is called posturing, and this only works with people who already agree with your assumptions. i do not, and in my experience the only jews who are really slimey with this kind of stuff are elites and religious leaders. outside of these two groups it seems like the general population is pretty tame, akin to east-asian expats in that they’re pretty submissive and afraid of any kind of aggression. Blacks demonstrably commit more rape than any other group, hispanics too

Jesus wanna try that again?

answer my question: where are the stats, why are you trying to relate an outlier population in a racey industry, populated by rich famous men with the a world population? there’s no logical reason to do this and no one who works in criminology would think this is a valid methodology for research. i just want to see actual stats about the gen pop, israel’s rape rate is fairly modest compared to places in africa or mexico or central america, it has a 50% muslim population too added on there. So im just curious where are your numbers and why are you purposefully ignoring that whyte men commit most sexual assault against minors in america? concise enough for you stormie?
this is posturing you’re not actually giving me evidence, you posted a meme chart, a large number of those women are accusers not confirmed victims, the nature of the assault was groping or quid-pro-quo not violent rape, most of the accusers were adults or later teens who knew exactly what kind of environment thy were in. Im sorry its not the same as blacks brutally assaulting women in the streets or the asian slave trade or whytes rayping their kids

like dude format your posts for general readability

...

please respond to my question stormfag, where is the evidence that the general population of jews has a higher propensity for sexual assault, you mentioned per capita relative to other groups. but posted no data that concurs with that.

I’m just surprised that you’re now refusing to engage and you’ve both backed off and now don’t want to contend with what i said. So, i’ll ask again nicely:

Could you supply me with per capita data from Israel and the diaspora that suggests Jews specifically are more likely to commit sexual assault than other races, especially whyte europeans and whyte europeans in america

If you would give me that information, I could better discourse with you about this. If not then i stand by what i said: You simply picked on a unique circumstance where rich, famous elites abused their power to victimize primarily adult women, starlets, who were already in a sexually charged environment and also primarily were asked to do sexual favors, rather than being violently assaulted (tho in some cases this may not have been the case and there probably were actual rayps that occurred).

I agree about Singer being a real predator. he has all the signs and Geffen his handler is probably also one too. But, this does not entail the rest of your arguments premises or its conclusion are true.

Formatted adequately to your liking stormie i hope my stormnig friend from /pol/ whose not trying to escape me im sure

It was about America's famous men and not Israel though.

You write like a poo in loo.

ok if you can’t engage then im forced to conclude that what you were attempting to do is cast aspersions you were not prepared to prove were true, thus it was what is called grey propaganda. This is a kind of propaganda where a little truth is used to advance a false conclusion as gospel. Im sorry but then that really means you are just a dumb stormnigger. You’re not willing to do the most basic courtesy of showing data to back up empirical claims that could be easily verified. Stormniggers are always like this, they throw something out that’s plausible and then back off when the veracity of the claim is proven to be poor. Im sorry stormie you guys lose again

>autism

ok well i guess you don’t want to make me believe because you don’t have anything to say. im sorry you failed again stormie, i tried this with the fed reserve guys and the holocaust deniers and they do the same thing. initial offering of info, the info is incomplete and doesn’t say what they want it to, then posturing “hurr hurr stupid you don’t think there’s MORE” and then i ask for elaboration and then they shut down or start spamming memes. It just makes you look dumb as a group.
but that chart is just the people who were accused of sexual assault from harvey gate, its not even an accurate picture of all the jews who are famous in america, and its not even including most hollywood employees who are jewish. i just don’t see what its supposed to mean beyond insinuations which might work rhetorically on stormfront for stormniggers in stormie retard land, but anywhere else outside of stormfront or /pol/ or salo forum it just doesn’t fly. You have to back up claims with evidence thoroughly especially these kinds of claims

the story of art
critical theory today

two big game changers in my life.

>I'm outclassed intellectually I'll just post puerile cartoons

Absolutely based. Here is another far left french book from the same publishing house. The English title is "Willing slaves of Capital" (a shitty translation desu).

im actually giggling, this has happened every single time i’ve tried talking to them about the JQ in depth. they can’t handle the lack of empirical evidence for anything they claim. Its just astounding

Authors of these books? There are many books by these titles.

>year 2000+10+7
>French theorists still shining about capitalism like it's 1958

>arguing with brainlets

Antisemitism is a symptom if illiteracy in multiple humanities

Are you saying it is pure coincidence that they have been kicked out of nations in ~2000 years 300+ times? They're the only constant.

critical theory today is tyson
the story of art is gombrich

its seriously the first thing that comes up when you google them. did you really need help with this?

one is a basic breakdown of all fields of critical theory. the other is the entire history of art and how its understood or was understood.

Yes fellow goy why do the goyim hate us so much? Surely the problem lies with the goyim and not us.

>pic
The list isn't even complete.

>Year 1789 + 228
>Capitalism is still the dominant economic system in France.
I sure hope we can stop complaining soon.

>300+ times
it was 189 last week, what happened did the psychosis you suffer from evolve?
>all the countries mang
most of those countries were Catholic, Protestant or Islamic which are faiths that despise Jews, and a small resilient minority being ousted from aggressive hegemonic civilizations isn’t weird at all. Whytes were kicked out of like 50-75 countries in the last 100 years remember? Algeria, Uganda, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Kenya, India, Bangladesh, China, Japan, Korea, Indochina, Brazil, Central America. I don’t know why this is even something worth bringing up. The romans persecuted them because they were tenacious pests who wanted to keep their culture and trade practices and didn’t want to be genocided via assimilation. like whytes don’t want to be by arabs and hispanics. Its the same principle, whytes are just a bigger and more successful group

and again its interesting you all had to back off the initial claims because they’re nonsense. now its back to typical stormfaggot cannards

>It's the other people's fault
Classic deflection.W hy do you hate Christianity

the Jews were temporarily expelled from England so Edward didn’t have to pay back his loans you fucking retard Jews were middlemen for the nobility and they got fucked constantly in loan agreements that’s why they’re such aggressive creditors historically in the last 400 years. they routinely would get fleeced by nobleman

>IT'S NOT OUR FAULT!!!!!!
>IT'S ALL A COINDEICEE GOYYYYYYYYY

>JEWS ARE THE VICTIMS
>IT'S NOT OUR FAULT!!!!!!!!!
Are you just a brainlet or are you dishonest?

why is it so much easier to accuse a jew of sexual assualt? im tired of antisemitism

Those Talmud quotes are, when not fake, grossly misrepresented. (But of course you haven't done any research)

Taking Jewish expulsion as a meaningful index of their racial perfidy is overlooking the content of particular expulsions in favor of the overarching pattern.

(I've never met someone who read Kevin Mcdonald's books who knew anything about anything he talks about prior to his books. I tend to assume the people who advocate for his books are boorish and poor)

>Those Talmud quotes are, when not fake, grossly misrepresented
Oy vey. Hi there shlomo. So that's why you're so dishonest.

>the industry which this occurred in was Jewish dominated

It's fine that your credulous and mostly illiterate, but you do yourself a disservice by wearing it like armor.

Seething. You're either dishonest or a brainlet. Either way I won't have a serious discussion with you.

I recommend you read this shlomo. You might learn why people hate you so much.

Just a coincidence goy. Your credulous and mostly illiterate!!!!!!!

I have read Culture of critique. I don't think you've read anything else.

You aren't capable of a serious "discussion" just posting .jpg "redpills" culled from other unlearned plebes.