1. William Faulkner
2. Franz Kafka
3. Virginia Woolf
4. James Joyce
5. Gertrude Stein
6. Samuel Beckett
7. Anton Chekhov
8. Vladimir Nabokov
9. Marcel Proust
10. Fyodor Dostoevsky
Greatest writers of all time
Other urls found in this thread:
>Faulkner #1
>no Shakespeare or Blake
You could have just said it was a joke post
>tfw loved Absalom, Absalom! so much that I gave Faulkner a cameo in a pregnant Anne Frank fanfic
Joyce, Shakespeare, Hemingway are top 3 and McCarthy is the best living.
DFW and Pinecone unironically deserves at least a top ten spot.
>DFW and Pinecone unironically deserves at least a top ten spot.
Kill yourself
McCarthy ruined reading for me for a year. I read "The Road" and was a little bit optimistic at the end. After talking with other people, though, I realized my absolute stupidity and didn't touch a book for a while.
Their prose is better than 99.999% of writers and you're a faggot if you think otherwise
>Hemingway
>top 3
wew
Also Pincone's maybe top 50. DFW isn't even top 200.
The Road's his least complicated work lmao.
You're missing some amazing poets. Why do people always think poets are worse writers than prose stylists?
See
Hemingway is a master, better than Twain or Faulkner. No other writer can pour so many details with what isn't said into fewer words.
Fucking idiot I don't care if it's bait
I know. That's my point. It made me realize I was a goddamn idiot
No one thinks that in fact the poetic medium is obviously greater pound for pound. Most on Veeky Forums don't read poetry, and that is the most powerful pleb filter.
Try reading Joyce. Even a smart person will feel humbled by Ulysses.
You have shit taste. Hemingway is middle brow for a reason.
The best writers (Melville, Shakespeare) are prose poets
I actually had to read "Portrait of The Artist" for school. Thought the concept was interesting and some parts were beautiful, but I think ~95% of it went over my head.
>taste influences the best
See this is worst of all, thinking your favorite dead writers are better. If you think Hemingway being a writing elite is a matter of opinion you're just a toothless scrub.
I tried to jump into Ulysses and I loved it just for his diction and flow, but it's CRAZY the fucking depth he goes. He spent 7 years making a puzzle of a book only outmatched by the 20 years he spent on Finnegans Wake.
11. Me
Ezra Pound, Tolstoi and Edgar Allen Poe are the only writers deserving of "best" that aren't Shakespeare
1. Cervantes
2. Goethe
3. who cares
you literally can’t argue with me
>Goethe
Hemingway's has impressive control over his writing but pales to the sublimity power of a methodically-wild writer like Faulkner. Hemingway could be described as a top-tier example of a writers workshop genius, but not an artistic genius.
>prose command isn't artistic
What the fuck do you even value?
Faulkner is a better storyteller, but if you break down writing into its natural subdivisions you end up with ten lists of ten names. Honestly the ranking of artists is THE most pretentious thing you can do but denying one artist's greatness to hoist up another is just being a lil fanboi bitch.
>this is your brain if you were born in america
No but fucking seriously, David Foster Wallace:
>prose is better than 99.999% of writers
Jesus fucking Christ, you goddamned undergraduate twenty year old american, get your head out of your ass. Do you think Sufjan is superior to Bach as well?
I don't compare older dead guys to less old dead guys. I appreciate what an artist does in their time and place with the resources available.
Bach has NO bangers
Hemingway has moral vision on the same scale, he's just been slandered and judged by his poorest work and judged through his poor imitators. You wouldn't derive your opinions of Faulkner from Pylon, would you?
Go back and read the short stories, and the major novels and try to let go of your preconceptions of him as some kind of macho dude or whatever.
Monolingual red blooded American. What's it like knowing that everyone but England and Germany has inferior prose, poetry AND philosophy?
Prose command is a component of art, yes, but not the art itself. Overall I see Faulkner as far superior.
Well you could be right. My conception comes from reading Hemingway a while ago.
I mean is it worth it to keep reading if I suck at it?
op.. easy on the modernists
Post the Proust pasta
Embarrassing.
You’re not wrong.
To each their own, but putting Stein on a greatest of all time list is pushing it, let alone placing her above Proust, Beckett, etc. And Faulkner certainly doesn't rate next to Shakespeare, Homer, Dante, Virgil, Lucretius, Cao Xueqin, dozens of others.
>Homer not number 1
Filthy commoners
ok. ok. wow. just. ok. here are the true rankings, and I would go as far as saying that the rest of fiction as a whole is a waste of time, and you're better off reading poetry or watching TV instead of reading authors who are not in this list
SUPREME MASTER GOD TIER: THE MASTER OF ALL IN THE KINGDOM OF GREAT WRITERS IN HUMAN HISTORY, AT THE TOP OF THE HIGHEST TOWER, MASTURBATING 10-15 TIMES PER DAY, AS THE HAND WITH WHICH HE WRITES ARTISTIC MASTERPIECES IS MORE SEXUALLY APPEALING THAN ANY ADONIS THE GODS CAN CONJURE
>Proust
VICE-SUPREME MASTER GOD TIER: THE ONLY WRITER DESERVING TO BE IN SAME ROOM AS THE SUPREME MASTER GOD
>Joyce
GOD TIER: OCCUPYING THE MARBLE CASTLE WITH THE SUPREME AND VICE SUPREME MASTER GOD
>Tolstoy
>Homer
>Dante
>Dostoevsky
>Shakespeare
ANGELIC DEMON TIER: PATROLLING THE CASTLE WALLS OF THE GOD TIERS AND ABOVE, AND DOING THEIR BIDDING ACROSS THE UNIVERSE, CAPTURING AND PILLAGING ENTIRE PLANETS TO TO INTO PLANET-SIZED "THE MATRIX"-TYPE BODY HARVESTING FARMS, BUT THEY HARVEST HUMAN FARTS INSTEAD OF ELECTRICITY, PACKED IN DIAMOND JARS, FOR THE FART-LOVING PROUST AND JOYCE TO HOLD UP TO THEIR NOSES AND SHIFT THEIR NOSES LEFT AND RIGHT ALONG THE RIM OF THE JAR LIKE SNIFFING A FINE WINE, THEN TAKING A HUMONGOUS INHALE AND ACHIEVING UNFATHOMABLE ORGASM, "AH, A 2017 RUSSIAN LUMBERJACK FART, GOOD YEAR" THEY SAY, NODDING THEIR HEADS AT THE ANGELIC DEMONS WHO DO THEIR BIDDING, THE ANGELIC DEMONS' HEARTS FILLED WITH JOY AT THE HONOR OF SERVING THEIR MASTERS
>Goethe
>Kafka
>Chekhov
>Morrissey
>Nabakov
>Melville
>Chaucer
>Cervantes
>Ambrose motherfucking Bierce!
HONORABLE DRAGON WORK CREATURE TIER: THESE WRITERS' SOULS HAVE POSSESSED THE BODIES OF DRAGONS WITH LIME GREEN FUR AND FLORESCENT TIGER STRIPES WHO BREATHE GAMMA RAY BURSTS AND CIRCLE THE SUPREME MASTER GOD'S KINGDOM BY THE MILLIONS, AND OPERATE AS A HIVE MIND, AND HAVE BEEN GENETICALLY MODIFIED WITH TARDIGRADE DNA TO SURVIVE IN SPACE AND EVEN BLACK HOLES, TO HONOR WORKS THAT I ENJOYED PERSONALLY BUT THAT MAY NOT BE AS JUSTIFIED ON AN ARTISTIC LEVEL BY CONSENSUS
>Hesse
>Pynchon
>Hemingway
>Foster Wallace
>Woolf
>Flaubert
>George Eliot
>Balzac
>Borges
Thoughts on this list?
Ñ
This is actually a nice ranking, but
>Proust
Keep trying, kiddo.
>01. William Shakespeare
>02. Homer
>03. Dante Alighieri
>04. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
>05. Herman Melville
>06. Fyodor Dostoyevsky
>07. Miguel de Cervantes
>08. William Butler Yeats
>09. Leo Tolstoy
>10. James Joyce
>Chekhov
top kek m8 he's not fit to lick Pushkin's boots
>no Goethe
>Morrissey
u fucking wot m8
Seems kind of random at parts, especially with the mix of science and philosophy. What exactly is the criteria here?
sick lists, my dudes. here’s my own, let me know what you guys think:
1. me
2. me
3. me
4. me
5. me
6. my
7. mother
8. fucking
9. diary
10. desu
I'd rank fucking over mother but the rest looks good
Your taste is so fucking basic.
1. Shakespeare
2. Kadare
3. McCarthy
4. Melville
5. Cervantes
6. Nabokov
7. Kazantzakis
8. Faulkner
9. Hasek
10. Wolfe
>ctrl+f
>no conrad
You basic bitches
Meme garbage
these lists make me want to burn all my books
Lewis Carrol
Shakespeare
Joyce
Voltaire
Rabelas
Hugo
Keats
Fitzgerald
Poe
Hesse
>Voltaire
>Carrol
>even top 20
the rest is sound
1 shakespeare
2 milton
3 melville
4 rilke
5 dostoevsky
6 virginia woolf
7 franz kafka
8 don delillo
9 cormac mccarthy
10 emily dickinson
Why would Pynchon not be on the list? He's stylistically better than all of them probably. Do detractors say his substance is lacking or what? Just curious.
Homer
Dostoevsky
Nietzsche
Chekhov
Shakespeare
Rochefoucauld
Poe
Tolstoy
>Dostoevsky above Tolstoy
nice to see Veeky Forums is still full of immature edgemasters
>Kafka
The pleb-tier quality of posters who mistake depressive and ultimately subversive teenage-directed misanthropy for good writing never ceases to amaze me. Can you emotionally move beyond 16? Is it really that difficult? Because anyone who does quickly realizes that Kafka is a horrible writer.