If no one reads a book, but it contains incredibly important new revolutionary knowledge that could change the course of the species drastically for eternity, should the author consider it a failure or a great achievement for himself?
If no one reads a book...
Other urls found in this thread:
amazon.com
arxiv.org
athletic.net
independent.co.uk
libcom.org
twitter.com
Goonan! it's been a while, how's life treatin' ya?
Did you read the book?
amazon.com
Strange reviews
get
help
I think it's safe to assume it does not
...
Wtf?
A failure, the whole purpose of the book is to communicate and spread knowledge of the author.
An author might try and take solace in the idea that perhaps future generations might rediscover it or that it was rejected because of its power but these tend to be coping mechanisms and rationalisations.
Fuck you; go back to your kike masters. One day you will be begging for my mercy.