>The guy won a Nobel Prize in physics,
Appeal to authority fallacy.
>He contributed to quantum physics, quantum electrodynamics, particle physics, quantum computing and nanotechnology.
In what way? Did any of his work assist in the engineering of new tech?
>I hope that someday I'll be able to make posts this low quality
>No argument
>Black twitter tier meme-pic.
You already are bud.
>Creativity is far more important in research mathematics.
Creativity and IQ are positively correlated.
> Veeky Forums iq poster
It's highly likely that you took an online IQ test and use it as a coping mechanism, but explain to me how IQ correlates with success when your IQ is above 100?
So OP's threshold theory is incorrect? IQ and creativity are positively correlated even past thresholds of 120-125?
What the fuck are you talking about.
Feynman was nothing like NDT or Bill Nye.
Feynman pioneered Quantum Electrodynamics, and he created the mathematics with is central to how quantum mechanics is formalized today. He worked on the Manhattan project for Christ sake. Actual physicists rank him highly among the most significant physicists of the 20th century.
It takes one set on of skills to pull it over on the public, an altogether different set to do so on the professional physics community.
It’s you who doesn’t understand the basics of what you’re talking about. Partical Physics is hardly speculative, literally that’s what all the the partical accelerators are built to investigate, and with them you can detect things like quarks.
You know what else can detect bosons? Your eyes. Light particles (photons) are a type of boson. Gluons are another type of Boson, specifically the boson which mediates the connection of quarks. Weird, it all fits together, like some sort of “Standard Model of Particle Physics”.
I suppose it all seems like magic when you aren’t bright enough to actually understand it, but it’s not. You clearly watch too much tv, and didn’t pay enough attention in math class. Stop letting the stupidly simplistic garbage that physicists say when they guest on talk shows be your entire understanding of the profession.
The deepest irony of all is that you finish off with ‘hes a con artist, unlike Tesla’, an actual famous con artist, notorious for stealing the inventions of others and but having superior salesman skills, and now is the subject of a internet cult which worships his writing from his descent into senility.
the modern tests are calibrated to diagnose retarded and mentally handicapped people. literally. andt hen to have the data be parsimonious among age groups, meaning it must be structured such that
year old can take it
it specifically prioritises things like spatial cognition and things like pupil reaction. things that correlate to G by virtue of being genetically correlated to mutational load, but they are things that are measured n fucking dogs
the old myers briggs test is fine and has hardly ny error to it you fag
Yes, but more so in a way that would piss off an IQ evangelist. The aspergerian world view of applying IQ to everything is quite annoying, I know people like that in real life.
But IQ and creativity are not. Most creative people are smart but most smart people are not creative.
IQ tests just measure how good you are at IQ tests.