Thoughts?

thoughts?

Another non-white jews prop up as a writer, give money to, and send on tours to attack white people and claim that's who's in charge instead of jews. Seeing this act a lot lately, aren't we? Hootspah will be blowing back though...

jews arent in charge of the world

Who said they were?

you're not allowed to say that

>I mean,

How would I go about eradicating this from collective speech and writing? I don’t have much else going on so I can devote my life to it.

meme it, like how youre not allowed to say, "im not racist, i have black friends" anymore even though it's a decent argument

>some moronic turd colored spic animal got paid money to write that trash

They should be though

Pages are white because it offers the most contrast against the text. Staining the paper black and bleaching the words is inefficient although clearly the more racially-sensitive and thus best method.

>even the page is white

the absolute state of literature in 2017

I print all my books on black paper but the text is kinda hard to read because it's still black for extra superiority.
Maybe Natalie will like me now...

mentally challenged

funny

>typical American power structure

Kek, blue-pilled as fuck.

What if Jews just had a genetic disposition to an interest in literature?

>typical American power structures

What did she mean by this?

Jews are the ones promoting the degradation of it. They're iconoclasts to the depths of their souls.

You couldn't pick a worse group.

This.

Posts like that make me think the human race is overdue for a culling.

they do, their whole culture is oriented towards language. the Irish are the only other race I can think of whose that obsessed with transcribing, reciting and storytelling.
jealousy, envy, spite
jealousy, envy, spite
jealousy, envy, spite

It's all memorization of talmudic texts. Jews are bad storytellers and writers because they aren't creative.

The dimensions of a book are designed to teach the audience. It's not designed like a blueprint or a bank note. The vagueness and the construction of the blacks, the texture of the ink, the parchment, the softness of the page are all ergonomically designed to make reading a learning experience. If it were cheaper and more effective to teach the reader through black pages and white ink, printers would have switched a long time ago.

>Jews are bad storytellers
no, Hollywood, the Bible and Kafka contradict this
>they aren’t creative
yes they are, they’re genius scientists, doctors, financial experts, mathematicians and mystics. they’re extremely creative. much more so than most of the european races and certainly far outpacing Asiatics, Blacks and Hispanics. Germans, Irish and Anglos are the only races that rival them.

She's right but not in the way she thinks.

Hollywood is shit and jews there are managers, not creative people; most of those jobs are done by whites. The bible is comprised of stories jews stole from others and are not of their own creation, and kafka isn't a good writer.

You're ignorant on this topic, jewish intelligence is based on rote memorization and they do poorly on spatial intelligence tests that measure creativity.

Your average Amerimutt is a thoughtless creature. A hollow dog manipulated by its fanatical devotion to archaic pseudo-science, racialism, and capitalism.

...

That's not a decent argument - the difficulty in racism is the unconscious prejudice, which obviously is difficult for you to perceive directly, and which is derivative of the social power structures you inhabit. So you can be racist and think you're not and act like you're not and have black friends. Another interesting thing is the extent to which your black friends hold the corresponding systemic position for the oppressed, how they also cohere to structural racism, don't escape the ideology just by being its victims.
This is all really simple and you shouldn't be finding it difficult to understand.
You're not a fully rational entity down to the bottom of your boots, you shouldn't wander around under the illusion that you are.

>the difficulty in racism is the unconscious prejudice
Difficulty for whom? And why should I care that some asshat is experiencing "difficulties" w.r.t racism?

The bourgeois spirit functions by taking things that were once difficult to grasp, bringing them systematically and commodifiably within easy reach of everybody, and then playing make-believe that the prestige of the thing's original alterity still exists now that it's a commonplace.

Multiple successive generations of women and non-whites have been completely devastated by this mind-cancer, ironically invented by white Europeans, because they are so desperate for an identity and a cause that they grab at the first thing that's available to them, so they inevitably end up grasping the commodified and ossified forms of revolt, ironically also pioneered by white people and turned into commodities by white people.

So instead of revolting against white heteropatriarchy, women and non-whites live in a white heteropatriarchal society that endogenously invented the original forms of "revolt against white heteropatriarchy," THEN invented their commodified forms to service the equally endogenous bourgeois culture industry, and then SOLD those commodified harmless forms of pseudo-revolt to women and non-whites to play with meaninglessly.

The most authentic form of revolt for women and non-whites would be to ask, "Why is it so damn easy for me to 'revolt' in this society? And why, once I've 'revolted,' does nothing actually happen?"

It's always pathetic when one of these women or non-whites fires off a sassy comment about how icky and lame white men are, because it's like seeing a little kid whose dad condescendingly told him that he's a genius going "I'M a genius, you know! You should let me do what I want!" His arrogance is completely founded in the condescension of his master. That's a form of slavery far worse than open
and honest oppression.

One must gaze in awe at the mental gymnastics of the judaized liberal mind. "Racism" is awareness of a response to a threat that is natural, has long evolutionary origins, and has only been in recent years undergone social engineering tactics to try and repress it, like we can eventually shame this instinct out of whites -- who are the only people the word was designed to target anyway, which is another hint that it's a scam word.

Anyone who uses the word "racism," or takes it seriously as anything other than an instinct we should stop thinking we can get rid of, should be laughed at as the quack they are.

But wait, the white page is empty while all the information is contained in the black text

>thoughts?
None were found in OP's picture. Sorry.

> revolting against white heteropatriarchy
If they really wanted to do this, the option of hitching a plane ride to run through the jungles of Kongo butt-naked is always available.

Obviously revolting against "heteropatriarchy" is the last thing they want. They're just hustling a blackface gig that the current demented crop of heteropatriachs love so much.

>white heteropatriarchal society that endogenously invented the original forms of "revolt against white heteropatriarchy," THEN invented their commodified forms to service the equally endogenous bourgeois culture industry, and then SOLD those commodified harmless forms of pseudo-revolt to women and non-whites to play with meaninglessly.

You don't seem to be aware of what a "jew" is; I recommend you do some research and get up to speed so you stop attributing their actions to whites.

But the words are black and everybody knows the words are the most important bit.

If there ever was proof that these people are desperate for anything to prove their point.