Can I read this book to understand Women???

Women are easy to understand. Visit a pigfarm and watch the sows rolling around in their own shit while uttering meaningless snorts and grunts for a few hours. That's everything there is to women. There's nothing more.

its not "bad" conceptually

imagine being this bitter and gay

t. virgin

And men

women can seem nasty, and sometimes they're it's too easy for them hurt... but they're just looking for the best possible outcome for themselves, and that is selfish in that nature, but they want quality offspring

nah, women don't have the same self-introspection skills as men, they struggle to be honest with themselves

just read some red pill stuff, it tells you everything you need to know

If women actually wanted quality offspring there would be no such thing as single motherhood, premarital sex, abortion, feminism, or the modern world.

Almost every girl I know loves this book
Everything I've ever read from it has been the most trite, cliche, wallowing piece of shit I've ever read - I don't understand the appeal whatsoever and it actually repulses me

these things came as a defensive response to increasingly isolated males

men can be -content- with being alone, and mediums such as porn and video games is really enough to keep them living... females literally cannot function without attention and feeling wanted

it's a very complicated subject

>everything is men's fault

Read Genesis 2.

Why do people keep making these threads. If you really hated Rupi Kaur that much then you wouldn't put her work on this literature board lmao makes you look like an incel hoping for an echo chamber. This board is not meant to be your safe space you insecure waste of carbon go back to /pol/

>women want nothing more than to be loved, wanted and desired
>women, knowing this about themselves, have spent the better part of the past century trying to say they dont bekong in the one place where they are loved, wanted, and desired most : the kitchen
A complicated subject, indeed

Why not as mostly men on this board don't we bring up stupid shit men have written and wonder what it means about women? Like that cigarette typewriter dude. He's worse than Kaur but no one ever makes fun of him here.

Oh wait it's because you hate women.

>she says we dont make fun of Bukowski
>literally, in this very thread, which is a thread about making fun of Rupi Kaur, someone stated that her male equivalent is Bukowski
3/10 bait for making me respond

Unironically, Moby Dick

my aggressive take would be it's a bunch of inept men who struggle to find their place in the world socially and sexually, bitterness is not without cause & effect

i can ensure you, it's not much easier for women

That's true. Inept men here bring up inept women as if we couldn't cherry pick a million stupid/terrible things men have done.

people are universally broken

Only sort of true. There is no universal, remember, so some people are okay. Maybe not you but let's be honest if you have internet access the likelihood is also that you have access to programs that will help you finish your novel and you're probably not starving. So. Yah know. Good things happen too.

It's like I'm really on Redit.

nice strawman bro

No, the fallacy I'm basing my argument on is very clearly guilt by association, not a straw man. Learn to use logic.

>you rip on rupi and not on seattle dude
rupi had her book published and praised, while andrew is a literal who to the rest of the world

Except his book is published by McNeel, the same exact press that published Kaur. Fuck dude look shit up.

kek, updooted

yes it is

Your assumption that I use Reddit is the strawman

>i don't understand the female condition at all
>proceeds to judge and mock it anyway
this place, man...

Is he secretly trolling?

instagram.com/p/BdB2f8QB_KI/?hl=en&taken-by=collin_andrew_yost

The value of the book, in this case, would be to act as an article of self reflection. Why do the women you know love it? And why do you hate it? Consider without automatically lashing out at the book and the women.

strawman
>an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.
guilt by association
ad hominem
>an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of their argument.

rare good post

>having any expectations or presumptions of how an anonymous chinese cartoon imageboard will respond to hot modern topics
also, can we please stop making milk and honey threads?
like seriously, we get it, it's bad people like it, what's new?
the popular masses have been liking bad things since the beginning of time, it's practically the backbone of society

no. i'd say that the majority of the people shitting on this book are women. it'd be a bad example and a disgrace to the female sex

no you can't make me

...

reddit.com/r/justneckbeardthings/comments/6pfmim/this_incredible_poem_by_ready_player_one_author/

>45yo male
>married first time last year to a 39yo fat feminist poet
>no kids
lawlzouls

...is lighting a whole city an image of completeness? What is it that when added to whatever is lighting a whole city sets the city on fire?

I mean, I guess this sort of style can be kinda pretty if you don't think at all about the connections between images and words, but none of this seems to reward any ounce of reflection.

Vonnegut or ridiculously trite/edgy self-published poetry

Murdered three days later by white knight feminist mafia RIP lil homie

most girls I know think this shit's stupid, aside from the delusional art hoes

Went to bookstore and read it there without paying for it. It unironically reads like r9k post, one of bigger "redpills" you could read, so just go there. If majority of women sympathise with this shit, and see themselves in it, then they truly are shit and not worth it.

Meme book for men is Meditations.