Welcome to ROUND 2 of the philosopher's bracket
I'm continuing the bracket for best philosopher and I created another one for the worst philosopher
Vote here:
Autistic Analytics + Americans:
polljunkie.com
polljunkie.com
Moderns:
polljunkie.com
polljunkie.com
Continentals:
polljunkie.com
polljunkie.com
Ancients+Medievals:
polljunkie.com
polljunkie.com
Other urls found in this thread:
polljunkie.com
polljunkie.com
discord.gg
twitter.com
>tfw the "worst" ancients/medievals are much better philosophers than the "best" analytics
>Foucault beat Camus
Fucking disgusting.
camus wasnt evem a philosopher
If Kierkegaard doesn't win his quarter/section, I know this board is damned. Whoever seeded these folks has great taste.
It'll obviously come down to Kierkegaard/Plato vs. Kant. The winner will be either of the former.
>Frege vs. Whitehead
tough choice.
Camus was Kierk-lite, moreso than Sartre. God bless him, but he's a featherweight against the more interesting Foucault.
>tfw im smarter than 95% these philosophers
>tfw i understand all there shit intuitively and can deconstruct anything
Philosophy is for brainlets lol
>If Kierkegaard doesn't win his quarter/section, I know this board is damned.
Even if Husserl wins???
Plato vs. Kant, though expected, would be a very honest and fair end to this battle royale. I hope that Aquinas pulls out ahead of Aristotle, but that is unlikely.
As much as I love Kierk, I have to agree with another user who called him "a philosophical dead-end." Any person who tries to formalize or de-Christianize him (e.g. Heidegger) will be more derivative than insightful. He is an Individual all on his lonesome.