Which is the best Lolita cover?

Posts like these make me worry about buying books secondhand

/thread

You forgot the best one

That is the best one, but you can’t actually buy it anywhere I don’t think. It was just a for-fun cover design contest iirc.

Legitimately the best one

1. 2. (f)
3. (a)
4. (e)
5. (d)
6. (b)
7. (c)
8.

/thread

Lolita was 12 mate, it's pedophilia. Also being an ephebophile in 21st century western society means youre either under ~22 or are broken in some way that you're basically a pedo. I understand that some girls within the defined age range (15-19) look like sexually mature adult women, but if you feel the need to identify young girls specifically then it's not their sexual maturity you're attracted to.

no this

Should i be worried if i got a boner while reading this book?

>Lolita was 12 mate, it's pedophilia. Also being an ephebophile in 21st century western society means youre either under ~22 or are broken in some way that you're basically a pedo.
Absolute state of soyboys.

Nice try pal but I eat my onions and am exclusively attracted to adults

You missed the Balthus one

...

What the fuck is wrong with her foot?

it's modern art bro perspective is like, imperialist and shit, dog

Maybe she's chinese

Is the plastic wrapper on the lolly on (f) anachronistic?

Yeah.

...

Oh fug, this.
I also spotted a Spanish translation of Lolita in a Goodwill once that had a lovely cover.
Almost bought it, but saw the language and had to put it back. Some lady ended up buying it. I wonder if she knew it was in Spanis? I wonder if she cared?

You're right to be worried.

Not as long as you feel guilty about it.

Name 10 artists from the 20th century and I'll let you pretend to know what you're talking about.

>ACKSHULLY the correct term is ephebosexual
>don't judge me
Nabokov wrote Lolita to show the reader that the way it was written would make them sympathize with a pedophile.

I wonder if pseuds like you even held a copy of Lolita, because you sure as shit didn't read it.

Nobokov wanted that young cooch user, sorry to break it to you but the rest is bullshit just to get away with writing about it

this

My hero desu

Damn.

...

This, and D

Shit book though

How Islamophobic.

For me it’s (e)

This one is great

youtube.com/watch?v=kIW78kwVLcg
I also like the one with the scrunchie and with the crushed lolipop

Was this ever published though? Otherwise it’s

>with the crushed lolipop
best one imo.

I want a personalized lolita cover, should I just print out some loli porn and tape it to the cover?

Out of those, I'd say F. But I like pic related the most. Shame someone threw away my book jacket, but I still like the plain cover that just says Lolita on it too.

ofc yes

>a
Good, simple, themed design. (Biased because I have it)
>b
Looks like YA shit that sits on airport shelves
>c
Looks like discount shit printed on cheap paper
>d
Nice, sadly it's in spanish
>e
The stamp makes it look like discount shit too
>f
Again, sort of YA looking though not as bad, looks a bit too modern for what it really is.

All of Modernista’s Nabokov covers are gorgeous.

J U I C Y
U
I
C
Y

A) good
B) Bad
C) Meh
D) Decent
E) Bad
F) Best.

The most crucial part of the story is Humbert Humbert's commentary. The diary he kept should be represented, the red has a dualistic symbolism as both love/blood, and it looks neat as the o in the title.

F) is the patrician choice.

this one is really underrated

What's this book about?

Evil little jeezebel seduces and entraps innocent man. Hilarity ensues.

I've got this one. Never seen it posted here before.

>Book of the highest quality materials
>Squander it all by putting the author on the cover

What did they mean by this?

>old pervy man fondling not yet fully blossomed flower
It’s perfect

Those sepia Everyman's are really ugly

>When the cute librarian tells you her favourite book is Lolita

...

I can't not make this joke. Wait a sec...

freenet:USK@jAJL0keO0Z72U7MxQpAEfVEkd-PdclIea5xPtSIgBDs,uflh2mHHWSYIre4AZjhdw9kCB79MajTRdrsfbmmTWro,AQACAAE/70sMagScans/6/pages/LOL.html
47 has the best cover.

If you live in some prude country that spies on its citizens, don't go deeper without a plausible deniability scheme and a traceless livecd system inside a DMZ.

>Hide both hands because you can't draw hands
>only have to draw 1 foot
>fuck it up
>accidentally make the girl korean

My man

...

what kind of tuning is that

>memorize retards from my secret club of pseuds
Lol no

I'm partial to (a) or

As a side note, the poster for the movie is also great

>love story
What?

The Spanish translation is bad

C because it's hilarious.

I just got banned from reddit. Great thread.

aren't all of anagrama's books in spanish?

just make a new account, then go back you absolute faggot

This is unironically the worst one.

F since it draws directly from the novel and doesn't assert any preconceptions

The Annotated Lolita is really the only edition you should read. It includes Nabokov's revisions which makes a huge difference.

This is the one I have, kinda meh.

Same.
Shame it doesn't also include the Russian translations additions to the afterword. Anyone know a book that includes this in English?