I've been stroking my metaphorical cock for ages over my taste in news-media...

idk everyone has an agenda and i can't determine who pushes the least agenda or with whom agenda i agree with

btw this exists to check biases on media companies mediabiasfactcheck.com/
i don't have the patience to go through them but someone might find it useful

I make sure to get my news from national socialists, nationalists, libertarians, anarchists, communists and social democrats. There is no way to get unbiased news so try to get some from all different biases and piece together.

I do this as well
Democracy Now
Al Jazeera
Brietbart

>Breitbart
breitbart.com/tech/2017/12/17/rise-feminist-witches/

There's a difference between having a slant and having propoganda.

What sort of pleb could enjoy the new Yorker?

How are leftists as retarded as yourself still being replicated in the current year/environment, assuming you're not a woman, a tranny, or a non-white?

>calls someone retarded
>reads fucking breitbart
please get

I don't read Breitbart, I'm merely marveling over how you think that jewish right publication is any more propagandistic than jewish left publications. Are you a low-IQ non-white, is that why?

If you are lucky enough to be English, add Private Eye to this list.

Dude witches take themselves very seriously
bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39090334

First Things

>Private Eye

>Are you a low-IQ non-white, is that why?
I'm a 6'6'' high-test black intersex titan. My IQ is immeasurable. I get my news from the weather.com opinion page.

Magazines are obsolete, they were necessary before the internet as a means to understand a fields culture from the outside but entirely unnecessary and even counterproductive

Join a Pall Mall club and bathe in all the titles that they take.

>jews can't be ideologically opposed
>jews can't be individuals
>jews are part of a hivemind whose only goal is world domination
I thought you fascists were crazy.

>national socialists/nazis
>but not communists
I don't think your viewpoint is as wide as you think.

>trusts a website to tell him what is politically slanted

I read about 2-3 hours of news a day,

>Foreign Affairs is a must-have.
>The Economist is borderline essential; you'll struggle to find informative long pieces of such a range of topics anywhere else. Gives good, general overview. Would need to complement with more frequent media, or something that goes into depth in the area that interests you.
>WSJ is really, really strong. If you're interested in finance, business or economics, there really isn't a substitute. It's opinion section is a cesspit, and will always be fairly slow to report on things. Complements the NYT fairly well desu.
>The New Yorker is a strange one. Since the election cycle, any political and cultural comment will be the typical liberal elite dross, but they write fantastic long-form general pieces once a week or so.
>The Atlantic can be readable, also puts out a lot of sensationalist rubbish. I've come across The Atlantic articles on topics I'm reasonably well-informed on, and found them jejune and out of their depth.

Haven't found any other news source worthwhile desu. I use letterboxd, Veeky Forums, goodreads and blogs for literary and film recommendations; publications always have safe, uninteresting opinions.

A few proposals I have:
The American Interest
Commentary
Pro Publica
Al Jazeera
Spiked Review (left wing libertarian)
The Diplomat

And in case you can read german:
Netzpolitik
Novo Argumente
Jungle World
Ruhrbarone
Dekoder
Übermedien
Krautreporter
konkret
deutschlandfunk
taz

>Old Media
Read these instead:
Jacobite Mag
Thermidor
Social Matter

>exemplary articles
>The Atlantic
They have one maybe two articles actually worth reading each *decade*.

OP, maybe give Oxford American, Paris Review, NY Review of Books, etc a try. New Yorker is OK but not great, and the Atlantic has been shit ever since they moved their headquarters out of New England and to New York.