Is it true?

Name another type.

As a Marxist this seems about right to me. I don’t know if I would carve out a specific category for ‘theists’.
It makes sense to me that ‘jaded reacrionaries’ would be on the very highest because by their very exceptionalness they can’t fit into the normal communities of average people, and their stand out abilities mean they will drift to the top of institutions. The fundamental error they make is to invision that all rulers would be a smart and virtuous as themselves, and that political machination wouldn’t cause idiot incompetents to become Kings. They fail to remember that the enlightened despot is the exception, not the rule.

I also wouldn’t include that batch of reactionaries except for Spengler.

>stormfags at the bottom

The ehtnonationalist stance can be reached independently, you're conflating intellectual flavours with visceral ones.
You know this is a crude generalization.

>As a Marxist

mfw 140iq normie

>as a Marxist

According to online iq tests I'm a faded reactionary.

Marxists can't do basic algebra.

>As a Marxist

go suck more zog cock

>Bernie Bros
>Higher IQ than conservadumbs
Have you actually talked to any of his followers? Some of the most juvenile conversations I've ever had in my entire life.

Even intelligent people can be infected by herd mentality.

yes
t. marxist

Swap egoists and milquetoast liberals and you got yourself one accurate chart

lmao conservatives (contemporary) are def worse imho

bernouts are more likely to be college educated at least (which does correlate with iq)

Not realizing that Israel is a weaponizable example of the ethnostate.

chess is for normies?

...

They're pretty awful but I have had much worse convos with conservatives

Egoists are fucking retards.

>bernouts are more likely to be college educated
In my experience the opposite seems to be more true, the people with degrees who do advocate for him are always drowning in student debt (an issue worth addressing but not with the "solutions" Bernie had).

90iq schizoid go.

lol i go to a school with need based financial aid and most people here still supported him. bernie was pretty popular among the young affluent and educated. hillary ironically did better among the working class.

What does the chess piece represent, chess players?

I identify mostly with the jaded reactionaries, but I don't think I'm as smart as any of them

I had to do an IQ test when applying for my job and I got a 135. I'm also very right winged.

Explains why you got sub-140

>conservatis are dum lol xDD
>fukin trumpsters! more like dumpsters lol!!
Ebin

>bernie was pretty popular among the young affluent
the usual consumers of snake oil

Is that Aleister Crowley on the right? This chart is one big piece of bait lmao

Normies are literally pawns of the establishment.

>right winged

You’re a worldbeater alright

>t. deluded faggot
The image is equating normies with pawns

cuz they act like fucking machines;
it's too idealistic intended for humans being rational, but we're far from it

that's spengler

Normies are the only true rebels left

no and whoever made it wasted their time

Minarchists.

Intelligence only predicts competence. Personality predicts behavior.

>Nearly all religious people are conservative
>Theists score near the highest, conservatives the lowests
>Marxists above Stormfags
>Normies above anyone
I'd say it's pretty retarded OP

THIS IS NOT LITERATURE

MODS WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING

>As a Marxist

>he thinks we have mods here

libertarian socialists
that chick who burned her obama tshirt

>tfw traditionalist reactionary

Look at the pictures, "conservadumb" clearly does not refer to all conservatives.

An oxymoron?

National Socialists are barbarian offspring of romantic nihilism, an attempt at creating the future... which necessitates the destruction of both liberal democracy and monarchy and its society's vestigial feudalism. Some reactionary impulses underly the movement, but more as a matter of exploitation than of intellectual parity. There is very little that is traditional in Nazism... if anything it is the modern force of brute colonisation, industry, twin forces of rationality and irrationality blurred into a violent social magma... abortion-demon countryside... mass hominid slaughterhouse, bomb-rape of civilisation.

SAGE AND REPORT. MODS ARE COMING. THEY WILL SAVE US. I know they're coming. I believe in them. They're heroes.

youtube.com/watch?v=OBwS66EBUcY

Shift everything down one and put esoteric hitlerism at the top

I seriously hope you don't consider Richard fucking Spencer the intellectual you want to hide behind

In all my years I've never seen a national socialist or any denomination thereof not look like absolute shit IRL
You can tell because your image can't even find real examples

Backed. Its crucial to keep NS and trad paganism strictly differentiated (the former loves to coopt the latter)

But what's above 150 ?
t. delusional about his IQ

>Libertarian socialists
Yeah. Them and the vegan meat eaters.

As if taking power away from democratically accountable governments and giving it to corporations in the name of freedom isn't the oxymoron.

Liberal socialists

Where do you draw the line between Egoists and neckbeard libertarians

Normies are unironically where everyone should be desu.

Principle vs practical

xD

Are both of you in high school? Libertarian was always socialist.
youtube.com/watch?v=GUs_Q_rfl9I

Holds for my general experience, though I'd probably split theists into two sections — those that read commentarries in the bible (120+) and those that don't (90-). I'd also carve out a specific section for pundits/thought leaders that falls between marxists and theists, because being able to manipulate people into believing self-defeating ideologies (liberal, conservative, stormfaggotry) takes real fucking wit.
t. 139 reactionary.

>when you realize this chart was made by a clueless 18 year old art student who dwells at starbucks all day

As the person who made the image (flattered to see it used as bait) I agree. For instance, Hitler and Hitler-followers are two absolutely different breeds of people. And, to take my image a little more seriously than I should: to be honest, I am not so sure about the relatively high position of the theists. Obviously, a straight plane of IQ makes more subtle differences in thought hard to quanitfy, but what I notice most about religious and mystic writers is their absolutely vivid insight into the human condition (see: Weil or Buber or Augustine). A man like Aquinas is a little more like a Marxist, a very impressive systematiser with a devoted attention to ethical and epistemological concerns.
Houellebecq is an artist of rich empathy and insight, but not a genius, and certainly not by frail political associations. Spengler and de Maistre are more like autistic hyperbreeds of mystic, moralist and systematiser, with something like the stubborn character of Schopenhauer in them. I think I put all those people there not to judge their intelligence but to associate a certain mindset with a certain knowing pessimism and intellectual frankness. But Evola, Spengler and de Maistre are... hm... more romantic icons than intellectual heavyweights. Vivid, forceful, encapsulating... but not rigorous ideas.
Solzhenitsyn is a man with mystic human insights, but can't readily be placed above the likes Adorno. Pope Benedict XVI (like Aquinas) is more appropriate, given his autistic German philosophical nature. Perhaps I should have used symbols and representations moreso than profiles in the right-hand side of the chart in the same way I did with the left. It embarrasses me to look at it a little. The general sentiment is something I agree with, but the specifics are all completely inaccurate. I made it for fun - obviously Stirner's picture represents a particular moral attitude and philosophical acuity rather than the real psychiatric intellect of the man himself - but these things strike deeper into our minds than we acknowledge. I do not want to perpetuate any discomfiting illusions. I do not want to embolden obstinance. I do not want to provoke unease and discomfort of the wrong kind.

>it lines up with my IQ perfectly
guys????????

>just asked my friend
>his iq is in the theist ranges
>he's literally a philosophical theist
guys??????????????????????

Where does jordan peterson fall? I am guessing near Hank Schrader

I used to be a libertarian until I realized how fucking retarded everyone is and that they need a shepherd.

im guessing youre american

Swap stormfags and liberals and yeah

im nazbol, where do i fit?

>142 IQ
>jaded reactionary
proof of principle right here :^)

Too low to be on the graph

do not reply to me ever again, liberal faggot

this post nigga hahahahaahahahahahaha

>mfw third position traditionalist larping as emmanuel macron

I like to think so but probably not
t. Realist marxistfag

>marxist
>realist

hardly

>As a Marxist

Which is probably true, since libertarianism only really works if you have people smart enough to make logical decisions.

If all people acted in their rational self interested shrinking the government to a minimum is probably very viable.

But if you have gangs of ~75 IQ people running around you better have a state to protect you.

Where Solzhenitzyn and Dostoyevsky meet

This. Fascism and especially National Socialism are merely expressions of he same modern nihilism

>>Nearly all religious people are conservative
>>Theists score near the highest, conservatives the lowests

That strikes me as pretty accurate, the smartest people "bend back" towards religion but their faith is radically different from your typical megachurch attendee. I also suspect something like this applies for conservatism, though some of it's leftists and liberals getting cocky from making redneck kids look silly in school and then floundering when they try the same approach against thoughtful conservatives and theists.

>as a marxist

...mods?
youtube.com/watch?v=ePRZC_OulYc

Intelligence is something that transcends category because sufficiently intelligent people can convince themselves of even the most ridiculous thing and make it sound convincing if they really wish to believe in it.

Rural redneck ancap fags

Yeah William Lane Craig proves that