Naturalistic fallacy

Please do, you seem to have some internal dissonance

can you come up with a two situations with all the same natural facts but with a different moral status?

I give my money to N, thinking he would help people. He kills people instead.
vs
I give my money to N, thinking he would kill people. He kills people.

why would you think he would help/kill people??

Not that user, but you are at the doorstep of a moral discussion.