Why do some people seriously believe that AI will eventually replace humans creatively...

Why do some people seriously believe that AI will eventually replace humans creatively? Has the writing scene really gone downhill to such an extent that this seems believable now, or is it just another hysterical doomsday scenario?

A kind in glass and a cousin, a spectacle and nothing strange a single hurt color and an arrangement in a system to pointing. All this and not ordinary, not unordered in not resembling. The difference is spreading.

Nickel, what is nickel, it is originally rid of a cover.

The change in that is that red weakens an hour. The change has come. There is no search. But there is, there is that hope and that interpretation and sometime, surely any is unwelcome, sometime there is breath and there will be a sinecure and charming very charming is that clean and cleansing. Certainly glittering is handsome and convincing.

There is no gratitude in mercy and in medicine. There can be breakages in Japanese. That is no programme. That is no color chosen. It was chosen yesterday, that showed spitting and perhaps washing and polishing. It certainly showed no obligation and perhaps if borrowing is not natural there is some use in giving.

Because a thorough analysis of what it is that generates creative product will one day be mined and replicated and improved upon (the goal being to elicit certain sets of responses from humans) and the competitor for human creativity will be something wholly owned by the corporations which need creative product.
There won't be a market for human creativity, only a market for that which best evokes certain sets of responses.
Which is as it has always been.

Artificial intelligence will never exist.

>Has the writing scene really gone downhill to such an extent that this seems believable now, or is it just another hysterical doomsday scenario?

Both

Depends on what definition you use

Yes ai will never exist totally correct foxtrot haha wow, sure is a funny thing to say charlie now i wonder zelta bravo navy

>There won't be a market for human creativity, only a market for that which best evokes certain sets of responses.

Its funny, this system basically already exists with those stupid procedurally generated youtube videos that are clickbait crack for kids.
I still doubt any algorithmic creator will come anywhere close to literature though, at best I can foresee it being utilized in dumb blockbusters.
There's too many variables and nuances for real storytelling. The very idea of what makes a good story nevermind literature is baffling past the most mundane observations of arc and climax

>Angry baby buried alive

Maybe not, but in terms of 'appealing creativity', yes.

The problem at the heart of creative AI is that it needs to be able to represent the abstractions within stories (genre, plot, characters, setting, etc ...) and the relationships between those things before it can actually "create" them in a way that is recognisable and relatable.

In other words, the system would need to be able to model and in some way "understand" and "read" the novel or the short story... before it can "write" something like that.

It will happen, but I think it will probably target certain commercially viable and formulaic niches before ever evolving into something general.

It will. Or something called Artificial Intelligence will.

General AI is to Applied AI as Monotheism was to Polytheism. Right now we have the applied AI, and if General AI ever arrives it will wipe out everything else completely. The real problem with it is that success and failure in creating a General AI are probably completely impossible to distinguish from a human perspective. If we created something we called "General AI" which was just some random, wild, chaotic process of errant logic and statistics which caused random bullshit and chaos... we might really have no idea.

The people who created it wouldn't care, either. Because really they have in many cases just projected religious fantasies into technology. An alternate world separate from our own... transferring your consciousness to that world and gaining immortality... the ambition to create "God" in the substrate of new technology.

I can't help but think that the companies and governments pursuing AI are deep down motivated by the same thing warring tribes were thinking back during the bronze age: "I pray my god is stronger than your god". Power, really.

Yes, yes, we know. Also, humans will never fly, we will never be able to move faster than a cheetah, we will never be able to breath underwater, etc., etc...

Retard

Humans will never have flying cars...

What do you think a plane is?

it sure as shit isn't a car

It pretty much is.

>Language-games

They seriously believe it because shit like wasn't anywhere near possible years ago either. Everytime someone says there are too many variables to account for and that there is too much nuance for a machine learning solution, they should think again. The real issue here is that our current network knowledge is stuck into the black box era and we simply can't seem to be able to do much more than writing "lul linear combinations" on peer reviewed journals.

In spite of this hurdle we are advancing more and more into the field, insofar as quality of results are concerned; perhaps in part because machine learning is one of the most privately funded fields (by Google and co. of course), not as much fundamental research is being done, which may serve to fuel the doubts anyway.

Also writing has gone nowhere to make this seem believable, it's not a function of some arbitrary value of "human complexity" or anything like that. It's all about the sheer size of available datasets and the quality of training. It's not a doomsday scenario either, I don't think we'll even care about it if it happens (not gonna magically start selling books because it was written by J.Gears-Rolling), with a big "if" too because we don't know if there will even be capital interest to develop such kind of machines.

It really isn't. Stop being a retard

The people who beleive that are faithless beings who don't grasp the purpose or nature of literature (much less art as a whole), and how it's inextricably tied to the human spirit.

>Language-games

Are you autistic? The point of a car is a universal individuated units for distances of short to medium length. A plane nowhere fits this purpose

how can it be a car if it doesn't have wheels?

but it does

those are wings, dummy

>Why do some people seriously believe that AI will eventually replace humans creatively? Has the writing scene really gone downhill to such an extent that this seems believable now, or is it just another hysterical doomsday scenario?

Look at the formulaic writing of most shows, movies, novels, etc. Do you honestly think that human writers can compete with a tireless AI that can write a thousand novels in a week? The AI revolution with super-saturate the market with literally millions of novels, tv shows, movies, songs, poems, you name it. It will, however, create a niche for humanities as opposed to whatever you call it when the humanities are automated. That being said, so many people already consume garbage by-the-numbers media. You can expect the majority of people not to make an active choice for human-produced content—not only that, but it won't cross people's minds that it's virtually free labour, but it will be priced competitively with cheap writing like those checkout romance novels. Look at mass-manufactured electronics: They're basically free to manufacture, but people still pay top dollar for plastic discs with magnets in them.

Whatever corporation or government invents AI first is going to bootyslap the entire world economy. People keep saying it's going to "change everything," but I don't think that's true. I think it's just going to create a massive surplus of whatever content follows formulae, especially music and stories. It's going to put a lot of writers out of work, and it's going to make whoever owns the AIs very rich. But that's about as far as it will go for a very long time, perhaps until an AI "escapes into the wild."

no they are wheels, for driving on a road

if it's a car how come I've never seen one in a car park?

Which is why so many people spend their time watching anime and reading manga, which are not at all derivative and constantly strive to explore the rich spectrum of the human experience, pushing the boundaries of the medium itself, thrilling the audience with both novelty and subtlety.

Nobody said plebians didnt exist. And there's nothing really wrong with anime/manga in concept either, many quality works exist in those mediums.

plebeians don't exit

Don't exit what, the system?

they don't go

t. third worlder

>Look at the formulaic writing of most shows, movies, novels, etc. Do you honestly think that human writers can compete with a tireless AI that can write a thousand novels in a week?
Only mediocre trash is formulaic. If all AI will be able to take over is the Lifetime channel, who cares?