Ockham’s razor

>ockham’s razor

>rowling's dildo

>that argument is a fallacy!

>Hume's guillotine

If they don't call it the principle of parsimony, it's difficult to treat them as a serious intellectual.

The simplest explanation for your post is that you're a brainlet.

>argumentum ad fallacyum fallacy

>dante's inferno

> shrodinger’s cat

>Schrödinger's Rapist

Keke'd

>Being so contrarian that you reject the literal rules of logical thought for the sake of feeling vaguely superior in your own mind

Your virginity is permanent

Fallacies are a meme.

sophism is what's up

Naming fallacies is just shitty debating.

Let me guess. You're going to reference r/Atheism and tell me that the fundamentals of logical error that every intellectual has accepted for thousands of years are for soyboys.

Grow up you psued

>Marki's plier

>rules of logical thought

>I don't care about coherence

>claims to defend Logic™
>thinks a razor is a hard-and-fast rule

>Non-aggression principle

>implying I ever said anything like that

I'd say non sequitur but I'm sure you'll get upset.

coherence is artificial
so you shouldn't

Are you trying to argue that there's no such thing aa truth? Is this what the peterson fags have done?

It's not mocking the thing itself but how people use it. Whenever an argument gets too complicated, you use the ockham's razor card and disregard what is being said as useless theory to stick with your limited worldview.

Go on, I want to see what bullshit you pull to defend the idea that your mention of "the literal rules of logical thought" somehow had nothing to do with any of the posts before yours.

...

Eh, no, actually quite the opposite. Appealing to fallacies is a /pol/ thing.

Yes

Rules aren't laws, bucko.

You're the psued here buddy

Epic retort bruh