Very Short Introductions

Which of these are worth reading and which should be avoided?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ceM8GITkKxg
collabedit.com/cy2qg
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Good;
Aristotle
Art Theory
Barthes
Classics
Complexity
Egyptian Myth
Empire
German Philosophy
Literary Theory
Poststructualism


Bad
Hegel
Marx

Seriously, both of the two above were written by Peter Singer. Multiple Hegel scholars has remarked that they believe that Singer wrote them out of spite because he hates Hegel and Marx and he wanted to poison the well on their scholarship but writing intentionally wrong and shitty introductions.

Not that user but I would add the Hume one to the bad list. It was not actually an introduction but more of a repacked essay by an academic that quarrels over a particularly narrow part of his philosophy.

It would be cool to make a img where they are listed as good or bad and why.

Can someone explain to me what I would benefit from reading Very Short Introductions?
Is it supposed to be something I read to see if I enjoy it? Or to understand the basis of what it is?

They purport to provide a 100 page summary of a field of study and a bibliography of important works in that field. How you benefit from that is up to you. My hope is that I can use them to expand my breadth of knowledge without committing to full-length textbooks or masses of primary sources.

Thanks anons. More suggestions/warnings welcome.

This would be cool. A flowchart would be interesting as well. I'll probably make one for the books I read, but there's so many of them.

>over 500 titles in the series

better get started lol

Good:
>Aristotle
>author is a Professor of Ancient Philosophy, edited a complete collection of Aristotle's works

>Classics
>edited by two respected experienced classics scholars, one of which described as "Britain's best-known classicist"

>German Philosophy
>author respected by other German philosophers like Frank and Habermas and also is a translator of Schelling and Schleiermacher

Bad:
>Hegel and Mark
>author's only significant work on animal rights

This may be cherry picking but I think there's an easy way to know if the book you're reading will be shit or not.

I got the Spanish civil war one and its just too fucking short.