INTELLECTUAL HAPPENING ALERT!

About time Zizek responds to Peterson's meteoric rise, he's had a lot of time to witness it so I expect this to be good

BASED Zizek

I am of the left, so can someone explain why my supposedly left leaning socialist academic liberal moral subjectivity loving SJW friends hate him?

the amount of ideolojee that is about to go down

He had enough time to write something good but this article is literally nothinh

As reward for cleaning their room

Who will build the ritualistic church?

I love Zizek and find Peterson ridiculous but he was right, this article was a piece of shit and totally phoned in.

His article is good. He's subtly saying that both the American left and the American right are mentally deranged, which is true.

DEBATE IMMINENT

>it took Europe thousands of years to win a novel prize in literature
>America won after only 154 years of existence

lmao stay mad gyro poors we’ll handle culture from here

JORDAN B PETERSON ABSOLUTELY DESTROYS POSTMODERNISM CLICK HERE TO WATCH NOW!!!

the article is not even primarily about peterson, it is about the reasons zizek believes he is popular.

I D E O L O G I E

I was about to go back to actually read but I guess I will have to meme for another hour or so

Can't wait till they start analyzing movies together.

How so?

IT'S HAPPENING

Oh for fuck's sake, of all the people who could have debated memerson it had to be fucking Zizek?

After that shit show of an article, I have to chose my man Peterson for winner of the debate.

How relevant is Zizek anymore? What's he done in the last few years? Are there any really good new lectures on YouTube?

Zizek is jealous because he isn't the go-to pseudo-intellectual for normies anymore. The article was garbage and the fact that he resorted to the same arguments of the mainstream liberal media is honestly sad.

I honestly think most posters on this board could write a better article criticizing Peterson.

>implying an article was needed to see that
Zizek is senile

HOLY FUCK
NOOSE, YOU'LL HAVE TO WAIT

Being a brainlet I do not understand
snif sniff
Please violently elaborate

Zizeks leaving something out which seems pretty important. Why is it that the rights misrepresentations are accepts whilsts the lefts are rejected?

"Name one time I said that!" is not a worthy argument

Most of the article was a copy and paste job talking about refugees despite Peterson for making sweeping claims about the ideological motivations of others without scientific justification despite the fact that's what he does all the fucking time

He wrote his best book like 1 of 2 years ago
Agree

Will it be Hitchens Vs Galloway tier?
Or Yinappolous vs Shapiro tier?
Or a bum fighting a tramp?

>implying an article was needed to see that
Normally I would agree, but judging by the sheer amount of retards ITT who completely missed the point of the article I'd say yes, it was needed.

>Why is it that the rights misrepresentations are accepts whilsts the lefts are rejected?

What the fuck are you on about. The fact trannies are being taken seriously in the first place is proof this isn't the case

It will be a more like a gentleman fighting a bear.

Plato vs Aristotle tier

when has Zizek ever debated anyone? Even in formal debates he just uses it as an excuse to monologue and tell jokes

>yfw you'll live to witness the greatest intellectual meme-off of history

my god i have to clap handshh *sniff* at thishh revolutionary potentshhial, it's shhenshhual,erotic like a lap dancshh, in a Freudian kind of way.

Chomsky vs Foucault tier

just something he says in a very peculiar way.

Nobel prizes didn't exist for thousands of years you fucking idiot and you only started being relevant after Europeans immigrated to the US, before that you won fuck all

he had that one lecture where he debates with that shrill nyu jewess Nietzsche scholar which was bretty entertaining, he goes off about why Trump won etc
youtube.com/watch?v=7lrU_ZX15C8

user, I...

youtube.com/watch?v=gP92j-uEnps

Zizek said once that "philosophers don't debate" and he sticks by that. As a Hegelian he believes every person is on the path towards discovering the truth that he grasps more fully so all he has to do is Socratically discuss with his interlockular until they eventually find out they already agree with him

>copy and paste
Did he plagiarize something?

un-ironically this. I'm actually excited, just gonna have to tune out both fanbases

i never witnessed this; please help sauce?

Yeah, himself, he does this all the time for his newspaper pieces

it will be like peterson & harris where they don't say a single thing for 2 hours

this but ironically

But that's the best part (since they are both essentially memes)

Who will be the host? Rogan or h3h3?

POSTMODERNIST ISIS TERRORISTS CROSSING THE MEXICO BORDER THANKS TO A FRANKFURT SCHOOL CULTURAL MARXIST SLAVOJ ZIZEK!!! CLICK THIS VIDEO SEE HOW TO GET BITCOIN FOR FREE!!!

dave rubin

Just youtube search it retard, fuck me

True tbqhwyf

Peterson and Harris was simply intellectual mutual masturbation

*sniff* *sniff*
And so on, and so on.
*sniff* *sniff*
And that is how ideology functions today.

reviewbrah

God vs Himself
Reality will, quite literally, shatter.
The ride's just begun

>Why is it that the rights misrepresentations are accepts whilsts the lefts are rejected?
Isn't it the other way around? Just to give an example, any time Peterson says something that Nietzsche wouldn't have agreed with he's mocked for misinterpreting him, but Zizek is free to reinterpret Lacan as much as he pleases.

That's such bullshit, fuck that. I KNOW THE "TRUTH" BUT I WONT DEBATE IT OR TELL YOU CLEARLY

Cliff Sergent

Europeans lmao

the boys on TDS

I will search.
And no, I won't fuck you; I'll make love to you instead

did you read the article? He's talking about the mainsteam

What the fuck has Zizek have to do with the american left and what the fuck does Peterson have to do with European anti-refugees? Did you even read the article?

In fairness, Lacan is pretty fucking open to interpretation. Nietzsche is tricky but quite clear in comparison

...

Sadler would demolish them both... in a cage match.

But Zizek is a DANGEROUS POSTMODERNIST and has the freedom to freestyle.

No, I obviously didn't. I'm not some fag who goes around reading shit. I'm here to see anons fight.

Please, god
You've given me nothing and spat when I thanked
I only beg you to give me this

>but quite clear
I've yet to see a single thinker who understands his work

Pre or post knee injury?

>Nietzsche
>Not open to interpretation
really hardens my carapace

Angie Does Books

It should be hosted by Joe Rogan and be in one of those e-sports arenas and they both have to wear racing suits covered in sponsors and whenever they make a point they have to stand up and point like in phoenix wright and there will be reverb on their mics

IN COMPARISON

Really though, Zizek phoned that article in, not even a fan of Peterson but Zizek sounded like any other normie liberal

TED talk

...

that silver-haired dude from CNN will host
Sam Hyde and Jerry Seinfeld will each do a stand-up routine during intermissions

He isn't talking about Peterson, you fucking imbecile. The article is about why Peterson has become so popular. It's more like some people like nazis. Nazis are bad. The same people like Peterson therefore Peterson must be bad too.

#
>Peterson is bad
>Nazis were bad
>Peterson is like the Nazis

Absolute state of Zizek

The absolute state of Žižek's life, imagine being 68 years old and having to write shit like this, having to write an "impassioned" polemic of some middle-brow status quo non-entity when all you want to do is fuck your hot teen wife and snort cocaine

WHEN WILL ZIZEK RESPOND

I honestly don't think there's much to debate. They would both masturbate to their own ideas and it would yield no resolution of any kind. I personally think that it should be a wrestling match and not a debate.

>he isn't talking about Peterson he's talking about Peterson

Take a breather user

he even admits during his talks he constantly plagiarizes himself for his articles and books and talks

Žižek is U/ACC at this point, I'm pretty sure he literally does not care and is only trying to earn a paycheck, or maybe someone at the independent has a good cocaine hook up, I don't know.