What are the best books on geopolitics?

What are the best books on geopolitics?

Other urls found in this thread:

ivle.nus.edu.sg/Lms/public/view_moduleoutline.aspx?CourseID={5806ed63-eced-4fe5-9a2c-144ccb05ebb6}
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Kissinger
Samuel P. Huntington
>The World of Yesterday
>The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu
>War and the Law of Nations: A General History
>Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace
>The Judgment of the Nations
>The Long Shadow: The Legacies of the Great War in the Twentieth Century
>After Tamerlane: The Global History of Empire Since 1405
>Rites of Peace: The Fall of Napoleon and the Congress of Vienna (extremely dense)

Nomos of the Earth

Rather than looking at Veeky Forums for recommendations, just search up a syllabus on Google and read the readings there, then go through the bibliographies in those books and find your own.

Here's one from the University of Singapore (top in Asia): ivle.nus.edu.sg/Lms/public/view_moduleoutline.aspx?CourseID={5806ed63-eced-4fe5-9a2c-144ccb05ebb6}

Saul Cohen, Brzezinski, Raoul Castex, Mahan, Haushofer, Spykman, Mackinder, Ratzel, Kjellen are some of the big names

wait, switch Judgments of the Nations with "Dynamics of World History", or read both, it would be superfluous.

>by australian who hates obama for his cowardice and bush for his awful strategic choices
>covers the expansion of islamic salafist terrorism by theory
>Petraeus' chief of staff on counter terrorism strat

...

...

How do you find these?

>muh Hegel
I read his End of History essay and found it enough

Simple google

Just by googling Subject + syllabus?

Yep

Not him, but I look at college syllabus pdfs posted online. google for inurl:syllabus inurl:edu and then what you want

This is literally a mea culpa, dont be willfully ignorant to posture in front of your shitty malaysian sodomy imageboard peers.

>inurl:syllabus inurl:edu

Damn, that's useful. Never thought of that.

intitle and "author" are good too.

You can also use inurl:xls or csv in order to get lists of conference attendees

mental maps series
each essay is sort of emulating perspective of each "player"

If you can find the big us schools of [subject] you can really zoom in

It isn't because he just wrote shit about liberal '''democracies''' and then used an appeal to authority to justify his shit (appeal that had nothing to do with said liberal democracies). There are plenty of competitors to liberal democracy. He could've wrote that book at any point in time and it wouldn't be weaker than it is. The sheer fact that liberal democracies aren't democracies nor will naturally lead to democracies is enough to prove down his point

You are trying to disprove a 30ish year old paper which was misunderstood in the first place AND wrong who's author was a neo-liberal justifying neo-con worldviews who has recanted and moved towards an institution based analysis of growth and decay. No one is disagreeing with you.